Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Sunday, November 30, 2008

Exegesis...Eisegesis...Whatever! I Just Need Jesus!

Ever heard such a statement? I am an ex- Independent Fundamental Baptist (IFB), now reformed Baptist, and I've heard such statements before. For example, it's very common to hear a statement such as, "Theology is for theologians, I just preach the Word!"...or "My people don't need long, intellectual speeches on justification, imputation...just give them Jesus!" One time I was preaching a verse-by-verse study on the book of II Peter. The pastor hinted that I was taking too long...I'd only taken 6 messages to get through one and 1/2 chapters...apparantly that's too much time on God's precious Word!

There is an element of willing stupidity in today's "church" where people seem to shun doctrine and context. As long as people are entertained and the message sounds right they just accept it as "good preachin' brother!"

What makes for good preaching anyway? Let me share a thought from Dr James White's book, "Scripture Along" that you can find on his ministry's website, http://www.aomin.org/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=60_62&products_id=53



For those who hate to study and don't think big "theological" words are spiritual...sorry! What's the difference between "exegesis" and "eisegesis"? Knowing the difference between the two words makes all the difference in the world on whether you are preaching a true message from the Lord or not.

The following quote is found on pages 80-81 of his book: "In vitally important ways it is a science, requiring of its regular and careful practitioner painstaking attention to detail and the utilization of the tools of his trade. In other ways it is an art, something which one becomes ever more skilled with practice and the passage of time. In other aspects it is an act of worship, requiring spiritual preparation and a willing heart marked by obedience." (p. 80)

A thought...do you prepare your sermons/lessons as an act of worship? Do you joy in the painstaking and diligent study...hard study...of God's Word? Or is it a burden? Listen again...

"For some it is a nuisance, something only "elitests" do to prove their theologies. And then there are those who find it nothing more than a chore, something to be done because it needs to be done, though it fires no passions and doesn't engage the heart of mind" (p. 80)

I'll be blunt...if this second description is you, please do yourself, and all of us, a favor...get out of the ministry! If you don't want to spend the time (12-15 hours per sermon as a suggestion) to truly prepare to preach then you don't belong in the pulpit...how could you be called to preach. Preaching is not "getting up a message"...it's careful exegesis of the Word of God.

What is exegesis? I fully agree with Dr White's definition where he says that exegesis is "the process of seeking to understand the written text of Scripture in its own context."

Why don't many people do this? Because it takes work...work that most modern preachers have no time for amidst many other more pressing tasks such as carnival planning, scheduling the next planned evangelistic scheme, setting up stageshows and lighting/sound boards, etc, etc.

Here's a thought...study the Word of God and let it speak for itself...you'd be surprised what happens.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Jim Leavenworth at 2 Comments Links to this post

Friday, November 28, 2008

DEATH AT WAL-MART AFTER STAMPEDE

Christmas in America!







Worker dies at Long Island Wal-Mart after being trampled in Black Friday stampede



A Wal-Mart worker died after being trampled when hundreds of shoppers smashed through the doors of a Long Island store Friday morning, police and witnesses said.

The 34-year-old worker, employed as an overnight stock clerk, tried to hold back the unruly crowds just after the Valley Stream store opened at 5 a.m.

Witnesses said the surging throngs of shoppers knocked the man down. He fell and was stepped on. As he gasped for air, shoppers ran over and around him.

"He was bum-rushed by 200 people," said Jimmy Overby, 43, a co-worker. "They took the doors off the hinges. He was trampled and killed in front of me. They took me down too...I literally had to fight people off my back."

The unidentified victim was rushed to an area hospital, where he was pronounced dead at 6:03 a.m., police said.

The cause of death was pending.

A 28-year-old pregnant woman was knocked to the floor during the mad rush. She was hospitalized for observation, police said.

Three other shoppers suffered minor injuries, cops said.

Before police shut down the store, eager shoppers streamed past emergency crews as they worked furiously to save the store clerk's life.

"They were working on him, but you could see he was dead, said Halcyon Alexander, 29. "People were still coming through."

Only a few stopped.

"They're savages," said shopper Kimberly Cribbs, 27. "It's sad. It's terrible


Here is the link to the original story:
Christmas
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 1 Comments Links to this post

Directives for avoiding dissension in the home


by Richard Baxter (1615-1691)


It is a great duty of husbands and wives to live in quietness and peace, and avoid all occasions of wrath and discord. Because this is a duty of so great importance, I shall first open to you the great NECESSITY of it, and then give you more particular directions to perform it.

(1) Your discord will be your pain, and the vexation of our lives. Like a disease, or wound, or fracture in your own bodies, which will pain you until it is cured; you will hardly keep peace in your minds, when peace is broken so near you in your family. As you would take heed of hurting yourselves, and as you would hasten the cure when you are hurt; so should you take heed of any breach of peace, and quickly seek to heal it when it is broken.

(2) Dissension tends to cool your love; frequent dissension tends to leave a habit of distaste and averseness on the mind. Wounding is separating; and to be tied together by any outward bonds, when your hearts are separated, is but to be tormented; and to have the insides of adversaries, while you have marital outsides. As the difference between my 'home' and my 'prison' is that I willingly and with delight dwell in the one, but am unwillingly confined to the other; such will be the difference between a quiet and an unquiet life, in your married state; it turns your dwelling and delight into a prison, where you are chained to those calamities, which in a free condition you might flee.

(3) Dissension between the husband and the wife, disorders all other family affairs. They are like oxen unequally yoked--which can perform no work, because they are always striving with one another.

(4) It exceedingly unfits you for the worship of God; you are not fit to pray together, nor to confer together of heavenly things, nor to be helpers to each other's souls. I need not tell you this, you feel it by experience. Wrath and bitterness will not allow you so much exercise of love and holy composedness of mind, as every one of those duties requires.

(5) Dissension disables you to govern your families aright. Your children will take example by you; or think they are at liberty to do what they desire, when they find you taken up with such animosity between yourselves. They will think you unfit to reprove them for their faults--when they see you guilty of such faults and folly of your own. Nay, you will become the shame and secret derision of your children, and bring yourselves into contempt.

(6) Your dissensions will expose you to the malice of Satan, and give him advantage for manifold temptations. A house divided cannot stand; an army divided is easily conquered, and made a prey to the enemy. You cannot foresee what abundance of sin you put yourselves in danger of.

By all these reasons, you may see what dissensions between husband and wife do tend to.

DIRECTIVES for avoiding dissension in the home

(1) Keep up your marital love in a constant heat and vigor. Love will suppress wrath. You cannot become bitter upon small provocations, against those whom you dearly love; much less can you proceed to reviling words, or to averseness and estrangedness, or any abuse of one another. Or if a breach and wound be unhappily made, the balsamic quality of love will heal it. But when love once cools, small matters exasperate and breed antipathy.

(2) Both husband and wife must mortify their pride and passion, which are the causes of impatience; and must pray and labor for a humble, meek, and quiet spirit. A proud heart is troubled and provoked by every word or action that seems to tend to their undervaluing. A peevish, proud mind is like a sore and ulcerated member--which will be pained if it be touched. He that must live near such a sore, diseased, impatient, proud mind--must live even as the nurse does with the child, that makes it her business to rock it, and lull, and sing it quiet when it cries; for to be angry with it, will do no good. And if you have married one of such a sick or childish temper, you must resolve to bear and use them accordingly. But no Christian should bear with such a malady in themselves; nor be patient with such impatience, pride and haughtiness in themselves. Once get the victory over yourselves, and the cure of your own impatience, and you will easily keep peace with one another.

(3) Agree together beforehand, that when one is in a tempestuous, angry fit, the other shall silently and gently bear it--until it be past and you have come to your senses again. Do not both be angry at the same time. When the fire is kindled, quench it with gentle words and demeanor, and do not cast on more fuel, by answering provokingly and sharply, or by multiplying words, and by answering wrath with wrath.

(4) If you cannot quickly quench the anger in your heart--yet at least refrain your tongues! Speak no reproachful or provoking words. Talking hotly and angrily does blow the fire, and increase the flame. Be but silent, and you will the sooner return to your serenity and peace. Foul words tend to more displeasure. As Socrates said when his wife first railed at him, and next threw a vessel of foul water upon him, "I thought when I heard the thunder, there would come rain"; so you may foretell worse following, when foul, unfitting words begin. If you cannot easily allay your wrath, you may hold your tongues, if you are truly willing.

(5) Let the sober party condescend to speak gently and to entreat the other. Say to your angry wife or husband, 'You know this should not be between us; love must allay it, and it must be repented of. God does not approve it, and we shall not approve it when this heated argument is over. This frame of mind is contrary to a praying frame, and this language contrary to a praying language; we must pray together soon; let us do nothing contrary to prayer now. Sweet water and bitter come not from one spring,' etc. Some calm and humble words of reason, may stop the torrent, and revive the reason which passion had overcome.

(6) Confess your fault to one another, when angry passion has prevailed against you; and ask forgiveness of each other, and join in prayer to God for pardon. This will lay a greater engagement on you the next time, to refrain from argument. You will surely be ashamed to do that which you have so confessed and asked forgiveness for--of God and each other.

If you will but practice these directives, your family peace may be preserved.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Charles Fry at 0 Comments Links to this post

For whom did Christ die?

The following is from Spurgeon’s sermon,
"LAUS DEO" (No. 572, Romans 11:36)

We hold that Christ did not redeem every
man, but only redeemed those men who will
ultimately attain unto eternal life.

We do not believe that he redeemed the damned.

We do not believe that he poured out
his life blood for souls already in hell.

We never can imagine that Christ suffered
in the room and stead of all men, and that
then afterwards these same men have to
suffer for themselves.

We do not believe that Christ pays their
debts, and then God makes them pay their
debts again a second time.

We hold to this- that Christ laid down his
life for his sheep, and that his laying down
his life for the sheep involved and secured
the salvation of every one of them.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Charles Fry at 0 Comments Links to this post

Thursday, November 27, 2008

Behar on Homeschooling

Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

The Porpoise Driven Life

A little humor for today!


Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 2 Comments Links to this post

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

True Repentance

From Spurgeon's sermon, "APART"

True repentance is always accompanied by sorrow.

Repentance is a deep, radical, fundamental, lasting change;
and you will find that, whenever you meet with it in Scripture,
it is always accompanied with sorrow for past sin.

And rest assured of this fact-- that the repentance which has
no tear in its eye, and no mourning for sin in its heart,
is a repentance which needs to be repented of.

In such false repentance, there is no evidence of conversion,
and no sign of the existence of the grace of God.

The man who knows that his sin is forgiven,
does not cease to mourn for it.
No, brethren, his mourning becomes deeper as
his knowledge of his guilt becomes greater.
His hatred of sin grows in proportion as he understands
that love of Christ by which his sin is put away.

In true believers, mourning for sin is chastened and sweetened,
and, in one sense, the fang of bitterness is taken out.

But, in another sense, the more we realize
our indebtedness to God's grace, and the more we see of
the sufferings of Christ in order to effect our redemption,
the more do we hate sin, and the more do we lament
that we ever fell into it.

The man who has led the purest life, when he is brought
before God by the humbling influence of the Holy Spirit,
is the man who almost invariably considers himself
to have been viler than anybody else.

"Repentance is to leave
The sin we loved before,
And show that we in earnest grieve
By doing so no more."
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Charles Fry at 1 Comments Links to this post

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Web Site Makes Millions by Connecting Cheaters

From NPR. org

There are hundreds of Internet dating sites catering to just about every kind of person looking for love — sites for single parents, sites for Jewish people and sites for members of the military.

Now, there are also dating services to help you find that special someone, even when you already have someone special.

AshleyMadison.com, which caters to men and women who are already in relationships and are looking for something more, is the largest dating service of its kind. The Toronto-based company has made millions of dollars by helping people cheat on their spouses. Their tag line gets right to the point: "Life is short, have an affair."

Their radio ads even recommend cheating on the company dime.

"When you have a private moment at work today, visit AshleyMadison.com. You'll be happy you came," the ads say.

Don, a 52-year-old IT specialist living in Southern California who, not surprisingly, preferred not to give his real last name, is one of the site's hundreds of users.

"The ad sounded pretty interesting, so I thought I'd give it a shot and see if I got any action," he says.

Don, or "Don Deshizzle" as he is known online, says he is looking for an "NSA" — no strings attached — relationship. So far, he says, he has paid about $100 to e-mail and instant message with other Ashley Madison members.

"What you do is you buy credits — I think 100 credits at a time for $55 — and then each e-mail you initiate costs five credits. You burn through them pretty quickly," he says.

Don says he likes the site because it gives him the opportunity to be upfront about his marital status.

"Because, I guess, all the cards are on the table. It's not like if you go to a singles or a standard site, then you kind of have the stigma of being a cheater and that doesn't seem right," he says.

He doesn't feel too ethically troubled by what he's doing, he says, though he hasn't met anyone in person yet.

As for the people profiting from the Ashley Madison Web site, they say they have no moral qualms.

"This is just a business to me. This is a market need, just like any other business that's successful. There's huge demand for it," says Chief Operating Officer Noel Biderman, who is married with children. Biderman says he is faithful to his wife, but he doesn't object to the fact that cheaters have helped his online business make more than $20 million since it started in 2002.

"This is just a fact of life. Monogamy is not in our DNA," he says.

In fact, Biderman goes so far as to claim that a little infidelity may do a person good — helping an insecure man or woman reclaim a sense of self-worth.

"Women come to a service like Ashley Madison because they haven't been sent roses or flowers in God knows how long. Valentine's Day gets forgotten. That re-validation comes in a female user in our site within 30 or 40 minutes — as a number of guys are knocking at her door and professing their desire to be with her," he says.

Framingham State College sociology professor Virginia Rutter, who specializes in marital relations and sexuality, says there is nothing wrong with having a vivid sexual imagination.

"It's great to have a relationship that can tolerate and actually support and enjoy the fact that partners will flirt, will be interested in other people," she says.

What is not great, Rutter says, is lying to your partner or spouse and secretly conducting outside relationships.

"That kind of injury, that kind of loss of trust is going to make ... your relationship a lot harder to conduct," she says.

She urges people to take the time and energy that it takes to troll a cheating Web site, and re-invest it in their existing relationships.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Bible Reading

by Thomas Brooks--

"Remember that it is not hasty reading,
but serious meditation on holy and heavenly truths,
that makes them prove sweet and profitable to the soul.

It is not the mere touching of the flower by the bee that gathers
honey, but her abiding for a time on the flower that draws out the
sweet.

It is not he that reads most, but he that meditates most, that will
prove to be the choicest, sweetest, wisest, and strongest Christian."
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Charles Fry at 0 Comments Links to this post

'Life is Short, Have an Affair'

As Christians we know that we love in a fallen world however, there are times that we are still shocked by what we see and hear. Today there has been a lot of discussion on the news about a commercial. The ad was created by Ashley Madison.com

Let me give some background and information about the company.


Ashley Madison Agency Says Life Is Short, Have an Affair


Pimps are not what they used to be. In the past, they were the slimy guys in the alley who would seek to procure paying customers for the bodies of the women they victimized. Nowadays they are online services advocating secondary and even tertiary relationships, swinging, and affair guarantees - for a price.

The Ashley Madison agency pimps married folks looking for a quick romp in the hay. Hailing itself the "world's #1 married dating service specifically for attached men and women who are looking to have an extra-marital affair," the service makes no bones about its mission.

Life Is Too Short, Have an Affair with the Affair Guarantee Program for $249

Payment of $249 entitles the customer to participation in the "affair guarantee program," which pledges you to find "someone" within three months or your money back. To ensure that you keep up your end of the bargain, you must set up an attractive profile with photo, send at the very least 60 priority mail messages to different members, send five Ashley gifts, and engage in at least 180 minutes of instant messaging during that timeframe.

If after 90 days and 60 sex laced messages, five gifts and three hours of begging for attention and sexual favors there is still nobody to be found who willingly does (part of this sentence has been removed due to the fact it could offend some preaching today readers ), Ashley Madison, too, will throw in the towel, refund your money, and allow you and your battered ego to slink off.

If one may believe Noel Biderman, president of Ashley Madison, the Canadian agency has been in business for seven years and counts 2.5 million members. Your odds of finding a home wrecker for your purposes are better than average


What Do The Numbers Say?

According to the statistics quoted by the Truth about Deception website, 30-60% of American married folks do buy into the idea that life is too short, and have an affair. Of those who do have extramarital sex, 2-3% will welcome a child into their lives that is the issue of the extramarital affair. Most women will not reveal their misstep to their husbands and thus the number of men unknowingly raising someone else's child is hard to guess.


It is easy to take the high road and look down your nose at the home wreckers, but consider that monogamy, once again according to the numbers, is an extraordinarily tough road to travel, and divorce statistics show that while rutting like bunnies is easy, maintaining a monogamous relationship with one partner till "death do you part" is a challenge to which the majority of marital partners cannot or will not rise.


You can read the original article at this link:
affair



Here is the commercial that is getting talked about today:




AshleyMadison.com Commercial - Watch more Free Videos



NPR did a story about Ashley Madison. You can listen to their report here:


Web Site Makes Millions by Connecting Cheaters



Husbands and wives need to understand this kind of web-site is out there! They need to have open and frank discussions about temptation and struggle. They need to spend some time together in a serious study of 1 Corinthians 7.

I would think this post should generate some very interesting discussions.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Monday, November 24, 2008

Thoughts From the Institutes

I was reading Calvin's Institutes again and wanted to pass on a thought that I felt was very relevant to us today. As a believer, what do you desire? What do you hunger for? If you're Baptist like me you often think of food (he he!). Would any of us think seriously about skipping food for a week? Not a chance! Now...for a sobering thought...what about feasting on the Word of God...could you go that long without coming to the table and feasting on spiritual food?


Here is what Calvin said (Institutes, Vol 1, p. 83 of McNeill translation): "As far as Sacred Scripture is concerned, however much froward men try to gnaw at it, nevertheless it clearly is crammed with thoughts that could not be humanly conceived. Let each of the prophets be looked into: none will be found who does not far exceed human measure. Consequently, those for whom prophetic doctrine is tasteless ought to be thought of as lacking in taste buds."

So here's my question/exhortation...are you proving that you are "lacking in taste buds" for the Word of God? How often do you put food in your mouth...how often do you put the Word of God into you heart? If you have no appetite for spiritual food you might have a big problem...ever see a dead man eat a Big Mac? Does he desire one? No...because he's dead. Spiritually dead people don't desire and crave the Word either!
1 Peter 2:2-3- "As newborn babes, desire the sincere milk of the word, that ye may grow thereby: 3 If so be ye have tasted that the Lord is gracious."

Food for thought...
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Jim Leavenworth at 0 Comments Links to this post

The Devil's Mission of Amusement

I know this is a lengthy post but it is well worth your time to read.
The Church today is always trying to be relevant, well here is a post that is relevant to the Church.


The Church's Task—Entertainment or Evangelization?

By Archibald Brown

(Archibald Brown was a student of Charles Spurgeon. Under Brown's ministry, scores were saved and instructed.)


Different days demand their own special testimony. The watchman who would be faithful to his Lord and the city of his God, has need to carefully note the signs of the times and emphasize his witness accordingly. Concerning the testimony needed now, there can be little, if any, doubt. An evil is in the professed camp of the Lord, so gross, so brazen in its impudence, that the most shortsighted of spiritual men can hardly fail to notice it. During the past few years it has developed at an abnormal rate, ever for evil. It has worked like leaven until now the whole lump ferments. Look which way you may, its presence makes itself manifest. There is little if anything to choose between Church, Chapel, or Mission Hall. However they may differ in some respects, they bear a striking likeness in the posters which disfigure their notice boards. Amusement for the people is the leading article advertised by each. If any of my readers doubt my statement, or think my utterance too sweeping, let them take a tour of inspection and study "the announcements for the week" at the doors of the sanctuaries of the neighborhood; or let them read the religious advertisements in their local papers. I have done this again and again, until the hideous fact has been proved up to the hilt, that "amusement" is ousting "the preaching of the Gospel" as the great attraction. "Concerts," "Entertainments," "Dramatic Performances," are the words honoured with biggest type and most startling colors. The Concert is fast becoming as much a recognized part of church life as the Prayer Meeting, and is already, in most places, far better attended.

"Providing recreation for the people" will soon be looked upon as a necessary part of Christian work, and as binding upon the Church of God, as though it were a Divine command, unless some strong voice be raised which will make themselves heard. I do not presume to possess such a voice, but I do entertain the hope that I may awaken some louder echoes. Anyway, the burden of the Lord is upon me in this matter, and I leave it with Him to give my testimony ringing tone, or to let it die away in silence. I shall have delivered my soul in either case. Yet the conviction fills my mind that in all parts of the country there are faithful men and women who see the danger and deplore it and will endorse my witness and my warning.

It is only during the past few years that "amusement" has become a recognized weapon of our warfare, and developed into a mission. There has been a steady "down grade" in this respect. From "speaking out," as the Puritans did, the Church has gradually toned down her testimony; then winked at and excused the frivolities of the day. Then she has tolerated them in her borders, and now she has adopted them and provided a home for them—under the plea of "reaching the masses and getting the ear of the people." The devil has seldom done a cleverer thing—than hinting to the Church that part of her mission is to provide entertainment for the people with a view to winning them into her ranks. The evil nature which lies in every heart, has risen to catch the bait. Here, now, is an opportunity of gratifying the flesh—and yet retaining a comfortable conscience. We can now please ourselves, in order to do good to others. The rough old cross can be exchanged for a "costume," and the exchange can be made with the benevolent purpose of elevating the people.

All this is terribly sad, and the more so because truly gracious souls are being led away by the specious pretext, that amusements are a form of Christian work. They forget that a seemingly beautiful angel—may be the devil himself, "for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light" (2 Cor. 11:14).


Church amusements are not supported by Scripture

My first contention is—that providing amusement for the people is nowhere spoken of in Holy Scripture as one of the functions of the church. What her duties are, will come under our notice later on. At present it is the negative side of the question that we are dealing with. Now, surely, it our Lord had intended His church to be the caterer of entertainment, and so counteract the god of this world—He would hardly have left so important a branch of service unmentioned. If it is Christian work, why did not Christ at least hint it? "Go into all the world, and preach the Gospel to every creature," is clear enough. So would it have been, if He had added, "and provide amusement for those who do not relish the Gospel." No such addendum, however, is to be found, nor even an equivalent for such, in any one of our Lords utterances. This style of work did not seem to occur to His mind. Then again, Christ, as an ascended Lord, gives to His Church specially qualified men for the carrying on of His work, but no mention of any gift for this branch of service occurs in the list. "He gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers—for the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ," Where do the "public entertainers" come in? The Holy Spirit is silent concerning them, and his silence is eloquence.

If "providing recreation" be a part of the Church's work, surely we may look for some promise to encourage her in the toilsome task. Where is it? There is a promise that, "My Word shall not return unto Me void." There is the heart-rejoicing declaration concerning the Gospel, "it is the power of God unto salvation." There is the sweet assurance for the preacher of Christ that, whether he is successful or not as the world judges success—that he is "sweet savor unto God." There is the glorious benediction for those whose testimony, so far from amusing the world, rouses its wrath: "Blessed are you when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for My sake. Rejoice, and be exceedingly glad—for great is your reward in heaven! For so persecuted they the prophets who were before you." Were the prophets persecuted because they amused the people—or because they refused to? The Gospel of amusement has no martyr roll. In vain does one look for a promise from God—for providing recreation for a godless world. That which has no authority from Christ, no provision made for it by the Spirit, no promise attached to it by God—can only be a lying deceit, when it lays claim to be "a branch of the work of the Lord".


Church amusements are not taught by the Savior

But again, providing amusement for the people—is in direct antagonism to the teaching and life of Christ and all his apostles. What is to be the attitude of the Church towards the world according to our Lord's teaching? Strict separation and uncompromising hostility. While no hint ever passed His lips of winning the world by pleasing it, or accommodating methods to its taste—His demand for unworldliness was constant and emphatic. He sets forth in one short sentence, what He would have His disciples to be: "You are the salt of the earth." Yes, the salt—not the sugar-candy! Something the world will be more inclined to spit out—than swallow with a smile. Something more calculated to bring water to the eye—than laughter to the lip.

Short and sharp is the utterance, "Let the dead bury their dead: but you go and preach the kingdom of God." "If you were of the world—the world would love its own; but because you are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hates you." "In the world you shall have tribulation, but be of good cheer; for I have overcome the world." "I have given them Your Word, and the world has hated them, because they are not of the world, even as I am not of the world." "My kingdom is not of this world."

These passages are hard to reconcile with the modern idea of the Church providing recreation for those who have no taste for more serious things—in other words, of pleasing the world. If they teach anything at all, it is that fidelity to Christ will bring down the world's wrath—and that Christ intended His disciples to share with Him, the world's scorn and rejection. How did Jesus act? What were the methods of the only perfectly "faithful witness" the Father has ever had?

As none will question that He is to be the worker's model, let us gaze upon Him. How significant the introductory account given by Mark, "Now, after John was put in prison, Jesus came into Galilee preaching the Gospel of the kingdom of God, and saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand. Repent! and believe the Gospel." And again, in the same chapter, I find Him saying, in answer to the announcement of His disciples, that all men were seeking for Him, "Let us go into the next towns that I may preach there also, for therefore came I forth." Matthew tells us, "And it came to pass when Jesus had made an end of commanding His twelve disciples, He departed thence to teach and preach in their cities." In answer to John's question, "Are You the one who is to come?" He replies, "Go and show John those things which you do hear and see . . . and the poor have the Gospel preached to them." There is no item in the catalogue for providing amusement, such as: "And provide the people with innocent recreation."

We are not left in doubt as to the matter of His preaching, for "when many were gathered together, insomuch that there was no room to receive them, no, not so much as about the door, He preached the Word unto them." There was no change of method adopted by the Lord during His course of ministry. His first word of command to His evangelists was, "As you go, preach!" His last command was, "Preach the Gospel to every creature." None of the gospels suggests that at any time during His ministry, He turned aside from preaching—to entertain, and so attract the people. He was in solemn earnestness, and his ministry was as earnest as Himself. Had He been less uncompromising, and introduced more of the "bright and pleasant" element into His ministry, He would have been more popular.

Yet, when many of His disciples turned away, because of the searching nature of His preaching, I do not find there was any attempt to increase a diminished congregation, by resorting to something more pleasant to the flesh. I do not hear Him saying, "We must keep up the gatherings at any cost! So run after those people, Peter, and tell them we will have a different style of service tomorrow! Something very short and attractive, with little, if any, preaching. Today was a service for God, but tomorrow we will have a pleasant evening for the people. Tell them they will be sure to enjoy it, and have a pleasant time. Be quick, Peter! We must get the people somehow; if not by Gospel, then by entertainment!" No, this was not how He argued. Gazing in sorrow on those who would not hear the Word, He simply turns to the twelve, and asks, "Will you go away also?"

Jesus pitied sinners, pleaded with them, sighed over them, warned them, and wept over them; but He never sought to amuse them! When the evening shadows of His consecrated life were deepening into the night of death, He reviewed His holy ministry, and found comfort and sweet solace in the thought, "I have given them Your Word." As with the Master, so with His apostles- their teaching is the echo of His. In vain will the epistles be searched to discover any trace of a gospel of amusement. The same call for separation from the world rings in everyone, "But not conformed to this world, but be you transformed," is the word of command in the Romans. "Come out from among them. and be you separate and touch not the unclean thing." It is the trumpet call in the Corinthians. In other words it is come out - keep out - keep clean out - for "what communion has light with darkness, and what concord has Christ with Belial?"

"God forbid that I should glory, save in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom the world is crucified unto me and J unto the world." Here is the true relationship between the Church and the world according to the Epistle to the Galatians. "Do not be partakers with them. Have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them," is the attitude enjoined in Ephesians. "That you may be blameless and pure, children of God who are faultless in a crooked and perverted generation, among whom you shine like stars in the world. Hold firmly the message of life," is the word in Philippians. "Dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world," says the Epistle to the Colossians, "Abstain from all appearance of evil" is the demand in Thessalonians.

"If anyone purifies himself from these things, he will be a special instrument, set apart, useful to the Master, prepared for every good work," is the word to Timothy. "Let us then go to Him outside the camp, bearing His disgrace," is the heroic summons of the Hebrews. James, with holy severity, declares that "Friendship with the world is enmity with God; whoever, therefore, will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God." Peter writes: "As obedient children, do not be conformed to the desires of your former ignorance but, as the One who called you is holy, you also are to be holy in all your conduct; for it is written—Be holy, because I am holy." John writes a whole epistle, the gist of which is, "Do not love the world or the things that belong to the world. If anyone loves the world, love for the Father is not in him. For everything that belongs to the world—the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride in one’s lifestyle—is not from the Father, but is from the world. And the world with its lust is passing away, but the one who does God's will remains forever."

Here are the teachings of the apostles concerning the relationship of the Church and the world. And yet, in the face of them, what do we see and hear? A friendly compromise between the two—and an insane effort to please and amuse the world. God help us, and dispel the strong delusion. How did the apostles carry on their mission work? Was it in harmony with their teaching? Let the Acts of the Apostles give the answer.

Anything approaching the worldly amusements of today, is conspicuous by its absence. The early evangelists had boundless confidence in the power of the Gospel, and employed no other weapon. Pentecost followed plain preaching. When Peter and John had been locked up for the night for preaching—the early Church had a prayer meeting. Directly they returned, and the petition offered for the two was, "And now, Lord, grant unto Your servants, that with all boldness they may speak Your word." They had no thought of praying, "Grant unto Your servants more wisdom, that by a wise and discriminating use of innocent recreation, they may avoid the offence of the cross, and sweetly show the unsaved, how happy and merry a lot we are."

The charge brought against the apostles was, "You have filled Jerusalem with your doctrine." Not much chance of this charge being brought against modern methods! The description of their work is, "And daily in the temple, and in every house, they ceased not to teach and preach Jesus Christ." Then, it they "ceased not" from this, they had no time for arranging for entertainments! They gave themselves continually to the ministry of the Word. Scattered by persecution, the early disciples "Went everywhere, preaching the Word."

When Philip went to Samaria, and was the means of bringing "great joy to that city," the only recorded method is, "He preached Christ unto them." When the apostles went to visit the scene of his labors, it is stated, "And they, when they had testified and preached the Word of the Lord, returned to Jerusalem, and preached the Gospel in many villages of the Samaritans." When they had finished their preaching, it is evident they did not think it was their mission to stay and organize some "pleasant evenings of entertainment" for those people who did not believe.

The congregations in those days did not expect anything but the Word of the Lord, for Cornelius says to Peter, "We are all here in the presence of God—to listen to everything the Lord has commanded you to tell us." The message given was, "Words whereby you and all your house shall be saved." Cause and effect are closely linked in the statement, "Some of them went to Antioch and began to speak to Greeks also, preaching the good news about the Lord Jesus. The Lord's hand was with them, and a great number of people believed and turned to the Lord." Here you have their method—they preached. Their matter—the good news about the Lord Jesus. Their power—the hand of the Lord was with them. Their success—a great number of people believed and turned to the Lord.

What more does the Church of God require today? When Paul and Barnabas worked together, the record is, "The Lord gave testimony unto the Word of His grace," When Paul, in a vision, hears a man of Macedonia saying, "Come over and help us," he assuredly understands that the Lord had called him to preach the Gospel unto them. Why so? How did he know, but that the help needed was the brightening of their lives by a little amusement, or the refining of their manners by a collection of paintings? He never thought of such things! "Come and help us!" meant to him, "Preach the Gospel." "As his custom was, Paul went into the synagogue, and on three Sabbath days he reasoned with them from the Scriptures, explaining and proving that the Christ had to suffer and rise from the dead." That was the "custom" of evangelistic work in those days, and it seems to have been wonderfully powerful; for the verdict of the people is, "These who have turned the world upside down—have come here also!" Just now, the world is turning the Church upside down; that is the only difference.

When God told Paul that He had many people in Corinth, I read, "And he continued there a year and six months, teaching the Word of God among them." Evidently then, he judged that the only way to save them, was by the Word. A year and a half—and only one method adopted. Wonderful! Our modern preachers would have had a dozen methods in that time! But then Paul never reckoned that providing something pleasant for the ungodly, was part of his ministry; for, on his way to Jerusalem and martyrdom, he says, "But I count my life of no value to myself, so that I may finish my course and the ministry I received from the Lord Jesus—to testify to the gospel of God's grace." This was all the ministry he knew.

The last description we have of the methods of this prince of evangelists, is consistent with all that has gone before, "For two whole years Paul stayed there in his own rented house and welcomed all who came to see him. Boldly and without hindrance he preached the kingdom of God and taught about the Lord Jesus Christ." What a contrast to all the rot and nonsense now being perpetrated in the holy name of Christ! May the Lord clear the Church of all the rubbish that the devil has imposed upon her, and bring us back again to apostolic methods!


Church amusements are not spiritually fruitful

Lastly, the mission of amusement utterly falls to effect the desired end among the unsaved; but it works havoc among the young converts. Were it a success, it would be none the less wrong. Success belongs to God. Faithfulness to His instructions is my only responsibility

Nonetheless, providing amusements for the people is a contemptible failure. Let us see the converts who have been won by amusement. Let the harlots and the drunkards, to whom a dramatic entertainment has been God's first link in the chain of their conversion stand forth. Let the careless and the scoffers who have cause to thank God that the Church has relaxed her spirit of separation and met them half-way in their worldliness, speak and testify. Let the husbands, wives, and children, who have been saved by church amusements, tell out their joy. Let the weary, heavy-laden souls who have found peace through a pleasing concert, no longer keep silence. Let the men and women who have found Christ through the reversal of apostolic methods declare the same, and show the greatness of Paul's blunder when he said, "I determined not to know anything among you—but Jesus Christ, and Him crucified." There is neither voice nor any to answer. The failure is on a par with the folly—and as huge as the sin! Out of thousands with whom I have personally conversed, the mission of amusement has claimed no convert!

Now let the appeal be made to those who, repudiating every other method, have staked everything on the preaching of the Gospel. Let them be challenged to produce results. There is no need. Blazing sacrifices on every hand attest the answer. Ten thousand times ten thousand voices are ready to declare that the plain preaching of the Word was, first and last—the cause of their salvation!

But how about the other side of this matter—what are baneful effects of providing entertainment? Are they innocent? I will here solemnly as before the Lord, give my personal testimony. Though I have never seen a sinner saved by amusements, I have seen any number of backsliders manufactured by this new departure from the Scripture. Over and over again have they come to me in tears, and asked what they were to do, as they had lost all their peace and fallen into evil. Over and over again has the confession been made, "I began to go wrong by attending worldly amusements that Christians patronized." It is not very long since that a young man, in an agony of soul, said to me, "I never thought of going to the theater—until my minister put it into my heart by preaching that there was no harm in it. I went, and it has led me from bad to worse—and now I am a miserable backslider; and he is responsible for it."

When professors begin to forsake the gatherings for prayer, and grow worldly, I almost always find that worldly Christianity is responsible for the first downward step. The mission of amusements is the devil's half-way house to the world! It is because of what I have seen that I feel deeply, and would sincerely write strongly. This thing is working rottenness in the Church of God, and blasting her service for the King. In the guise of Christianity, it is accomplishing the devil's own work! Under the pretense of going out to reach the world—it is carrying our sons and daughters into the world, With the plea of "Do not alienate the masses with your strictness," it is seducing the young disciples from the simplicity and the purity of the Gospel. Professing to win the world, it is turning the garden of the Lord into a public recreation ground! To fill the church with those who see no beauty in Christ—a grinning Dragon is put over the doorway!

It will be no wonder if the Holy Spirit, grieved and insulted, withdraws His presence; for "What harmony can there be between Christ and the Devil?"

"Come out!" is the call for today! Sanctify yourselves! Put away the evil from among you. Cast down the world's altars and cut down her groves. Spurn her offered assistance. Decline her help, as your Master did the testimony of devils, for "He did not allow them to speak, because they knew Him." Renounce all the worldly policy of the age. Trample upon Saul's armor. Grasp the Book of God. Trust the Spirit who wrote its pages. Fight with this weapon—only and always. Cease to amuse—and seek to arouse with the preaching of the Word. Shun the clap of a delighted audience, and listen for the sobs of a convicted one. Give up trying to "please" men who have only the thickness of the ribs between their souls and hell! Warn, and plead, and entreat—as those who see the fires of eternity about to devour the lost!

Let the Church again confront the world—testify against it—and meet it only behind the cross! And, like her Lord, she shall overcome, and with Him share the victory!
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Charles Fry at 1 Comments Links to this post

Bible Doctrine For Older Children


By James W. Beeke

Bible Doctrine for Older Children is a two volume series consisting of twenty chapters which contain simple explanations of all major biblical doctrines. Book A contains chapters 1-10 and Book B chapters 11-20. The explanations were written for children eleven years of age and older. This series contains more than 150 stories and illustrations to help explain the doctrinal concepts being taught.

These books were written for home, personal, or family reading; school Bible doctrine teaching; or church catechetical instruction.

Book A
Chapter

1. Introduction, God’s Revelation, The Bible
2. God’s Names, God’s Attributes, The Trinity
3. God’s Decree, Predestination
4. God’s Creation, Angels
5. God’s Providence
6. The Creation of Man, The Image of God, Man’s Soul and Body, The Covenant of Works
7. The Fall of Man, Sin, Death
8. The Covenant of Grace
9. The Mediator, The Natures of Jesus Christ, The Names of Jesus Christ
10. The Offices of Jesus Christ, The States of Jesus Christ

Buy book A here

Book B
Chapter

11. Doctrinal Standards,
Creeds,
The Five Points of Calvinism
12. Calling, 
Regeneration,
Conversion
13. Faith,
Types of Faith
14. Justification, Sanctification
15. Prayer
16. The Church,
The Church Offices,
Church Government,
Church Discipline
17. The Means of Grace,
God’s Word,
God’s Law and Gospel
18. God’s Sacraments,
Holy Baptism
19. The Lord’s Supper
20. The Soul After Death,
Christ’s Second Coming,
The Resurrection of the Dead,
The Final Judgment,
Eternity


Buy book B here
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Charles Fry at 0 Comments Links to this post

Bible Doctrine for Younger Children


By James W. Beeke

Bible Doctrine for Younger Children is a two volume series consisting of twenty chapters which contain simple explanations of all major biblical doctrines. Book A contains chapters 1-10 and Book B chapters 11-20. The explanations were written for children nine years of age and older. This series contains more than 150 stories and illustrations to help explain the doctrinal concepts being taught.

These books were written for home, personal, or family reading; school Bible doctrine teaching; or church catechetical instruction.

Book A
Chapter
1. Bible Doctrine, God Reveals Himself,
The Bible
2. One God
God’s Attributes,
The Trinity,
God’s Decrees
3. God’s Creation,
God’s Providence
4. Creation of Man,
The Covenant of Works
5. The Fall of Man,
Sin, 
Death
6. God’s Law,
The First Table of God’s Moral Law
7. The Second Table of God’s Moral Law
8. The Covenant of Grace
9. The Mediator,
The Two Natures of Jesus Christ,
The Name of Jesus Christ
10. The Offices of Jesus Christ,
The States of Jesus Christ


Buy book A here

Book B
Chapter

11. Calling, 
Regeneration,
Conversion
12. Faith,
Types of Faith
13. Justification,
Sanctification
14. Prayer
15. The Church,
The Church Offices
16. Doctrinal Standards,
Creeds,
The Five Points of Calvinism
17. The Means of Grace,
God’s Word,
God’s Sacraments
18. Holy Baptism
19. The Lord’s Supper
20. The Soul After Death,
Christ’s Second Coming,
The Resurrection of the Dead,
The Final Judgment,
Eternity


Buy book B here
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Charles Fry at 0 Comments Links to this post

Charismatic Chaos

Bookmark and Share
> posted by Charles Fry at 4 Comments Links to this post

King David's city of Sha'arayim identified

Good morning everyone,

I just came across the following story. I have not had time to do more research on it. When I find more information I will post it.


Archeology: King David's city of Sha'arayim identified

Elah Fortress excavation yields monumental find – second gate to the city, leading experts to believe site was the ancient city of Sha'arayim, which literally means two gates

The Elah Fortress excavation, being developed by Foundation Stone under the direction of Professor Yosef Garfinkel, Yigal Yadin Chair of Archeology at The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, has announced the discovery of a second monumental find in as many months.



Archeologists digging at the site have uncovered a second gate to the city. This “two-gate” feature is the only one of its kind found in the Kingdoms of Judah or Israel to date and is understood by Professor Garfinkel as revealing the Biblical name of the city: “Sha’arayim” – literally meaning two gates.

The second gate was discovered in recent weeks as part of ongoing excavations at this site which has already yielded numerous historic finds. The gate faces an easterly direction, towards Jerusalem. Already proven to be a Judean city, this latest find lends further credence to the assumption that it was part of a regional governing system connected to King David. The gate is comprised of massive stones, each weighing about 10 tons, leading archeologists to conclude that the fortification of the city was orchestrated by some form of centralized government.


Carbon 14 dating conducted on burnt olive pits uncovered at the site have already concluded that the city was active in 1,000-965 BC, during the time of King David.

The discovery is the first ever of an Iron Age fortified city with two gates. Coupled with the location of the Elah Fortress in close proximity to the Biblical strongholds of Socho an Azekah, numerous factors are leading Professor Garfinkel to conclude that the Fortress is in fact the Juadaen city of Sha’arayim.


“This discovery is critical towards our further appreciation of the enormous historic value this site played in the kingdom of Judah.” said Barnea Selevan, co-Director of Foundation Stone, the organization leading the development of the Elah Fortress including its educational components for visitation and participation by students and the general public in the excavations. Sha’arayim appears three times in the Bible and the city is twice linked to King David.

The find of the second gate follows the discovery of an ostracon (pottery shard inscribed with writing in ink) also within the Elah Fortress site. The writing visible on the pottery piece is believed to be the earliest and longest known ancient Hebrew text ever found.

Uncovering two discoveries of such substantial importance in such a short period of time is almost unprecedented in the field of Biblical archeology,” said Professor Garfinkel. “With only a small percentage of the site dug so far, we are very excited about what we will continue to find in the period ahead.”

Here is the link to the original article: David




If you are interested in the subject of Biblical Archaeology check out this:

Insight's Archaeology Handbook

Insight’s Archaeology Handbook, is one of the finest handbooks we’ve ever produced. Full of color photos, you’ll read and learn about ten key archaeological discoveries and how they support the historical accuracy of God’s Word.

At Insight for Living we are constantly developing tools to encourage you as you seek to grow in your relationship with Jesus Christ and in your knowledge of the Bible. You will find this wonderful book both highly readable and utterly fascinating, as it sheds light on the various historical people, places, and events mentioned in the Bible.

Insight’s Archaeology Handbook will help you deepen your understanding of the Scriptures by bringing to life the stories you’ve read and heard.

118-page softcover book


You can buy the book at this link: Book
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Christians And Church Attendance

Bookmark and Share
> posted by Charles Fry at 0 Comments Links to this post

Rob Bell Part 2

Here is part 2 of our look at Rob Bell. The article was written by Eric Mire.


Rob Bell Part 2

DUST

Rob Bell begins his teaching by explaining how he has recently learned more about himself through the story of Jesus walking on the water and rebuking Peter for his lack of faith found in Matthew 14:22-33. Rob doesn’t simply expound on the text but takes the listener on to a historical understanding of Jewish Rabbis. He explains how in Jewish culture, young children around the age of 6 would go to school to learn the Torah, in what was known as “Bait Torah.” They would be taught by a local rabbi until the age of 10, and upon completion would have the entire Torah memorized. Most of the children after the age of 10 would move on to learn the family trade, but the “best of the best” would move on to the 2nd level of training called “Bait Talmud.” At the conclusion of “Bait Talmud,” around the age of 14 or 15, the child would be able to memorize all of the Jewish scriptures—Genesis to Malachi. From this group of kids, the “best of the best of the best” would move on the next level of education known as the “Bait Midrash.” In order to be accepted into the “Bait Midrash” the student would have to find a specific rabbi to apply to and become the rabbi’s disciple. Rob says that a disciple is “deeper than a student” because the disciple “wants to be like the rabbi, and do what the rabbi does.” Each rabbi would have different interpretations of scripture, known as the “rabbi’s yoke.”

A disciple would want to take on the “rabbi’s yoke in order to know what the rabbi knows, to be able to do what the rabbi does, in order to be like the rabbi.” The rabbi would then “grill” the student with questions and testing to see if the student could be a valid follower. If the rabbi doesn’t think the student can follow him, he gently releases him to go back and learn “the family trade.” However, if the rabbi thinks a student can be a good follower, the rabbi would invite the student to “follow me.” The young 15 year old kid would then leave “family, friends, synagogue, and village to devote your entire life to being like your rabbi. This is what it means to be a disciple.” So the student would daily walk with the rabbi through the hot desert terrain and by the end of the day “you would be caked in whatever your rabbi stepped in.” Rob explains that there was a saying among the sage’s and wise men of the day—“may you be covered in the dust of your rabbi.” Hence the title “Dust.”


Rob moves on to explain how Jesus began His ministry as a rabbi at the age of 30 (which is the common age of a new rabbi), and how Jesus was revolutionary based on the fact that He went to fisherman to call them to be His disciples instead of a young, bright child who was schooled in the “Bait Talmud.” They are not the “best of the best.” But the rabbi Jesus who is the “best of the best of the best” calls them to be his disciples. This explains why they would be so eager to “drop their nets at once and follow him.”


Back to the story of Jesus walking on water; why would Peter’s first response be, “if it’s you Lord tell me to come to you?” Rob’s explanation is because as a disciple Peter has organized his whole life around Jesus, “he’s dedicated his whole life to do what he sees his rabbi doing.” So as Peter sees his rabbi walking on water, he too wants to walk on water. Peter begins to walk on water and then starts to sink and calls out for Jesus. Jesus’ response was “O you of little faith, why did you doubt?”


*HERESY ALERT* Now this is the most crucial part of Rob’s whole lesson, and even though the historical context can have some validity to it, this is where Rob takes you into heresy. Rob states that he always assumed “that Peter doubts Jesus, but Jesus isn’t sinking. So who does Peter doubt? He doubts himself. He loses faith in himself that he could actually be like his rabbi. Jesus wouldn’t have called him if he didn’t think Peter could be like him, Jesus even reminds his disciples at one point when he says, ‘You didn’t choose me, I chose you,’ the rabbi doesn’t choose you unless the rabbi thinks you can do what he does, that you can be like him. All my life I heard about people believing in God, but God believes in us, in you, in me. Faith in Jesus is important, but what about Jesus’ faith in us? He must have faith in us because he leaves it all in the hands of the disciples… He leaves it in the hands of these anybodies and they do it. What if we could actually be the kind of people that lived like Jesus lived?”


Now this is incredibly dangerous. Rob Bell is a great communicator and teacher. However, when he comes to his conclusions on a passage using his understanding of historical contexts, they end with a self-exaltation of interpretation. What is completely missing from this study of Jesus and Peter walking on water is the doctrine of total depravity, man’s need for salvation, the doctrine of sanctification, and the work of the Holy Spirit in our lives. I’m not going to critique Rob Bell’s explanation on Jewish education and culture because it is not detrimental to your eternal salvation as much as the “believing in yourself” worldview is.

Let’s start by explaining what the parable is supposed to show us. This parable is supposed to show us that Jesus is the Christ. He is all-powerful over creation and He can do what we can’t do. Peter sinking shows us our need for a savior.

I honestly do not know why Peter would have been so bold as to want to get out of the boat in the first place, but it is a good illustration for us today to understand that we are to keep our faith on Christ alone. There will always be trials; we do not seek Jesus for the absence of trials because inside and outside the boat the waters were fierce, but Jesus is Lord over all creation and sovereign over all life’s happenings. This is not an illustration of a disciple following a rabbi, but of Christ being a savior, a call to perseverance, and our Lord’s ability to deliver us. It is the complete opposite of “having faith in ourselves.”

Here are a few scriptures to show us that we are to not have faith in ourselves, please read them carefully and understand that this is God’s Word written to you: Jer. 17:7-9; Isaiah 64:1-7; Psalm 51:5; Romans 3:10-18; Romans 5:12; John 6:44; Ephesians 2:1-10. All of these scriptures were given to us by God to show us our sin and need for a savior. Because we are sinners, then there is no way we can be like the rabbi through our own strength, wisdom, or abilities. Jesus has come not show us a better way to live, but to quench the wrath of God brought on by our sinfulness. The only one we are to believe in is Jesus Christ, because without Him you are dead in your trespasses. Your walking on water is really a bloated body faced down if you believe in yourself.


The next error that needs to be refuted through scripture is the idea that we can be like Jesus because “he chose you.” There is some truth to this because this falls in line with the doctrine of sanctification, but Rob Bell does not explain it as such. He does not explain our total dependence on God to make us holy. Sanctification is an ongoing process that Christians must go through, and cannot do so by believing in ourselves. In my honest opinion, I don’t think there is many people out there today who don’t want to be like Jesus, believers or non-believers. Who wouldn’t want to command nature to do what they want it to do. Who wouldn’t want to have the power that Jesus had. Who wouldn’t want to have a following like Jesus attained. But this is not the Jesus that sanctification aims us to become like. Sanctification aims at producing fruit in our lives. Read Galatians 5:16-26. If your idea of the outcome of following Jesus does not line up with the fruit of the Spirit, then you do not have a proper understanding of God’s will in sanctification for you while here on earth. Read Romans 7. By this point in Romans, Paul has already addressed the depravity of mankind, our need for a savior, how to attain salvation, and now begins to speak on how sanctification works in the life of a believer. We will always struggle with the sin nature, but must “walk in the Spirit to not fulfill the lusts of the flesh.” And realize that sanctification will not be complete until we die and go to be with Him (if in fact you are saved). Read 1 Cor. 15:42-29. This shows us that you will not be able to fully be like your rabbi here on earth, but we must wait for the day that our heavenly body’s “bear the image of the Man of heaven.”


SMALL GROUP QUESTIONS FROM THE WORKBOOK: My answers will be in italic.

1) Have you ever thought about Jesus as your rabbi? Not in the historical context that Rob uses.

2) Would you consider yourself a disciple? A biblical disciple; I strive to be… A “belief in myself” disciple; God forbid.

3) Have you ever thought about your faith as being an interpretation? What?!?

4) Is it okay to have different interpretations of the Scriptures? No because there is only one truth, and truth is not relative.

5) What message was Jesus sending us by not choosing the best of the best? It wasn’t to show us that He believes in us… it was to gather a group of men that had not been corrupted by the “leaven of the Pharisees and the Sadducees.” And also to show us God’s election not man’s election, so that no one could boast of being worthy.

6) What impact are Christians today having on the course of human history? We’re making the top 50 influential lists and teaching a different Jesus.

7) How big of a role do your insecurities play in your life? I constantly need a hug and someone to validate my worth and increase my self-esteem.

8) Do they ever affect your faith? If my faith revolves around myself, then my faith is already negatively affected.

9) Do you believe that God believes in you? NO HE DOES NOT! IF HE DID HE WOULDN’T HAVE SENT HIS ONLY BEGOTTEN SON TO DIE IN MY PLACE!

10) What does it mean to be like Jesus? To be sanctified according to scripture, not try to be all-powerful like He is. He is God and I cannot be God too.

11) Can you do it? He alone can do it. He alone is my Savior. He alone justifies and sanctifies me. I am not and never will be God. All people should be careful of this teaching because it leads you to self-exaltation, self-glorification and finally the condemning sin of self-deification.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 2 Comments Links to this post

Sunday, November 23, 2008

365 Days With Calvin


Here is the perfect Christmas gift:

365 days with Calvin—A unique collection of 365 readings from the writings of John Calvin, selected and edited by Joel R Beeke

John Calvin exercised a profound ministry in Europe, and is probably one of the most seminal thinkers ever to have lived. A godly pastor, theologian and preacher, he led his flock by example and worked hard to establish consistent godliness in his city. A prolific writer, his sermons, letters, and, of course, his ‘Christian Institutes’ have been published again and again. His writings—once described as ‘flowing prose’—are characterized by clarity, simplicity, and yet profoundness, too. In these heart-warming pieces, drawn from his commentaries and sermons, Calvin brings us to Christ, the glorious Savior of all his people.

Buy it Here.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Charles Fry at 2 Comments Links to this post

Saturday, November 22, 2008

CUTTING

What Is Cutting?
Injuring yourself on purpose by making scratches or cuts on your body with a sharp object — enough to break the skin and make it bleed — is called cutting. Cutting is a type of self-injury, or SI. Most people who cut are girls, but guys self-injure, too. People who cut usually start cutting in their young teens. Some continue to cut into adulthood
People may cut themselves on their wrists, arms, legs, or bellies. Some people self-injure by burning their skin with the end of a cigarette or lighted match.

When cuts or burns heal, they often leave scars or marks. People who injure themselves usually hide the cuts and marks and sometimes no one else knows.

Why Do People Cut Themselves?
It can be hard to understand why people cut themselves on purpose. Cutting is a way some people try to cope with the pain of strong emotions, intense pressure, or upsetting relationship problems. They may be dealing with feelings that seem too difficult to bear, or bad situations they think can't change.

Some people cut because they feel desperate for relief from bad feelings. People who cut may not know better ways to get relief from emotional pain or pressure. Some people cut to express strong feelings of rage, sorrow, rejection, desperation, longing, or emptiness.

There are other ways to cope with difficulties, even big problems and terrible emotional pain. The help of a mental health professional might be needed for major life troubles or overwhelming emotions. For other tough situations or strong emotions, it can help put things in perspective to talk problems over with parents, other adults, or friends. Getting plenty of exercise can also help put problems in perspective and help balance emotions.

But people who cut may not have developed ways to cope. Or their coping skills may be overpowered by emotions that are too intense. When emotions don't get expressed in a healthy way, tension can build up — sometimes to a point where it seems almost unbearable. Cutting may be an attempt to relieve that extreme tension. For some, it seems like a way of feeling in control.

The urge to cut might be triggered by strong feelings the person can't express — such as anger, hurt, shame, frustration, or alienation. People who cut sometimes say they feel they don't fit in or that no one understands them. A person might cut because of losing someone close or to escape a sense of emptiness. Cutting might seem like the only way to find relief or express personal pain over relationships or rejection.

People who cut or self-injure sometimes have other mental health problems that contribute to their emotional tension. Cutting is sometimes (but not always) associated with depression, bipolar disorder, eating disorders, obsessive thinking, or compulsive behaviors. It can also be a sign of mental health problems that cause people to have trouble controlling their impulses or to take unnecessary risks. Some people who cut themselves have problems with drug or alcohol abuse.

Some people who cut have had a traumatic experience, such as living through abuse, violence, or a disaster. Self-injury may feel like a way of "waking up" from a sense of numbness after a traumatic experience. Or it may be a way of reinflicting the pain they went through, expressing anger over it, or trying to get control of it.


Here is the link from which the above information was found: Cutting








Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 2 Comments Links to this post

Great Music From Skillet!





Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

TRUE SECURITY














Here are the lyrics:


Verse 1:
There's a young girl, up in her teenage years
Up in tha world, thrivin with teenage peers
Popular but there's one thing to be made clear
Low self esteem was tha reason for her teenage tears
She thought she was pretty enough or cool as tha next chick
She thought she wasn't skinny enough so dudes she would mess wit
So they'd be chillin wit her and she'd feel accepted
But in the end it would suck cause she'd still get rejected
And nah she couldn't really see seekin the Lord but
Thought she could find peace in an eatin disorder
Every time she'd lose 10 and said just 10 more but
Her friends all confused like you what you do this for huh?
And she started to cling to this foolish disorder
She figured it's all she had if tha students ignored her
Dag, I'm praying for my sister
That she would cling to God that can save and deliver

Hook:
I'm praying for my sister
That she would cling to the God that can save and deliver
True security is found in Christ
He'll never leave you, He's down and around for life
(Repeat)

Verse 2:
There's a young dude, up in his teenage years
Huggin tha block to fit in wit his teenage peers
He still doesn't it's one thing to be made clear
Not bein down with tha rest is his teenage fear
See where he come from, sellin work ain't that crazy
And it's few cats his age that ain't had babies
All he wanna do is lay around and hang out crazy
Maybe smoke something, drank got his vision hazy
Plus he just got that new Jeezy cd
Wanna be like them D boys he see on TV
Heard of church but ain't got a suit that's three piece
So he think it that just ain't for him
But some girls down tha block wanna date from him
Bout a decade down tha road his baby will be 10
But he'll be locked up I'm prayin for my brother
That he would cling to the God that can save when we suffer

Hook:
I'm praying for my brother
That he would cling to the God that can save when we suffer
True security is found in Christ
He'll never leave you, He's down and around for life
(Repeat)

Verse 3:
Another young one, up in they teenage years
Put on a pedestal above all they teenage peers
Father's a pastor and one thing that he made clear
We serve Christ, but daddy couldn't see they tears
See they felt insufficient, like they could not match
Up to Dad, no matter how much good they stacked
Like they was failin every single test they facin
Felt like Satan next to the expectations
Suicidal thoughts, ran through they brain
Had dreams of killin, but self is who they'd slain
Didn't realize that Christ is perfect in our weakness
So they tried to hide it like they life was sweetness
Frontin in front of fam even quotin scripture
But just couldn't understand He who wrote the scripture
Dag I'm prayin for my family
That we would realize He died so guys would have a plan B

Hook
I'm prayin for my sister
That she would cling to the God who can save and deliver
True security is found in Christ
He'll never leave you, He's down and around for life
I'm prayin for my brothers
That we would cling to the God who can save when we suffer
True security is found in Christ
He'll never leave you, He's down and around for life
I'm prayin for family
That we would realize He died so guys would have a plan B
True security is found in Christ
He'll never leave you, He's down and around for life
I'm prayin for family
That we would realize He died so guys would have a plan B
True security is found in Christ
He'll never leave you, He's down and around for life
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Christ The King Sunday












This Sunday is the last Sunday of the church year. Next Sunday is the beginning of Advent ans is the fist Sunday of the new church year. For many the last Sunday of the church year is known as, Christ The King Sunday. I want to share the history of this day and some information about it.



From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Christ the King, a detail from the Ghent Altarpiece by Jan van Eyck.Christ the King is a title of Jesus based on several passages of Scripture and used by all Christians. Many denominations, including Catholics, Anglicans, Episcopalians, Presbyterians, and some Lutherans and Methodists, celebrate, in honour of Christ under this title, the Feast of Christ the King on the last Sunday of the liturgical year, before a new year begins with the First Sunday of Advent (the earliest date of which is 27 November). The Feast of Christ the King is thus on the Sunday that falls between 20 and 26 November, inclusive (however, the Catholic calendar of pre-Vatican II had this feast on the last Sunday of October).


The name is found in various forms in scripture: King Eternal (1 Timothy 1:17), King of Israel (John 1:49), King of the Jews (Mt. 27:11), King of kings (1 Tim 6:15; Rev. 19:16), King of the Ages (Book of Revelation 15:3) and Ruler of the Kings of the Earth (Rev. 1:5).

The ideological movement of Christ's Kingship was addressed in the encyclical Quas Primas of Pope Pius XI, published in 1925, which has been called "possibly one of the most misunderstood and ignored encyclicals of all time." The Pontiff's encyclical quotes with approval Cyril of Alexandria, noting that Jesus' Kingship is not obtained by violence: "'Christ,' he says, 'has dominion over all creatures, a dominion not seized by violence nor usurped, but his by essence and by nature.'"

Pope Benedict XVI has remarked that Christ's Kingship is not based on "human power" but on loving and serving others. The perfect exemplar of that acceptance, he pointed out, is the Virgin Mary. Her humble and unconditional acceptance of God's will in her life.


You can read the encyclical of Pope Pius XI here:
QUAS PRIMAS (On the Feast of Christ the King)
Pope Pius XI





Here are the scripture readings for this Sunday:
Ezekiel 34:11-12, 15-17
Psalm 23:1-3, 5-6
1 Corinthians 15:20-26, 28
Matthew 25:31-46


Take some time today and read these passages of scripture and see what you can learn about Christ as King.


A Catholic source said it this way:

Sunday's Mass also describes the qualities of Christ's kingdom. This kingdom is: 1) supreme, extending not only to all peoples but also to their princes and kings; 2) universal, extending to all nations and to all places; 3) eternal, for "The Lord shall sit a King forever"; 4) spiritual, Christ's "kingdom is not of this world".
With an ever-growing desire, all Advent awaits the "coming King"; in the chants of the breviary we find repeated again and again the two expressions "King" and "is coming." On Christmas the Church would greet, not the Child of Bethlehem, but the Rex Pacificus — "the King of peace gloriously reigning." Within a fortnight, there follows a feast which belongs to the greatest of the feasts of the Church year -- the Epiphany. As in ancient times oriental monarchs visited their principalities (theophany), so the divine King appears in His city, the Church; from its sacred precincts He casts His glance over all the world....On the final feast of the Christmas cycle, the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary, holy Church meets her royal Bridegroom with virginal love: "Adorn your bridal chamber, O Sion, and receive Christ your King!" The burden of the Christmas cycle may be summed up in these words: Christ the King establishes His Kingdom of light upon earth!

If we now consider the Easter cycle, the luster of Christ's royal dignity is indeed somewhat veiled by His sufferings; nevertheless, it is not the suffering Jesus who is present to the eyes of the Church as much as Christ the royal Hero and Warrior who upon the battlefield of Golgotha struggles with the mighty and dies in triumph. Even during Lent and Passiontide the Church acclaims her King. The act of homage on Palm Sunday is intensely stirring; singing psalms in festal procession we accompany our Savior singing: Gloria, laus et honor tibi sit, Rex Christe, "Glory, praise and honor be to Thee, Christ, O King!" It is true that on Good Friday the Church meditates upon the Man of Sorrows in agony upon the Cross, but at the same time, and perhaps more so, she beholds Him as King upon a royal throne. The hymn Vexilla Regis, "The royal banners forward go," is the more perfect expression of the spirit from which the Good Friday liturgy has arisen. Also characteristic is the verse from Psalm 95, Dicite in gentibus quia Dominus regnavit, to which the early Christians always added, a ligno, "Proclaim among the Gentiles: the Lord reigns from upon the tree of the Cross!" During Paschal time the Church is so occupied with her glorified Savior and Conqueror that kingship references become rarer; nevertheless, toward the end of the season we celebrate our King's triumph after completing the work of redemption, His royal enthronement on Ascension Thursday.

Neither in the time after Pentecost is the picture of Christ as King wholly absent from the liturgy. Corpus Christi is a royal festival: "Christ the King who rules the nations, come, let us adore" (Invit.). In the Greek Church the feast of the Transfiguration is the principal solemnity in honor of Christ's kingship, Summum Regem gloriae Christum adoremus (Invit.). Finally at the sunset of the ecclesiastical year, the Church awaits with burning desire the return of the King of Majesty.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Friday, November 21, 2008

Rob Bell Part 1
















There has been a lot written about Pastor Rob Bell across the Internet. His teaching is influencing many people. I begin to do a little research on him and I felt that his teaching could be dangerous and needed to be addressed. Erick Mire is a young man who attends my church. I spoke with him about Rob Bell and he begin to tell me about is exposure to his teaching. After we talked, I decided he would be a good person to write a few articles about his experience and what he thinks of Rob Bell's teaching.

So here is

Rob Bell Part 1
by
Erick Mire




For the last few years I have been a part of numerous college small groups and Bible studies. I was even asked to be the head of the college ministry of my former church. During this time, I was exposed to many modern day heretical teachings. At the time I sensed nothing was wrong with the teaching I was hearing because it was being given to me by men I respected, such as my head pastor and youth pastor. For over three years I labored hard in the church, working in two to three ministries at a time. Then finally I crashed and burned. I was completely burned out from Christianity! I became cynical and began to doubt God in many areas. I praise God for pulling me out of that church and opening my eyes to the real problem at hand: False doctrines and false Christianity.


In the last few months of attending my former church, I began to listen to other sermons online from well-respected preachers and noticed significant differences from what I had been hearing in every sermon being preached from my churches pulpit. To sum it up, good sermons teach exaltation of Christ, mankind’s need for a savior, how truth is found in scripture alone, and all other teaching that leads to sound doctrine, but what I was hearing was preaching that catered to self. It’s not about you, but about Christ! That sounds so elemental, but the teaching that I would hear on a regular basis was telling me that Jesus wants me to come to Him for a good life, i.e. good relationships, career planning, financial stability, health and wellness, and more. Sure there would be occasional teachings on how we need to be followers of Christ, but it was all law-based living and never the true Gospel.

Since having my eyes open by our gracious Lord Jesus Christ, I am hungry to know the TRUTH. I am even willing to proclaim it even if my friends hate me for it. All people are totally depraved and will die and go to hell in their sins, unless they believe in the finished work of Jesus Christ. Jesus does not save us from a miserable life, but from a miserable eternity. Wanting Jesus to save you from a miserable life is a Hedonistic view of Jesus.

In this blog, I would like to discuss one of the false teachings that was being presented to me by my former church. It is the video series called “NOOMA” by author and Pastor Rob Bell, the founding pastor of Mars Hill Bible Church in Grandville, Michigan. NOOMA’s website, nooma states Mars Hill Bible Church is “… one of the fastest growing churches in American history.” So as you can see, he is very influential in today’s American Christianity. Rob Bell’s church has even landed the #10 spot on Church Report Magazine’s, “50 Most Influential Churches in America 2007.”

http://www.thecronline.com/mag_article.php?mid=875&mname=January.



As for the NOOMA videos, I will let nooma.com explain what they are intended to be:

“We can get anything we want, from anywhere in the world, whenever we want it. That's how it is and that's how we want it to be. Still, our lives aren't any different than other generations before us. Our time is. We want spiritual direction, but it has to be real for us and available when we need it. We want a new format for getting Christian perspectives.

NOOMA is the new format.

It's short films with communicators that really speak to us. Compact, portable, and concise. Each NOOMA touches on issues that we care about, that we want to talk about, and it comes in a way that fits our world. It's a format that's there for us when we need it, as we need it, how we need it. “

As I mentioned earlier, NOOMA was one of the influential teachings going on in my previous church. It is so influential that earlier this week, a friend of mine who attends college in South Dakota tried to rebuke me for saying anything harsh against Rob Bell. Many, many college age Christians in America either have or possibly will come in contact with a NOOMA video. I realize by doing this blog, there will be many people, especially young people, who will disagree with me. It is my hope and prayer that a reformation would happen in America; that we would reclaim the Jesus of the Bible, and spur ourselves on to Biblical literacy.

Let’s move on now to discussing one of the NOOMA videos. We will look at the 8th installment of the NOOMA-series entitled “Dust.” Each NOOMA package comes with the DVD and small group workbook to engage the topic that Rob Bell presents. The workbook is designed in a very artistic, sort of edgy style. The video, workbook design and layout are specifically geared for a teen-to-college age audience. Inside the workbook there are many questions catered to an open-forum type discussion. From my own personal experience, this is dangerous because there is a lack of pastoral authority among the members to help refute false beliefs. True there may be a college pastor in the group, but most of the time he is a novice, which the Bible warns against. (1 Tim. 3:1-6).

My college pastor at the time was 20 years old and a junior at an undergraduate college, with no real credentials to hold such a position. This is most likely true in a majority of the churches that utilize the NOOMA teachings.



Part 2 will be posted Saturday 22 November, 2008.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Thursday, November 20, 2008

Three Gifts



We’ve got Thanksgiving one week away, and thus the beginning of the Holiday Shopping season starting on Black Friday next week.

So I’d like to share something that may help you not break the bank to buy a plethora of presents for Christmas, as if that previous $4.00/gallon of gas and the DOW drop of the decade aren’t enough help already.

In the story of Jesus’ birth in the Bible, the real Christmas story, Jesus received gifts from the wise-men, and there were only three (3).

If Jesus could make do with only 3 presents for Christmas, so should we.

Of course, the greatest gift Jesus ever received was not from wise-men, but from a wise God who gave Jesus the gift of the Holy Spirit descending upon him like a dove (John 1:32).

…so seek those things which are above…(Colossians 3:1)
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Jason McFadden at 1 Comments Links to this post

Salt Shaking 103



So we Christians are the salty saints of the earth. And the earth definitely does not need to be on a low-sodium diet.

On the contrary, this world needs a lot of salt, enough to give it a heart attack. The lost sinners of the world need to have their heart pricked with the gospel, which starts with a call to repent from sin.

Another thing that can be said about how we apply our salt to the world is that it must be done so in a gentle loving way with compassion.

But have you ever had an open wound and got sweat on it? If you put salt on an open wound, it’s going to sting and hurt!

Likewise, when we apply our salt to the world, they are going to feel it, and it aint gonna feel good. This is why some will revile you like they did Jesus.

The gospel offends people, even if we tell others about Jesus in a gentle loving way. Not in a condemning way, but in a convicting way.

So if your salt has not lost its flavor, you’re going to sting a sinner with it. Pray that they will savor the Savior even if they at first find distaste of your saltiness.


Bookmark and Share
> posted by Jason McFadden at 0 Comments Links to this post

Christian Nonconformists



The same Greek word is used in both Romans 12:2 and 1 Peter 1:14 meaning to not be conformed.

Christians are to be Nonconformists. There are at least two angles on this:

1) Rom 12:2- Do not be conformed to the world, that is OUTWARD conformance.
2) 1 Pet 1:14- Do not be conformed to the evil passions or lusts you formerly had, that is INWARD conformance.

In other words, do not let yourself be affected by the influence of the world around you, outside of you, and do not let yourself be affected by your own inner old sinful nature that wars against you.

The enemy can come from within and without.

Regarding the enemy within, it's been said that we are our own worst enemy. James 1:14 speaks to that:

KJV James 1:14 But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed.

Our own inner lust leads us to sin.

While many Christians are good at masking their faults by outward appearances, inside they hide what ails them...a nagging propensity to sin. It's an internal war all Christians fight. (Galatians 5:17 , Romans 7)

Do not be conformed to your own former lusts, as Peter puts it. I like how Paul also puts it:

Romans 6:12  Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, that ye should obey it in the lusts thereof.

The world says, "Come, follow us..." Your inner voice says, "Come, follow myself..."

Jesus says, "Come, follow me." His sheep hear his voice and follow him. (Matthew 16:24, John 10:27)

God has predestined Christians to be Nonconformists to the world and to our sin, and to instead be conformed to the image of his son Jesus Christ. (Romans 8:29)

Christian- A conformist to Christ.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Jason McFadden at 1 Comments Links to this post

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Salt Shaking 102


Just a quick follow up with a succinct point made by Seth Weston.

In my previous post I was asking the question about how we can apply our "saltiness" to the world.

I argued the value of calling out sinners on their sin even though they cannot stop sinning inwardly but only conform outwardly. I mentioned that this outward call to stop sinning could be a catalyst God uses to change them inwardly.

Seth pointed out to me the greater value and important key to this: When we tell sinners to quit sinning outwardly, while that may be helpful, we shouldn't merely stop there. We should actually go all the way and call them to repent...like Jesus' opening statement in ministry.

In other words, by merely telling someone to quit cussing, for example, they will know that it offends you. That's at least a start...but don't stop there...tell the sinners about a Holy God and how their sin offends HIM!

(Thanks Seth. Hope I got that right.)
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Jason McFadden at 0 Comments Links to this post

Hope and Money


John MacArthur

Instruct those who are rich in this present world not to be conceited or to fix their hope on the uncertainty of riches, but on God, who richly supplies us with all things to enjoy. (1 Tim. 6:17)

A very real danger facing Christians is the temptation to fix their hope on the uncertainty of riches. To base their hope on the uncertainty of riches, instead of God, is foolish. Proverbs 11:28 warns that “he who trusts in his riches will fall.” Proverbs 23:4–5 adds, “Do not weary yourself to gain wealth, cease from your consideration of it. When you set your eyes on it, it is gone. For wealth certainly makes itself wings, like an eagle that flies toward the heavens.”

Rather than trusting in riches, believers are to fix their hope on God, who richly supplies us with all things to enjoy. God provides far more security than any earthly investment. Psalm 50:10–12 describes His incalculable wealth: “Every beast of the forest is Mine, the cattle on a thousand hills. I know every bird of the mountains, and everything that moves in the field is Mine. If I were hungry, I would not tell you; for the world is Mine, and all it contains.” God is not stingy; He richly supplies His children with all things to enjoy. Ecclesiastes 5:18–20 reads,

Here is what I have seen to be good and fitting: to eat, to drink and enjoy oneself in all one’s labor in which he toils under the sun during the few years of his life which God has given him; for this is his reward. Furthermore, as for every man to whom God has given riches and wealth, He has also empowered him to eat from them and to receive his reward and rejoice in his labor; this is the gift of God. For he will not often consider the years of his life, because God keeps him occupied with the gladness of his heart.

The highest form of joy for the believer is to bring glory to the Lord. True gladness, then, comes when believers give heed to Jesus’ words in Matthew 6:19–21:

Do not lay up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust destroy, and where thieves break in and steal. But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys, and where thieves do not break in or steal; for where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.

Later, in that same passage, Jesus gives the command three times not to be anxious (vv. 25, 31, 34). When we trust in God rather than riches, we have no reason to worry.

Today’s post adapted from John’s commentary on 1 Timothy (Moody, 1995).
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Charles Fry at 1 Comments Links to this post

Evening Meditation

By C.H. Spurgeon

"O that I knew where I might find Him!"—Job 23:3.

In Job's uttermost extremity he cried after the Lord. The longing desire of an afflicted child of God is once more to see his Father's face. His first prayer is not "O that I might be healed of the disease which now festers in every part of my body!" nor even "O that I might see my children restored from the jaws of the grave, and my property once more brought from the hand of the spoiler!" but the first and uppermost cry is, "O that I knew where I might find HIM, who is my God! that I might come even to His seat!" God's children run home when the storm comes on. It is the heaven-born instinct of a gracious soul to seek shelter from all ills beneath the wings of Jehovah. "He that hath made his refuge God," might serve as the title of a true believer. A hypocrite, when afflicted by God, resents the infliction, and, like a slave, would run from the Master who has scourged him; but not so the true heir of heaven, he kisses the hand which smote him, and seeks shelter from the rod in the bosom of the God who frowned upon him. Job's desire to commune with God was intensified by the failure of all other sources of consolation. The patriarch turned away from his sorry friends, and looked up to the celestial throne, just as a traveller turns from his empty skin bottle, and betakes himself with all speed to the well. He bids farewell to earth-born hopes, and cries, "O that I knew where I might find my God!" Nothing teaches us so much the preciousness of the Creator, as when we learn the emptiness of all besides. Turning away with bitter scorn from earth's hives, where we find no honey, but many sharp stings, we rejoice in Him whose faithful word is sweeter than honey or the honeycomb. In every trouble we should first seek to realize God's presence with us. Only let us enjoy His smile, and we can bear our daily cross with a willing heart for His dear sake.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Charles Fry at 0 Comments Links to this post

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Salt Shaking 101



Does it make sense to tell a sinner to not sin? Isn’t that impossible?

Isn’t a sinner’s nature to sin, just as a dog’s nature is to bark? I’ve yelled at my dog to stop barking many times and with little success.

What about telling a lost co-worker to stop “barking”? For example, should I bother telling a lost person to stop using vulgar obscenities and expletives? Are they able to stop this, at least around me?

I’m pretty sure they can control their tongue. Lost people do it all the time in the workplace when following the code of conduct.

Since it is possible for a sinner to not sin, at least outwardly and in certain situations, it seems that it would be ok to tell a sinner to not sin. In other words, it's pragmatic, or practical, it seems to work.

Besides a practical argument, a possible biblical (not to say the Bible isn't practical!) argument for doing this may be applicable as well. We are the salt of the earth.

So how do we apply our salt to the world to keep it from getting too rotten too fast? Could one way be by asking a co-worker to not use foul language? If they comply, won’t that to some degree decrease the amount of blatant and flagrant sin in the world?

In what other ways can Christians biblically apply their “salt” to the world?

Futhermore, don't we tell sinners to not sin if we tell a sinner to repent of their sin, to stop sinning and turn around and away from their sin...but then of course they can't repent unless God grants it?

A sinner is still a sinner even if they conform outwardly to your request to not commit a certain sin. But at least the notion that there is sin in the world, and that it must not be, is retained and promoted when we try to apply our salt in everyday situations. This may convict some lost people and be the catalyst through which God by his Holy Spirit draws them to true Godly biblical repentence!

So, salty saints, get shaking!
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Jason McFadden at 1 Comments Links to this post

Monday, November 17, 2008

Thoughts From the Institutes


I've been reading Calvin's Institutes of the Christian Religion, Volume 1 lately. Books are awesome! I finish one and move on to my next one...well this one's going to be a while! Volume 1 has over 800 pages in it...and then there's volume 2!

Anyway, over the next couple months (or however long it takes), I'm sure to share a thought from time to time. Here's today's thought found on page 65 of John T. McNeill's translation.

"For as rashness and superficiality are joined to ignorance and darkness, scarcely a single person has ever been found who did not fashion for himself an idol or specter in place of God. Surely, just as waters boil up from a vast, full spring, so does an immense crowd of gods flow forth from the human mind, while each one, in wandering about with too much license, wrongly invents this or that about God himself."

How are you doing with regard to creating your own idol in God's place? It sure doesn't take much time or imagination on our part to conjure up our own God, ready to dance to the tune of our wicked fiddle, does it? What's the cure? Scripture and the Holy Spirit...immerse ourselves in Scripture and KNOW OUR GOD WELL!

John 17:3 -And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.

If you know Him you are less likely to replace Him! Food for thought...
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Jim Leavenworth at 0 Comments Links to this post

The Power Of Blogging















Many people do not realize the power of blogs. In a recent interview
Rupert Murdoch said the following:

"It used to be that a handful of editors could decide what was news-and
what was not. They acted as sort of demigods. If they ran a story, it
became news. If they ignored an event, it never happened. Today editors are losing
this power. The Internet, for example, provides access to thousands of
new sources that cover things an editor might ignore. And if you aren't
satisfied with that, you can start up your own blog and cover and
comment on the news yourself. Journalists like to think of themselves as
watchdogs, but they haven't always responded well when the public calls
them to account."

To make his point, Murdoch criticized the media reaction after bloggers
debunked a "60 Minutes" report by former CBS anchor, Dan Rather, that President
Bush had evaded service during his days in the National Guard.

"Far from celebrating this citizen journalism, the establishment media
reacted defensively. During an appearance on Fox News, a CBS executive
attacked the bloggers in a statement that will go down in the annals of
arrogance. '60 Minutes,' he said, was a professional organization with
'multiple layers of checks and balances.' By contrast, he dismissed the
blogger as 'a guy sitting in his living room in his pajamas writing.'
But eventually it was the guys sitting in their pajamas who forced Mr.
Rather and his producer to resign.

You can read the entire article at this link:
blogging



People should not discount the power of a blog!
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Sunday, November 16, 2008

House of Yahweh Leader Convicted and a Mothers Response

Recently one of the leaders of the House of Yahweh, Yedidiyah Hawkins, was convicted of sexual assault of a child.

With the national attention that this cult has gotten, the mother of Christopher, aka Yedidiyah Hawkins, has responded in a letter to the Abilene Reporter News.
It was published in today's paper, Sunday, November 16,2008.

Here is the letter:

My son is Yedidiyah Hawkins, recently convicted of sexual assault. The purpose of my letter is not to plead forgiveness or to justify actions that my son has taken while involved with the House of Yahweh.

Christopher, aka Yedidiyah, was 8 when his father took him from our New York home to Texas. I had pleaded for his return but to no avail. Chris seemed to have found his place in Texas. I felt it would be in his best interest to stay with his father, not knowing what his future held.

I visited the House of Yahweh to attend Chris' wedding 16 years ago. It was peaceful. People seemed happy with their direction. There wasn't any reason to find the House of Yahweh evil. I heard from Christopher when he needed money. I was cut off from his life otherwise.

Chris worked for Hawkins but couldn't support his growing family. I knew of four grandchildren but didn't meet them until they were in state custody. More have appeared, and I have no idea how many there are.

I want the public realize how the House of Yahweh destroys families and how Hawkins uses these people to gain power of their minds and money, as with any cult.

Christopher is the first generation to have grown up there. Many children behind those walls today are just as susceptible. They will become the next generation of Christophers, waiting Hawkins' direction. Christopher is a victim, as are those that suffered by his hand. His actions were dictated to him. I do know my son will do everything he can to protect Hawkins until his dying day. He is lost to this sick religion as are others that follow it.

The House of Yahweh destroys family ties by alienating people from those that love them. They can only love their leader, and everything they do is for him. I pray that in the future, children are saved from this life and become productive people in the real world and act with a moral conscience that the majority of us can share.

Maria Menzer is the mother of Yedidiyah Hawkins and lives in New York.

Here is a link to the letter. ARN

The reason for this post is to remind us all of the error that is out there and the lives it is destroying or has destroyed. And speaking of lives destroyed, this Tuesday makes 30 years since the Jonestown tragedy.

As you start this new week remember the importance of standing against error and standing for truth.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Charles Fry at 0 Comments Links to this post

Saturday, November 15, 2008

The Abortion Of Scripture




















In 2003 there were 42 million abortions worldwide. The abortion of a baby results in it's death! This is a horrible thing and much could be written about it. However, today I want to talk about a different kind of abortion. The kind of abortion I am talking about occurs millions of times a day! In fact this kind of abortion usually occurs on Sundays between 10:00am and 12;00pm. I am speaking of the abortion of scripture! Today I recorded a message about this very important topic. Please take the time to listen and to provide feedback.

Here is the message:

Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Friday, November 14, 2008

23 Min in Hell...but not dead?

One of the bloggers informs me that Mr Wiese claims on his website (haven't seen the material) the verses I quoted to rebut his argument don't apply since he wasn't coming back from the dead. Folks...read the passage and tell me if this applies.

Luke 16:26-31 26 And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us, that would come from thence. 27 Then he said, I pray thee therefore, father, that thou wouldest send him to my father's house: 28 For I have five brethren; that he may testify unto them, lest they also come into this place of torment. 29 Abraham saith unto him, They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them. 30 And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent. 31 And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.

My first thought is that the author is stretching it quite a bit. First, if he was being totally honest he would at least mention the passage in his book and tell us why he doesn't believe it fits. One would think that by leaving it out he's making himself a little suspect, wouldn't you think? After all, the passage ruins his argument and could get in the way of solid book sales...I certainly hope this is not the case.

Regarding the Luke passage, here's what the author says:

"This was an out-of-body experience which comes under the classification of a vision. I didn’t die. This wasn’t a near-death experience. I don’t fit the scenario in Luke 16 as I didn’t come back from the dead. I’m not trying to persuade anyone with my testimony, but only to point them to the Word of God."

First, if you are out of your body then aren't you dead...at least temporarily? Isn't death the separation of the body from the spirit?

2nd- didn't the author say that there is NOTHING alive in hell? On page 12 of his book he says, "in hell there is no life of any kind. All is dead." Again on page 17 in the notes he repeats, "And there is no life in hell." If he wasn't dead then how was he in hell where there is no life? I'm confused.

Folks, this is grasping for straws. Sheol is grave in Hebrew, right? This is the place for the departed "Dead" Hades (Greek) and Sheol (Hebrew) are the same...here is what Strong's says for the meaning of Hades: the nether world, the realm of the dead 3) later use of this word: the grave, death, hell

Here is what Strong's says about Sheol: "underworld, grave, hell, pit 1a) the underworld 1b) Sheol - the OT designation for the abode of the dead 1b1) place of no return"

So...Mr Wiese went to the realm of the dead, grave, death, abode of the dead...where, as he states, "There is no life of any kind"...but conveniently, he wasn't dead and never came back from the dead...even though he says on page 45, "I was startled to see my body lying on the living room floor."

Folks...unfortunately I believe he's playing games with words. You can't have your cake and eat it too! The whole point of the story is that a miraculous visit from beyond the grave (a miracle!) is not sufficient to bring a sinner to salvation. Mr Wiese can split hairs and redefine things all he wants...the point is that the Luke passage refutes his whole idea. If he was "out of body" and visited hell then this passage refutes that very idea. Saying "I wasn't dead" (I guess to mean he didn't have a heart attack or get shot, etc) doesn't matter one bit...he was sent to hell supposedly just as if he'd died...he left his body on the floor and went to a place for the dead where he says there is NO LIFE.

Luke 16 still stands and God's Word is still enough...more than enough, it is totally sufficient and necessary to bring about redemption/regeneration. Fantastical experiences won't do it...if they won't hear "Moses and the Prophets" they won't believe!
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Jim Leavenworth at 3 Comments Links to this post

Thursday, November 13, 2008

23 Minutes in Hell...or 120 Minutes in Hell Reading It!





OK...here is the promised review of Bill Wiese's book, 23 Minutes in Hell- several bloggers were asking for a review and I've finished the book and watched one of Mr. Wiese's presentations as well. In the review below I will put page numbers that correspond to where I found the info in his book.

For those of you who aren't familiar with the book. Mr. Wiese's claim is that the Lord sent him to hell for 23 minutes with the following purposes:

  • "The reason I was shown this place was to bring back a message of warning" (p. xiv)

  • The Lord Jesus supposedly told him he was sent there, "Because many people do not believe that hell truly exists." (p. 33)

  • Lastly he says, "I believe the only reason God took me to hell was to draw attention to His Word on this subject...He is imploring people to listen to His Word." (p. 98)

So here is a summary for why this book is on the shelves, "God is imploring us to listen to His Word and is warning us about hell since many don't believe in its existence." The author claims that he's added nothing to Scripture and that everything he experienced is backed up 100% by the Word of God.

OK. So here's my first issue. If this adds nothing to God's Word, why do we need this revelation to convince us about the reality of hell? Is God's Word not enough to do that? I believe it is...but I'll get to my real refutation toward the end regarding that matter.

First let me say that there are many things in the book that are true...the author rightly says that many today don't believe in God and eternal judgment. For example, "Our culture has become desensitized and conditioned to accept various forms of demonic creatures, caricatures of Satan, and glimpses of hell as simply 'entertainment.'" (p. ix). Very, very true, I couldn't agree more. In addition, I watched one of the author's video presentations on the Web (you can listen and watch at the following link, http://www.ccc.org.au/default.asp?page=MCcurrentservice). The author seems sincere and he seems to believe what he's saying.

Here is my purpose for writing. I am also warning people about something...and it's the dangers of this book and what the author is doing. I am not questioning his sincerity and I am not belittling the dangers of eternal punishment at all. I believe in a literal hell and the lake of fire, I believe that God will pour out His wrath on all unbelievers, the devil and his angels...I believe eternal punishment is forever (duh!) and that it is literal flaming torment. Here's what I don't believe; I DON'T BELIEVE MR. WIESE'S "VISION" WAS FROM THE LORD!

Now I know that I'm goint to be attacked as not being open, limiting God, etc etc, yada, yada. Hear me out. The author rightly makes the following claim that I wholeheartedly agree to: "It is not my experience that is important for you to believe, but what the Word of God has to say about the matter." Yes, but when I'm through I wonder if this statement will still hold true for the author? What if it can be shown Scripturally that the entire premise the book is written upon is a flawed and unscriptural foundation? Would the author admit that he received a vision from someone other than the Lord? Is it possible that this revelation is Satanic? Consider the following:

  • Matthew 24:24- "For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect."
  • Ephesians 4:14- "That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive;"
  • 2 Corinthians 11:13-14- "For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. 14 And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light."
My point is simple, just because we see or hear of a vision doesn't mean it's from the Lord...just because someone says "I'm Jesus" doesn't mean it's true...even if they appear as an angel of light. Aren't we supposed to try (test) the spirits to see if they're of God?

  • 1 John 4:1- "Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world."
Those who read the book or watch the presentation may say, "But he reads very many passages of Scripture! How can it be wrong?!" This brings me to my first point of contention:

#1- Death by Cross-Reference: To put it mildly, the book and presentations drown you with quoted Scripture verses...given in rapid machine-gun succession. To the casual (or lazy) it may be convincing. This abundance of Bible verses seems to give it credibility. My beef is that many of the supposed support verses are out of context and that there is very little actual contextual exegesis (explanations in context) to support the assertions. Since this is not my main focus for this article I'll only quote a few examples:

Example 1: (p. 95) "Now the Lord gave visions to these great men [he's speaking of the prophets and Apostles], and, although my experience is not in any way to be compared to them, the Bible says that 'God shows no partiality' (Acts 10:34)" Now let me ask you a question...is Acts 10:34 dealing with God's impartiality in choosing prophets? NO! It's about Peter's revelation that God is not partial to just the Jews...but also to the Gentiles with respect to His redemptive plan. This is horrible eisegesis (reading your meaning into the text).

Example 2: How about Job 31:3 &12 which he uses to support the idea of eternal destruction? Verse 3 says, "Is it not destruction for the wicked, and disaster for the workers of iniquity?" ; Verse 12 says "For that would be a fire that consumes to destruction" This passage is not talking about eternal flaming torment, it's talking about the destructive dangers of adultery, etc.

Many other verses are suspect...even the author admits this several times.

#2- Demons torture people in hell: The author goes to great length depicting demons sadistically ruling over hell and torturing people. Here's the discussion on pages 130-132. First the author acknowledges that demons will be tormented in the lake of fire (Rev 20:10)...then he says "However, I believe Scripture indicates that currently in hell (Sheol or Hades), God does allow the demons to torment lost souls ...this may not be absolutely conclusive in Scripture, and some theologians may disagree; however, I believe there are enough verses to consider this torment to be more than conjecture. What Scripture says is all that matters, not what I have to say. I am simply reporting the events." (p. 130-131) BUT HE SAYS HE WAS THERE and he says that the demons were torturing him and others. Scripture doesn't teach this theme...and the supporting verses don't either!

#3- Denial of the Sufficiency of Scriptural Revelation: Flat out- the author, intentionally or not, denies the sufficiency of scriptural revelation. On page 83 he says "truth if found in the pages of the Bible. But there are many who do not want to recognize God's Word as truth because of the light it sheds on our sin." On page 34 Jesus Christ supposedly tells him "Go and tell them about this place. It is not my desire that any should go there." Well according to this book God's Word and God's Spirit are not sufficient...we need someone to come back from the dead, from hell itself, to validate the truths of Scripture. The idea is that they won't believe unless there's proof.

There are many other issues I have that time will not permit a thorough discussion- for example, his views that God's presence is not in hell (isn't God omnipresent and isn't he the focus of the outpouring of wrath and torment?...not demons!), the hugely Arminian, man-centered focus on God and man (God is basically begging people to be saved and He can't accomplish His will to save them...unless they are talked into believing Hell is real), huge charismatic overtones (I felt, I sensed, my experience, etc, etc).

If you've rejected all I've said, please pay attention to my main rebuttal of the entire book. One particular passage came to mind when I heard of the book. What's sad is that the passage I'm going to mention is never mentioned in the entire book...although verse around it are "cherry-picked" with great precision...and apparent understanding. Read this passage very clearly and do it a couple times:

Luke 16:23-31- "And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. 24 And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame. 25 But Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented. 26 And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us, that would come from thence. 27 Then he said, I pray thee therefore, father, that thou wouldest send him to my father's house: 28 For I have five brethren; that he may testify unto them, lest they also come into this place of torment. 29 Abraham saith unto him, They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them. 30 And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent. 31 And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."

The author loves to quote verses 23-24 to support his experience...isn't it curious that he omits and never, ever references verses 26-31? I can't help from believing this is intentional and the reason is obvious; the author's whole experience is not biblical and the verses almost speak specifically against the notion!

Why would God tell him to warn us of the reality of eternal torment by sending someone back from the pit of hell to try and persuade us when the Lord Jesus in Scripture vehemently denied the notion and instead, affirmed the sufficiency of the SCRIPTURES ALONE?!

If you are a believer you have "Moses and the Prophets"- you have the Word of God to warn people of the dangers of eternal judgment if they don't repent of their sins and helplessly turn in faith to the God-ordained Redeemer, the Lord Jesus Christ. You need nothing else...the Scriptures, opened by the Holy Spirit, are the tools with which a blind and dead sinner are brought to life, not in a personal testimony of experience. If you want your loved ones, friends, coworkers to repent and believe then preach the Word of God to them!

This is not "23 minutes in hell", it's 23 minutes in heresy. This is dangerous folks! If you watch his presentation you realize how dangerous it can be. Here is the formula:

Emotion/Fear...overwhelming death by cross references...plus watching a horror film clip (shown at the churches) and then shallow, man-centered, ABC-repeat-after-me psychologically tainted and decisional regeneration-type techniques equals what? Many decisions by man and very few salvations by the Lord. Disagree all you want, but when did the Lord Jesus Christ ever do this? When a presentation's main thesis is totally unbiblical should be just say "but people are making decisions" comfort us and make us think it's OK. A presentation based on a lie is nothing but a lie. If anyone gets saved at these meetings you can be assured it's not because Bill Wiese came back to us from hell...it's because someone heard Scripture and the Lord used it despite what man attempted to do.

Think folks, be careful, we need to be accurate and truthful (BIBLICAL!) in our presentations.






Bookmark and Share
> posted by Jim Leavenworth at 11 Comments Links to this post

Somalis grow fearful of Islamists

The following is from the BBC:

Somalis grow fearful of Islamists



Public anger at the recent stoning of a 13-year-old girl in Somalia shows the growing resentment towards radical Islamists who have gained control of much of the south and centre of the country.

Insurgents from the militant group al-Shabab are seen as authoritarian and unaccountable - unlike the Islamists who were in control of the capital, Mogadishu, in 2006.

Asha Ibrahim Dhuhulow was stoned to death for adultery in the southern port city of Kismayo, which was taken control by al-Shabab and its allies in August.


I don't know what crime she committed other than being raped - and I was not even allowed to see her body
Asha Ibrahim Dhuhulow's aunt

Her 62-year-old aunt told the BBC that the teenager had in fact been raped by three armed men - and she took Asha to the police station to report it.

Several days later, after two suspects had been arrested, she was asked to return to the station with her niece.

To her surprise the girl was taken into custody too.

"I tried to speak to the police but they said they were not talking," she said.

Three days later, after Asha had been tried in an Islamist court, she was stoned to death.

"They said that the girl had chatted up these men and had confessed to adultery," she said.

But the aunt said the authorities clearly failed to notice her age, how mentally disturbed she was by her experience, or her history of mental illness.

"She was only 13 years old. I have got her card from Hagarder refugee camp which has her age on it. She might have looked a bit older, but you could tell her age by talking to her," she said.

Law and order

Other critics point to the lack of lawyers, witnesses or appeal process.

The Islamists were reported to have announced their verdict the day before the stoning from cars with loudspeakers.

But Asha's aunt was not informed of the court's decision - despite repeated visits to the police station.


"I was not even told that she was to be killed, I just heard it from people after it happened.
"I don't know what crime she committed other than being raped; and I was not even allowed to see her body," she said.

Al-Shabab in Kismayo has refused attempts by the BBC to discuss the stoning.

It is almost two years since the Ethiopian-backed interim government ousted the Union of Islamic Courts (UIC), which had ruled much of Somalia for nearly six months.

In 2006, the UIC was generally welcomed for the law and order it brought to a country bedevilled by more than a decade of civil war and clan fighting.

UIC fighters launched an insurgency following what many Somalis regarded as an Ethiopian invasion. Its youth and military wing, al-Shabab, gained notoriety for its determination, despite its much smaller numbers.

Fear

The group, which is on the US terror list and is said to have links with al-Qaeda, has since split from the UIC, angered by its current peace negotiations with the government.

It does not work against the UIC, but it favours co-operating with other groups including:

• The Kaanboni, led by Hassan Turki, who is also on the US terror list

• The Islamic Front, a new group about which very little is known.

For example, since mid-August, when they captured the Lower Jubba, Middle Jubba and Gedo regions from local clan militia, they now share the administration with existing officials.


According to well-informed sources in the regions who requested anonymity, these groups instil fear among the local population.
"You keep quiet and follow the commands of the Islamists, or emigrate to neighbouring countries, or simply die and leave this world," one of them said.

In Mogadishu, al-Shabab insurgents are said to move around the city freely - often in vehicles captured from the government.

The government forces and troops from Ethiopia and the African Union are limited to the airport, port, presidential palace and a few military camps.

Besides the central city of Baidoa, these are the only areas government forces now hold.

When they attempt to move between these points, they are often ambushed by the Islamists.

A few weeks ago, al-Shabab held a military parade in a former military camp in the capital, where they carried out a public flogging of two men sentenced by an Islamic court over a family dispute.

The flogging took place in front of crowds of local residents, and was orchestrated to show just who is running the show.

Death threats

Al-Shabab insurgents have a countrywide organisation, threatening anyone they perceive to be supporting the government with text messages.

They are wrong if they committed a kidnap. They will have to be punished under Sharia law
Hiiran's al-Shabab Chairman Sheikh Ali Dheere

One human rights activist outside the capital told the BBC that he was ordered to close down his offices.

He said he began receiving quite frequent threatening messages on his mobile. So he stopped using his phone.

Eventually a relative brought him a stern message from al-Shabab. It said if he did not stop his work, he would be killed.

As the government has lost ground over the last five months, the number of attacks on civil society activists, local non-governmental workers and international aid workers has increased.

Some have been shot dead point-blank; others have been kidnapped and are still missing.

Most suspect that those behind the attacks are al-Shabab insurgents, even if no-one dares say so publicly.

In the central Hiiran region, where most towns have seen a presence of al-Shabab and the more moderate UIC since July, people have been more vocal in their complaints.

'Not Islamic'

A former army engineer and political activist detailed examples of those targeted because of their association with Ethiopia or the West.

"They have killed 17 civilians without reason or due process including two teachers and a well-known traditional elder, Da'ar Hirsi Hooshow," the man, whose name is being withheld for his own safety, told the BBC.

The teachers worked at a school that taught English and employed foreign staff.

The shooting of Mr Hooshow, who was known to be holding talks with Ethiopian troops before he was shot dead on 10 October, prompted angry scenes in Beled Weyne.

Town residents stoned al-Shabab centres believing them to be behind the killing.

And while the UIC may share al-Shabab's aim to see the Ethiopians leave the country, it has distanced itself from its former allies.

On Monday, UIC authorities in Beled Weyne arrested nine al-Shabab members for allegedly kidnapping an official over the weekend

"We didn't ask them to do any operation at all," Hiiran's al-Shabab Chairman Sheikh Ali Dheere told the BBC.

"They are wrong if they committed a kidnap. They will have to be punished under Sharia law," he said.

But many fear that law and order is not al-Shabab's priority.

"They are holding this region with the barrel of the gun, and it has nothing to do with Islam," the Hiiran political activist said.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

The Great Causer

Some argue the existence of God based on the law of cause and effect.

Creation is an effect. Who or what caused it is a great debate. Christians believe God caused it.

(I also believe God caused creation whether I believe he did or not. It's absolutely true. Absolute truth does not require my agreement to it, or my belief in it, in order for it to be true. Truth is absolute. It is, just as God is, whether I am or not.)

Christians also believe God is the first cause. God is not an effect. Nobody and nothing caused God. God is infinite and eternal. He has always been.

Non-Christians may aruge the law of cause and effect is broken by God having no cause. That's another debate.

Christian, God has not only caused creation to be, he has caused you to be. God caused physical creation. God caused your physcial being.

God also caused your spiritual being, and that is why he is The Great Causer. Our justification, our salvation, our spiritual life in Christ, is the effect. We are his, God's workmanship, created in Christ Jesus (Ephesians 2:10).

1 Peter 1:3 (ESV) - Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ! According to his great mercy, he has caused us to be born again..."

God's mercy is great. God's cause is great. God is great, and greatly to be praised!
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Jason McFadden at 0 Comments Links to this post

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Gay rights protesters disrupt Sunday service

The following was found at this link: LSJ.com






Gay rights protesters disrupt Sunday service

People threw fliers, shouted slogans at Delta Township church

Kathleen Lavey
klavey@lsj.com

DELTA TWP. - A radical gay rights group is claiming responsibility for a protest Sunday at Mount Hope Church in Delta Township.

Protesters who entered the Creyts Road church along with worshippers surprised the congregation when they stood up during the service, threw fliers at churchgoers and shouted slogans such as "It's OK to be gay," and "Jesus was a homo," according to David Williams, communications director at the church. His father, Dave Williams, is the church's longtime pastor. He was not preaching at the church Sunday.

Another group of protesters demonstrated outside the church at the same time as the indoor protest.

The Eaton County Sheriff's Department responded to the scene Sunday but no arrests were made.

In a released statement, David Williams said churchgoers were unclear as to the purpose of the demonstration.

A Lansing group affiliated with a radical gay organization known as Bash Back, formed to protest the Republican and Democratic national conventions earlier this year, put out a call on the Internet on Oct. 7 for activists to come to a "radical queer convergence" in Lansing on Nov. 7-9.

A posting on its MySpace page declared the convergence a "fierce success."

Fire alarm pulled

According to a report on the Bash Back group's news site, protesters inside the church pulled a fire alarm, unfurled a banner from the church balcony, shouted and threw fliers to the worshippers.

Outside the church, protesters carried picket signs and an upside-down, pink cross.

The conservative RightMichigan Web site posted an account of the incident Monday, and a number of conservative bloggers had picked up on the item by Tuesday.

Williams said the church had received 80 to 85 e-mails and phone calls by Tuesday, "from churches and individuals around the country to express their concern and general disgust for what happened on Sunday."

Nick De Leeuw of RightMichigan said he got his account of the incident from a church member who was there.

However, he said, the photo along with his report - of protesters dressed in black with their faces covered by pink, Middle-Eastern style headcoverings - was not from the protest at the church but from an earlier Bash Back protest elsewhere.

No arrests made

Mount Hope Church, affiliated with the Assemblies of God denomination, teaches followers that homosexuality is a sin.

However, "Mount Hope Church strives to follow Jesus' example of loving the sinner but not the sin," Williams said.

The Eaton County Sheriff's Department got a call regarding the protest at about noon Sunday, said Lt. Jeff Warder.

Warder said protesters outside the church left peacefully when someone from the team of pastors came outside and told them they were not welcome on church property.

Warder said deputies did not handle the protest inside the building.

No arrests were made.

In New York City on Tuesday, the conservative Catholic League said it would ask Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox to investigate the protest.

Typically, the sheriff's investigation would be turned over to the county prosecutor if the sheriff felt charges were warranted, said Matt Frendewey, spokesman for the attorney general's office. He said it would be rare for the attorney general's office to get involved in such a case.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 1 Comments Links to this post

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

This Morning's Meditation


“The trial of your faith.”

by C.H. Spurgeon


1 Peter 1:7
Faith untried may be true faith, but it is sure to be little faith, and it is likely to remain dwarfish so long as it is without trials. Faith never prospers so well as when all things are against her: tempests are her trainers, and lightnings are her illuminators. When a calm reigns on the sea, spread the sails as you will, the ship moves not to its harbor; for on a slumbering ocean the keel sleeps too. Let the winds rush howling forth, and let the waters lift up themselves, then, though the vessel may rock, and her deck may be washed with waves, and her mast may creak under the pressure of the full and swelling sail, it is then that she makes headway towards her desired haven. No flowers wear so lovely a blue as those which grow at the foot of the frozen glacier; no stars gleam so brightly as those which glisten in the polar sky; no water tastes so sweet as that which springs amid the desert sand; and no faith is so precious as that which lives and triumphs in adversity. Tried faith brings experience. You could not have believed your own weakness had you not been compelled to pass through the rivers; and you would never have known God’s strength had you not been supported amid the water-floods. Faith increases in solidity, assurance, and intensity, the more it is exercised with tribulation. Faith is precious, and its trial is precious too.

Let not this, however, discourage those who are young in faith. You will have trials enough without seeking them: the full portion will be measured out to you in due season. Meanwhile, if you cannot yet claim the result of long experience, thank God for what grace you have; praise him for that degree of holy confidence whereunto you have attained: walk according to that rule, and you shall yet have more and more of the blessing of God, till your faith shall remove mountains and conquer impossibilities.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Charles Fry at 0 Comments Links to this post

23 Minutes in Hell?























Wow...here we go again! Years ago it was "Embraced by the Light" by Betty J. Eadie (Mormon) and now we find some new rivals. During my visit today to Hastings I found two books that seem to be cut from the same idea...the one is called "90 minutes in Heaven."

Here is what CBD website has to say about this one:
"After a devastating car accident, Baptist minister Don Piper is pronounced dead at the scene. During the next 90 minutes, he remembers hearing beautiful music, meeting those who had a spiritual impact in his life, and experiences deep peace--until suddenly he is brought back to "real life" through another minister's prayer in this amazing true story."

The other book, which was my intended purchase, was"23 Minutes in Hell"written by Bill Wiese. Here is what CBD says about the book:

What does an eternity in torment look like, and how can it be avoided? God allowed Wiese to spend time in the devil's lair, and now he shares what he saw, heard, and felt. Along with hundreds of Scriptures referencing hell's horrors, Wiese shares his insights to commonly asked questions such as "Is hell a literal burning place?", "Where is hell?", "Do you have a body in hell?" and "Can 'good' people go to hell?"

OK...here's my big "beef" with both of them before even reading the two..."WHAT IS WRONG OR INCOMPLETE IN GOD'S OWN REVELATION OF WHAT HEAVEN AND HELL ARE ALL ABOUT?!!! Apparently God must think that we need extra-biblical revelation to straighten out our perceptions of eternity and the life beyond. Apparently the Bible isn't good enough?

Here's what you can expect from our blog...a full review in the next day or so as work schedule permits. I'm about 1/3 of the way through "23 Minutes in Hell." At this point I'd like to retitle it "60 minutes in Hell reading 23 Minutes in Hell"...argh! This book belongs on the same shelf as "The Shack"...the shelf relegated to the heretical collection. See our post on that one at this link:
http://preachtoday.blogspot.com/2008/08/shack.html">
The Shack




Do I doubt that Mr. Wiese had some sort of experience? No...not my position to do that. What I do not believe is that Mr. Wiese went to hell and I don't believe the Lord is using him as he seems to think. Expect my response to all those who have been asking us to review this one in the next day or so.

For now...read your Bible...it's revelation is complete and all we need!
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Jim Leavenworth at 4 Comments Links to this post

Is Church Whacked ?



This is a picture from a church in Abilene, Texas.
I thought it might add to the discussion of "Threats Facing The Church" that was posted earlier this morning.

Notice the ipod give away?
What do you think is the focus of this church?
Is it whacked?
Are you drawing people with the preaching of God's Word or the give away?

Post your thoughts, I would like to hear them.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Charles Fry at 10 Comments Links to this post

Threats Facing The Church




I was reading the January 2008 Issue of, Foundation. The main article in that issue was entitled, The Threats We Face. The article challenges Christians to consider the threats that are facing churches all over the world. Before I share the threats the article suggested, I want to offer the reader an opportunity to share their thoughts. What do you feel are the biggest threats facing the church today. Offer proof for the threat you suggested and also suggest how you think churches should deal with the threat. I think this could be an interesting discussion. So think about It and start posting your comments. To the other bloggers who visit the Preaching Today blog, see if you can discuss the same topic on your blog. You reach people who will never visit my blog and they may have a perspective and knowledge about things that my readers do not have.

Let the discussion begin!
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 8 Comments Links to this post

Monday, November 10, 2008

Conservative Christian Music

Any time I post an article about music I know there is always the chance someone will have a problem with what I write. I find it funny that some Christians are more concerned about a style of music then they are about biblical doctrine and correct theology. Many will sit in a church where they are not hearing true biblical preaching because they like the style of music!

Another thing that has always confused me is the people who will only listen to what they call conservative christian music. There are usually the same people who rarely listen to music and never buy music. They speak loudly about how all kinds of musical styles are wicked and ungodly but yet they may have only one or two CDs of the, "right kind of music." In most cases these people are not really music fans so to condemn all kinds of music is no big deal to them because they don't listen to anything!

If you challenge them to point you to some conservative music that you could buy they usually have no clue. Basically there point of view goes like this, most music is evil but I don't really care about finding any music that is Godly and good!

Some people do not like my musical taste however, what they probably don't know is that I listen to more conservative Christian music in a week then they do in a year! I buy it, I search for it, and I look for web-sites that sell it and promote it. So tonight I am going to provide people links to some of the best sites to find conservative Christan music.

If you prefer music that is more conservative you should actually support it and buy some!


So here are some great web-sites:


Baptist Ink

Here are some CDs to look for at this site:

Sun of My Soul
Two classical guitarists, Brian Pinner and David Chapman, present this enjoyable collection of sacred songs for guitar.

Features

Sun of My Soul
Come, Thou Fount of Every Blessing
Fairest Lord Jesus
The Church's One Foundation
Be Thou My Vision
Were You There?
Glorious Things of Thee Are Spoken
Sing Praise to God Who Reigns Above
Beneath the Cross of Jesus
Let All Mortal Flesh Keep Silence
Breate on Me, Breath of God
All Creatures of Our God and King
O Worship the King


Jesus Is All
Violin music by Anna Rossi.
Features

* There Is Power In The Blood
* Jesus Is All (Medley)
* What A Friend We Have In Jesus
* The Story of Jesus Melody
* And Can It Be?
* In The Garden
* Washed In The Blood
* As The Deer
* Great Is Thy Faithfulness
* Messiah, Come (Medley)


Abigail Miller

Abigail Miller's music is a blend of peaceful original songs and old-fashioned hymns, accompanied by an array of beautiful instruments, such as the harp, cello, violin, viola, guitar, piano, and flute.


Akting Music


SacredAudio.com


Here are some CD's to look for at this site:

A Quiet Heart
Songs of devotion and reflection will help quiet your heart before the Lord.


New Every Morning


Old Fashioned Christian Radio Music Store
There is currently 433 CD's for sale at this site!


BJU PRESS

There is a lot of great music at this site: Here is just a few suggestions.

With Grateful Praise
In this string quartet recording featuring Ryan and Bevan Elliott and Joanna Lebo and Sharon Gerber, you
will enjoy beautiful arrangements of both meditative and spirited pieces to fill your heart with praise to the Lord.


King of Love
King of Love features songs for trusting and treasuring Jesus Christ. The text of each selection performed by the BJU Singers and Orchestra magnifies the excellent character and compassion of Christ, and each song allows a rejoicing believer to savor the sweetness of fellowship with Jesus.

Warren Cook and Dan Forrest have collaborated to create a recording that includes
favorite texts and tunes as magnificent as "Fairest Lord Jesus" and "Jesus, Thy Blood and Righteousness," and as personally tender as "Be Thou My Vision" and "Give Me Jesus."King of Love exalts the glory of Christ’s name and gives to Him glorious praise!


I will stop for now. I may add other sites and recommendations later.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 1 Comments Links to this post

This Evening's Meditation


C. H. Spurgeon

"It is enough for the disciple that he be as His Master."—Matthew 10:25.


No one will dispute this statement, for it would be unseemly for the servant to be exalted above his Master. When our Lord was on earth, what was the treatment He received? Were His claims acknowledged, His instructions followed, His perfections worshipped, by those whom He came to bless? No; "He was despised and rejected of men." Outside the camp was His place: cross-bearing was His occupation. Did the world yield Him solace and rest? "Foxes have holes, and the birds of the air have nests; but the Son of man hath not where to lay His head." This inhospitable country afforded Him no shelter: it cast Him out and crucified Him. Such—if you are a follower of Jesus, and maintain a consistent, Christ-like walk and conversation—you must expect to be the lot of that part of your spiritual life which, in its outward development, comes under the observation of men. They will treat it as they treated the Saviour—they will despise it. Dream not that worldlings will admire you, or that the more holy and the more Christ-like you are, the more peaceably people will act towards you. They prized not the polished gem, how should they value the jewel in the rough? "If they have called the Master of the house Beelzebub, how much more shall they call them of His household?" If we were more like Christ, we should be more hated by His enemies. It were a sad dishonour to a child of God to be the world's favourite. It is a very ill omen to hear a wicked world clap its hands and shout "Well done" to the Christian man. He may begin to look to his character, and wonder whether he has not been doing wrong, when the unrighteous give him their approbation. Let us be true to our Master, and have no friendship with a blind and base world which scorns and rejects Him. Far be it from us to seek a crown of honour where our Lord found a coronet of thorn.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Charles Fry at 0 Comments Links to this post

Running the Race


John MacArthur


When I was in college, I was a member of our school's track and field team. I performed best in the sprints, and occasionally the quarter mile. One of my favorite races was the mile relay. Of all the races we ran, the one I remember best is one we didn't win.

The race started wonderfully--our first runner ran such a great opening quarter-mile leg that as he passed the baton to me, we were tied for the lead. I ran as hard as I could, and as I passed the baton to our third runner, we were in first place. I thought we had an excellent chance to win--our fourth runner was especially fast.

Our third runner took off like lightening around the first curve and down the back stretch. And then the unthinkable happened. He stopped suddenly, walked off the track, and sat down on the grass. I ran over to him, thinking he must have pulled a muscle. When I reached him, he didn't look like he was in pain, so I asked what was wrong. I'll never forget his reply. All he said was, "I don't know--I just didn't feel like running today."

Sadly, many people are like that runner. Somewhere along the way they stopped pursuing a deep, loving relationship with Christ, walked off His path of righteousness, and sat down to rest in their own self-righteousness and the ease of worldly pleasures. But allegiance and love to Christ demand a lifelong commitment. As our Lord Himself said, "No one, after putting his hand to the plow and looking back, is fit for the kingdom of God" (Luke 9:62).

The apostle Paul understood that priority. His relationship to Christ was the passion of his life: "that I may know Him, and the power of His resurrection and the fellowship of His sufferings, being conformed to His death; in order that I may attain to the resurrection from among the dead" (Phil. 3:10-11). But he was under no illusion that he had achieved anything, and he compared his own pursuit of Christ to that of a runner in a race (vv. 12-16). Your spiritual race must have that same sense of dissatisfaction--without it there's no reason to even run. In fact, there are several principles you need to apply as you pursue Him.

Read those principles here.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Charles Fry at 0 Comments Links to this post

Sunday, November 9, 2008

Hymns of Worship

It is Sunday night and we face a new week. Here is the perfect music to end your Sunday with:













Hymns of Worship
Label: Mulfinger Music
Genre: Sacred – Instrumental
Year of release: 1998
Performers: The Mulfinger Family
Description: This instrumental recording features hymns that believers sing both in Europe and America, played by strings and flute.





You can download the album right now at SacredAudio.com. Here is the link to the album:
Hymns



Here is information about SacredAudio.com.

Today's world is full of sounds and messages that can draw the
Christian away from a focus on Christ and His Word. SacredAudio.com
seeks to counter those sounds and messages by providing music that
encourages the Christian in his personal walk for the Lord, builds his
character, and strengthens him for service. It is our desire to have
the largest and best selection of conservative Christian music
available on the web for download--and to represent the finest
conservative Christian music labels and independent producers.


You can also buy Gift Certificates for a friend.


So download this album now and go to bed with the beautiful instrumental sounds of, Hymns of Worship.


Have a great week.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Is our Church Attendance Helping or Hurting?

Sunday after Sunday millions of people attend church, but are they leaving better off or worse off?


Today I preached a sermon about this issue. The text was 1 Corinthians 11:17-22. You can listen to the sermon here:


Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Saturday, November 8, 2008

Human Freedom: The Debate Rages





I've recently finished two books...the first was "The Case for Faith" by Lee Strobel...the second was "Chosen by God" by Dr. R. C. Sproul. While they were both written with a different focus and purpose in mind, one thing struck me was the issue of man's freedom versus God's sovereignty.

Is man free...is God sovereign...can the two be reconciled. I've heard some say that when they find passages that emphasize man's freedom they preach it...and when they come to passages that emphasize God's sovereignty they preach it. This is somewhat true but I really believe it's a theological copout. For the same reason we cannot view the love of God without considering the justice of God (and all His attributes for that matter!), likewise we cannot look at man's freedom apart from God's sovereignty.

I enjoyed and learned from both books. The biggest issue I have with "The Case for Faith" was the chapter that explains the doctrine of hell. In this chapter Strobel interviews J. P. Moreland, professor at the Talbot School of Theology, on his views on the doctrine of hell. This is a horrible chapter to say the least! First of all Dr. Moreland denies the literal flames of hell...he says they are figurative (p. 176). What really struck me were his thoughts on hell with regard to human freedom. His ultra-high view of human freedom is seen in the following quotes:

"If you were to force people to do something [go to heaven] against their free choice, you would be dehumanizing them...if God has given people free will...then there's no guarantee that everybody's going to choose to cooperate with him. The option of forcing everyone to go to heaven is immoral, because it's dehumanizing; it strips them of the dignity of making their own decision." (p. 182-183). He goes on to say "When God allows people to say 'no' to him, he actually respects and dignifies them" p. 183. He says, "I think people in heaven will realize that hell is a way of honoring people as intrinsically valuable creatures made in God's image" (p. 186). The statement that totally amazed me was this one found on p. 192..."Remember that hell will forever be a monument to human dignity and the value of human choice." WHAT?!

Human freedom is seen on such a high platitude that it almost transcends God's holiness and the sinfulness (complete) of man. Hell is NOT a monument to human dignity and the value of human choice...on the contrary, it is a monument to the completely depraved nature of man and the holiness and justice of God. Man is lost, undone and incable of being saved...he is doomed! God is holy, God is just and God rightly sends people to hell not as a monument to their dignity and their free choice but to His holiness and justice. The Bible is NOT about us...it's about God! Isn't it sad when even the existence of hell is paraded as being man-centered and man-honoring versus being God-centered and God-honoring?

Chosen by God did a much better job! On page 27 Dr Sproul says the following: "Without sovereignty God cannot be God. If we reject divine sovereignty then we must embrace atheism...we must hold tightly to God's sovereignty. Yet we must do it in such a way so as not to violate human freedom." At first glance it would appear Dr Sproul agrees with J. P. Moreland. Not quite. What does it mean for a Calvinist to say he believes in the freedom of the human will? He then says, "The non-Reformed thinker usually responds by saying that for God to impose his power on unwilling people is to violate man's feedom" (p. 35). Dr Sproul denies that humans have autonomy (to be a law unto oneself, answerable to noone). To sum up the Bible's position on the human will is fairly simple...man is morally and spiritually bankrupt...his desires, will, emotions, his entire being is affected totally by the fall into sin and he is thus incapable of choosing Christ without God's sovereign work of regeneation. Doesn't Scripture teach this? See Genesis 6:5, 8:21; Isa 64:6; Jer 13:23, 17:9; Ecc 9:3; Psa 51:5, 58:3; John 8:31-34; 1 Cor 2:14; 2 Cor 4:4, 5:14-15, Rom 1:18-25; Eph 2:1-2, 4-5, etc, etc.

Here is a summary. Man was once morally free but the whole race fell completely into sin with the result that the entire human being is affected and controlled/enslaved to sin (mind, will, body, etc). Unsaved man is completely free to act according to his lost and sinful nature...but he is incable of choosing Christ or performing righteously because it is against his fallen nature. Calvinists do not deny a lost man's freedom...they simply restrict it (as the Bible does!) to freely act according to his fallen nature and it's sinful desires. It is God Who sovereignly rectifies this situation by opening his eyes to his lostness and granting him the gift of repentance and faith...and thus the lost person believes in Christ and chooses eternal life.

Bookmark and Share
> posted by Jim Leavenworth at 3 Comments Links to this post

A STRONG TOWER











My music selection for today has been, A Strong Tower by the SoundForth Singers and Orchestra. This is the sixth album by the SoundForth Singers and Orchestra. It focuses on the name of the Lord—our strong tower.


I downloaded the album at SacredAudio.com. Here is the link to the album: Strong Tower

Here is information about Sacredaudio.com

Today's world is full of sounds and messages that can draw the
Christian away from a focus on Christ and His Word. SacredAudio.com
seeks to counter those sounds and messages by providing music that
encourages the Christian in his personal walk for the Lord, builds his
character, and strengthens him for service. It is our desire to have
the largest and best selection of conservative Christian music
available on the web for download--and to represent the finest
conservative Christian music labels and independent producers


You can buy a Gift Certificate for that special person so they can download music. If you cannot think of anyone to buy a Gift Certificate for, I would be willing to get one. :)


Download some good music and have a great night.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 2 Comments Links to this post

Christopher Hitchens

The following was found at Aomin.org


Christopher Hitchens and Doug Wilson debated on the campus of Westminster Theological Seminary (East) on October 30, 2008. The debate was moderated by Dr. Scott Oliphint, professor of apologetics at WTS.

The debate can be heard by clicking here. The debate is the 12th item on the list.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

TobyMac- Lose my soul

Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 1 Comments Links to this post

The Election Of Barack Obama



















How should Christians respond the election of Barack Obama as the President of the United States? Wednesday night I preached a sermon on King Manasseh from 1 Kings 21. In the sermon I talked about how Christians should respond to our new president. You can listen to the message here:

Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Friday, November 7, 2008

A Response To The 10 Indictments

One of the most popular sermons on the Internet right now is, 10 Indictments Against the Modern Church in America by Paul Washer. It is truly an amazing sermon that should convict all who hear it! However, when I listened to the sermon the thought that came to my mind was this, many will have their emotions stirred but how many will have their lives changed? I believe God is the one who must change the life and I pray God will work mightily through the sermon. I recorded a message challenging people to put the sermon into practice and not just get excited about it.

You can listen to my sermon here:


Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

It's Friday!













Friday night is finally here! I wanted to take a few minutes and let the readers know what new thins to be looking for. I will be working this weekend on finishing and posting the following things on the blog.


1. The pre sermon on Head Coverings: I posted a few days ago an article dealing with the subject of head coverings and informing people of the, Those Head Coverings blog. Last Sunday I preached part 4 of the sermons dealing with he subject. Before I post that sermon I want to record a message giving some final thoughts that I think people need to hear before listening to the last sermon. I hope to record and post that tonight. For those who would like to listen to the sermons in the series, you can find them at this link:


Head Coverings




2. The Deadly Disease. I will try to record part 4 of the series, Deadly Disease.
In this series I am teaching on the subject of false teachers and heresy. I think it is a very helpful series. You can listen to what I have taught so far by following this link:

Disease

I hope to have both messages recorded soon and posted here and at www.sermonaudio.com/vbc


If you are looking for a place to attend church this weekend. We invite you to attend Victory Baptist Church. We are located about 20 minutes south of Abilene, TX in the small town of Ovalo, TX. Sunday School is at 10:00am and morning worship is at 11:00am. Sunday evening service is at 6:00pm. For more information or directions call me at 325-695-8202


Please check back here for new post and new audio messages to be posted soon. Have a great weekend.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Thursday, November 6, 2008

James White On The Election.

Bookmark and Share
> posted by Charles Fry at 0 Comments Links to this post

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

King Solomon's Mines 'discovered'












The following was found at the, Answer In Genesis website.


“Mine from Time of King Solomon Found”


Once again, a bit of biblical history has been matched up with an archaeological finding.

A team led by archaeologists from the United States and Jordan has made a discovery of perhaps biblical proportions at the Ruins of Copper (Arabic “Khirbat en-Nahas”), a region south of the Dead Sea now lying in Jordan.

The site has been known for decades to have hosted metalworking dating back some seven centuries BC. But the current team, led by Thomas Levy of the University of California–San Diego and Mohammad Najjar of Jordan’s Friends of Archaeology, unearthed materials such as seeds and sticks that are claimed to be from the 10th century BC. That was the time of King Solomon, whom the Bible notes was “greater in riches . . . than all the other kings of the earth” (1 Kings 10:23) and who had unprecedented access to natural resources, presumably including copper, but also many others from sources near and far.

As for Levy, he cautions that “We can’t believe everything ancient writings tell us” even while acknowledging that his research “represents a confluence between the archaeological and scientific data and the Bible.”

We might ask Levy just why it is that we can’t believe what the Bible (which we presume is the main target of “ancient writings”) tells us, even when his own research reminds us of the accuracy of this specific part of it. Our expectation is that Levy’s answer would center on either his presupposed religious beliefs or his acceptance of evolution in explaining the origin of life and the history of humanity. But when we start from the Bible, we find it makes perfect sense of the science we conduct and the observations we make.

In related news, BBC News reports on what could be the oldest Hebrew text found to date: five lines on a shard of pottery found at a dig 20 km southwest of Jerusalem. Researchers are still working to translate the full text, which is written in proto-Canaanite, a precursor of the Hebrew alphabet. A few of the words have been translated already, including “judge,” “slave,” and “king.” But for now, they can’t be entirely sure it was the language of the ancient Hebrews, as opposed to a related language spoken in the same area.

What’s behind most of the headlines, however, is the dating of the pottery at just around 3,000 years ago—the time of King David (and just before King Solomon). Because the pottery and other artifacts where found near the Valley of Elah, where the Bible says David fought Goliath, lead archaeologist Yosef Garfinkel believes “the findings could shed significant light on the period of King David's reign,” reports the BBC.

The Associated Press reports that the “discoveries are already being wielded in a vigorous and ongoing argument over whether the Bible’s account of events and geography is meant to be taken literally.” We certainly can’t imagine what person familiar with, in this case, 2 Samuel would suggest it’s meant to be taken as anything other than literal history!

The report also adds a comment by archaeologist Israel Finkelstein, who cautioned against “the belief that what’s written in the Bible is accurate like a newspaper.” Thankfully, we know that the Bible is much more accurate than newspapers are! And while an artifact from the time of David would be a wonderful discovery, we do not use “evidence” to prove or disprove Scripture; that would be setting up something (in this case, archaeology—and carbon dating) as an authority over Scripture.



For more information about this story read the following articles:


King Solomon's Mines 'discovered'


Jordan copper mines from biblical times could be King Solomon’s


King Solomon’s Mines and the Empire of King David
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

In Thy Light












This Evening's Meditation.
By
C. H. Spurgeon

"In Thy light shall we see light."—Psalm 36:9.

No lips can tell the love of Christ to the heart till Jesus Himself shall speak within. Descriptions all fall flat and tame unless the Holy Ghost fills them with life and power; till our Immanuel reveals Himself within, the soul sees Him not. If you would see the sun, would you gather together the common means of illumination, and seek in that way to behold the orb of day? No, the wise man knoweth that the sun must reveal itself, and only by its own blaze can that mighty lamp be seen. It is so with Christ. "Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-jona:" said He to Peter, "for flesh and blood hath not revealed this unto thee." Purify flesh and blood by any educational process you may select, elevate mental faculties to the highest degree of intellectual power, yet none of these can reveal Christ. The Spirit of God must come with power, and overshadow the man with His wings, and then in that mystic holy of holies the Lord Jesus must display Himself to the sanctified eye, as He doth not unto the purblind sons of men. Christ must be His own mirror. The great mass of this blear-eyed world can see nothing of the ineffable glories of Immanuel. He stands before them without form or comeliness, a root out of a dry ground, rejected by the vain and despised by the proud. Only where the Spirit has touched the eye with eye-salve, quickened the heart with divine life, and educated the soul to a heavenly taste, only there is He understood. "To you that believe He is precious"; to you He is the chief corner-stone, the Rock of your salvation, your all in all; but to others He is "a stone of stumbling and a rock of offence." Happy are those to whom our Lord manifests Himself, for His promise to such is that He will make His abode with them. O Jesus, our Lord, our heart is open, come in, and go out no more for ever. Show Thyself to us now! Favour us with a glimpse of Thine all-conquering charms.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

The Election and The Black Panthers

I know that people today will be following the election, so I posted a video that many people may be interested to watch. It is posted at the Worldview blog.

Here is the link: Video
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Preaching For Truth...Or Emotional Impact?
















The goal of preaching is to simply give the meaning of the text and then apply the truth of the text to those who are listening. However, today preaching is more about moving emotions then providing a truthful exposition of the text! Today I was listening to a sermon that provides a great example of this.

The sermon was preached at North Side Baptist Church in Abilene, TX. The name of the sermon is The Seven Cross Utterances #1.

You can find the sermon at this link: Crown of Thorns



Early on in the sermon the pastor begins to talk about the suffering Jesus endured before he was placed on the cross. The pastor said the following,

"And they took those crucifixion thorns, poisonous thorns, thorns that would make your body react like it would if your were bitten by a rattlesnake. Poison it put in your system that would make you swell. In fact historians say and the book of Isaiah chapter 52 tells us that when they put the crown of thorns on him he head swelled until he no longer looked like a human."




Now that may move the emotions but here is the real issue, is it true?

Let's look at the claim:

1. The thorns were poisonous:

The International Bible Encyclopedia tells us the follwoing:

CROWN OF THORNS

thornz (akdnthinos stephanos):

Three of the four evangelists mention the crown of thorns, wherewith the rude Roman soldiers derided the captive Christ (Matthew 27:29; Mark 15:17; John 19:2). All speak of the akanthine (Acanthus) crown, but there is no certainty about the peculiar plant, from the branches of which this crown of cruel mockery was plaited. The rabbinical books. mention no less than twenty-two words in the Bible signifying thorny plants, and the word akantha in the New Testament Greek is a generic and not a specific term. And this word or its adjective is used in the three Gospels, quoted above. It is therefore impossible definitely to determine what was the exact plant or tree, whose thorny branches were selected for this purpose. Tobler (Denkbl., 113, 179) inclines to the Spina Christi, as did Hasselquist. Its botanical name is Zizyphus Spina Christi, It is very common in the East. Its spines are small and sharp, its branches soft, round and pliable, and the leaves look like ivy, with a dark, shiny green color, making them therefore very adaptable to the purpose of the soldiers. Others have designated the Paliurus aculeatus or the Lycium horridum. Both Geikie (Life of Christ, 549) and Farrar (Life of Christ, note 625) point to the Nubk (Zizyphus lotus). Says the latter, "The Nubk struck me, as it has all travelers in Palestine, as being most suitable both for mockery and pain, since its leaves are bright and its thorns singularly strong. But though the Nubk is very common on the shores of Galilee, I saw none of it near Jerusalem." The settlement of the question is manifestly impossible.




They do not mention the thorns being poisonous.

The pastor provided no source to verify his claim.

There is not scripture at all to support the claim.

Easton's Bible Dictionary tells us this:


Our Lord was crowned with a, in mockery by the Romans (Matthew 27:29). The object of Pilate's guard in doing this was probably to insult, and not specially to inflict pain. There is nothing to show that the shrub thus used was, as has been supposed, the spina Christi, which could have been easily woven into a wreath. It was probably the thorny nabk, which grew abundantly round about Jerusalem, and whose flexible, pliant, and round branches could easily be platted into the form of a crown.



So where is the proof of the claim? Was the pastor more concerned with stirring emotions than giving truth?

2. The effects of the posion: Even if the thorns were poisonous the bible does not record it's effects.

3. The book of Isaiah: The pastor makes the amazing claim that the book of Isaiah chapter 52 reports that the crown of thorns made the head of Jesus swell until he no longer looked like a human. Wow, what a claim. Is it true? Here is the passage in Isaiah 52:

13 Behold, my servant shall deal prudently, he shall be exalted and extolled, and be very high. 14 As many were astonied at thee; his visage was so marred more than any man, and his form more than the sons of men: 15 So shall he sprinkle many nations; the kings shall shut their mouths at him: for that which had not been told them shall they see; and that which they had not heard shall they consider.

The text does not say anything about a crown of thorns! It does not say his head would swell so he did not look like a human!

That may move emotions but it is not true!



Listen to the sermon yourself and tell me what you think.


Let us strive to be more concerned with truth then moving emotions!
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Give Me Your Eyes

This is such a great song I have to post it one more time. Listen to the words and think about it! We all need to see people and situations differently! Dear God give us a love for people!


Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Monday, November 3, 2008

Head Coverings






















It all started as a verse-by-verse journey through the book of 1 Corinthians but suddenly the journey ended up crashing into a piece of cloth! We studied many things, sexual sin, church discipline, Christians suing Christians, sexual relationship in marriage, and divorce. You would think one of those topics would have been controversial! But everything was silent until I came to 1 Corinthians 11 and preached on the topic of head coverings! I received an e-mail pointing me to a post on a blog. The name of the blog is Those Head coverings. Take a guess what the blog is all about? Wow, you are right, head coverings. This is what they had to say about my sermons on the topic:


I'm currently listening to, but haven't finished yet, listening to the preacher at the site above speaking on the passages in 1 Corinthians discussing head coverings and women in worship. The preacher is handling this as a touchy, difficult passage, so it takes him quite a while to get to the subject, because he's trying to deal with the sensitivities of his audience and soften things with a conversational (almost rambling) tone. But he makes some good points in there about obedience and authority. [The important subject is that of the role of women, as presented in the Bible, and it is not a well-received or understood topic in our part of the world; but it is necessary to understanding the place of "headcovering".] A three part lesson so far, each section about an hour long.


Not a derogatory post but I did find a few things interesting:

The preacher is handling this as a touchy, difficult passage, so it takes him quite a while to get to the subject.

Actually I am trying my best to do a verse-by-verse study of the text. The first two verses are not about head coverings but they are a part of the text and must be studied if you are going got actually preach the text.

This statement made me laugh:

Because he's trying to deal with the sensitivities of his audience and soften things with a conversational (almost rambling) tone.


I have never been accused in my 8 years as a pastor of being sensitive to my audience. I preach the truth of the text whether it offends or pleases the audience.


Almost rambling: I went back and listened to all three sermons and I truly believe I stated on topic the entire time. I must once again stress the goal. This is a verse-by-verse study of 1 Corinthians 11. If people are not familiar with expositional preaching, then it may come across as rambling.

Someone posted a comment and said this about my sermons on this subject:


I listen to part 1 and 2. He didn't seem to say anything at all. It seemed to me he was saying "we don't know and we can't know because it's from the past. and we don't really know what is going on there"
I've got to go to work, but will listen to part 3 when i get back from it and running all my errands.
Not a bad idea to listen to sermons while cleaning - I should do it more often (both the sermons and the cleaning)



2 hours of my preaching and I didn't say anything at all! That hurts (that is said in a joking manner)



I posted a comment to respond to everything:


Thanks for posting the link to my sermon. I apologize if I appeared to be rambling. I truly want to deal with the text in a fair and detailed manner. I know that any conclusion I come to will be rejected by many. Lock 10 people in a room and have all of them read 1 Corinthians 11 and you will probably end up with 10 different ideas on what the text means and how we should apply it. I will finish the section on Head coverings this Sunday morning. I will post the audio of the message hopefully by Sunday afternoon. All my sermons are posted at www.sermonaudio.com/vbc and I also post the audio for many of the sermons at www.preachtoday.blogspot.com

Thanks again for posting the link and I will strive to improve on my preaching ability.

God bless

Pastor

Trevor Hammack


The author of the original post responded with this:

Hi - I appreciate your writing back to my post. I don't want to appear critical of your preaching, but was trying to point out to my readers that yours is not a cut and dried "here's how it is" sermon, but more of a conversational informal setting, in which you're trying to present controversial subjects in such a way as one must usually do in a public setting where you've got folks from a wide variety of backgrounds and understandings. Some of the preachers on these subjects are short and to the point as to what they believe, but perhaps because their target audience is more likely to understand and agree with where they're coming from. You are right - people will interpret these things, and all of scripture (especially the letters to the churches) as they want to read them. I know that God will judge our hearts, and not our "church answers" or church behaviors, whether we wear a scarf to pray or not. I do thank you for posting your "rambling" thoughts out loud, and sharing them with your group, because you do make many good points and parallels to other scripture to back up the understanding of the scriptures themselves as we have them. Looking forward to the end (?) of the series. -


A very nice response and I appreciate the person taking the time to write.


On Sunday the following was posted on the, Those Head Coverings blog:

This was posted as the QUOTE OF THE WEEK!

... What I saw at the Feast [of Sukkot] convinced me that if women of today weren't surrounded with all the garbage telling them that head coverings are "not necessary" or "bad" or "suppress you" or "are things of the past" or "just not necessary" or any of the other bogus and completely useless and unscriptural reasons to not ever wear one---then they would probably not be so opposed to it. Unfortunately our society has actually been the force suppressing women from being and doing what comes natural--head coverings in attire among other things.


Wow, so if I come to the conclusion that 1 Corinthians 11 does not command women to wear head coverings today then I am handing out garbage!


I have no desire to suppress women. In fact I do not want them to be in bondage to any mere human tradition or custom. I want them to live a life obedient to Christ and his word.

Here are some articles about the subject of head coverings:

Coverings

What is the Head Covering in 1 Cor 11:2-16 and Does it Apply to Us Today?


Here are the original sermons I preached so the reader can listen for themselves:












I preached part 4 Sunday morning but I am not ready to post it yet. I need to listen to it one more time and I am doing more study on the subject.


I hope all the information I have posted here will be of some help to someone.
Have a great night.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 1 Comments Links to this post

Bart Ehrman's Presuppositions











This will be short...one of Christianity's most vocal, and very listened to, critics is Dr Bart Ehrman. Dr. Ehrman will be debated by Dr. James White on January 21st on the subject, "Does the Bible Misquote Jesus"- you can go to this link for more information; http://sovereigncruises.org/AO2009/debate.htm

Our church has a member that's been attacked recently by a supposed "Christian" professor at a local "Christian" university. You would expect that a supposedly Christian professor at a supposedly Christian university would not belittle and mock believers for trusting in their Bibles, right? Not so with this school...and it seems that Dr Ehrman is one of the professors favorites...with his book as a mandatory textbook.

So...we're immersing ourselves in the views of Bart Ehrman with the goal of understanding his arguments so as to be able to better equip our folks in our church and to rebut the latest anti-Christian "scholarship." You can listen to the source, Bart Ehrman himself, at his website; http://bartdehrman.com/

He has a great website that has all his debates and interviews which can be downloaded and listened to for free...very nice! I'm currently listening to his debate with Dr William Lane Craig. Listen for yourself...at roughly the 55 min or so (plus or minus) he displays an amazing lack of "scholarship" and he seems paralyzed by intense presuppositions. See if you can hear the same things I did. Here are a few quick thoughts...

#1- First he tries to rebut Dr. Craig's assertion that the NT's writers documenting of women as the first eyewitness of the resurrected Christ (women's testimony back then was zip!) as evidence of the validity of the truth of the resurrection is false. He says that Paul never mentioned the women (like this proves what?)...and that only Mark and the "later gospels" mention the women. First I'm not sure what he means by "later Gospels" and 2nd - all 4 Gospels do actually mention the witness of the women! (Matt 28:1-6, Mark 16:1-8, Luke 24:1-9 & John 20:1-2). What's your point Dr. Ehrman...which Gospels are you referring to...Gnostic ones?

#2- He then goes into a long explanation that makes no sense whatsoever...he says Mark was written 35-40 years after the resurrection (first, what proof? second, many date it much earlier- what's the point again?), that Mark's big theme was that nobody (Jews, leaders, apostles, his family) knew the real identity of Jesus except people who were outsiders (he uses women annointing him, centurion at the cross and the "previously unknown" women at the tomb). Since the women at the tomb fits in too nicely with Mark's "literary theme" then it can't be a historical event.
Huh? Isn't this all based on the fact that Dr Ehrman starts off with the presupposition that the Bible is literary, religious material existing outside of history? He makes the claim that the bible is "not data." Isn't it the Bible's claim to be historical? Isn't religion without truth in history nothing more than a fable? Yes...but that's as far as Dr Ehrman's willing to let it go. The women can't be evidence of the resurrection because they're just part of a neat literary style created (made up) by whoever wrote Mark...go ahead and believe in the resurrection, just don't claim it's a historical event with credible and reliable historical evidence is his theme.

Presupposition are dangerous...for everyone. Beware of your own!
Regarding Dr Ehrman's thought process, a verse comes to mind; 1 Corinthians 2:14- "But the natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; nor can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Jim Leavenworth at 0 Comments Links to this post

Study The Bible

Growing up in church, the pastor would always say, you need to study your Bible. The problem was I didn't know how!

Well if you are like I was, here is some good news.
Victory Baptist Church (Reformed) has a Bible study series on how to study the Bible.

You can download the series and listen to it at your convenience.

Here are the first four methods of study:







Bookmark and Share
> posted by Charles Fry at 0 Comments Links to this post

The Results Of Denying Sola Scriptura

When professing Christians deny the fact that the scriptures are the final authority and the only way God speaks to us today, this happens:


Prophecy

Prophecy 2

Prophecy 3

Notice they are supposedly listening to God speak and yet no one in the audience has a bible open!
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Justification



The Importance of Justification
By R. C. Sproul

The Importance of Justification Sola fide (by faith alone) is important not merely because the church stands or falls on it. It is important because on it we stand or fall. The place where and the time when we will either stand or fall is at the judgment seat of God.

The doctrine of justification has to do with our status before the just judgment of God. That every person will ultimately be called into account before God is central to the teaching of Jesus. He warns that the secret things of our lives will be made manifest before the Father and that every idle word we have spoken will be brought into judgment. The whole world -- every man, woman, and child -- will come before the final divine tribunal. We will all come to that place, at that time, as either unjustified or justified sinners. Paul at Mars Hill warned: "Truly, these times of ignorance God overlooked, but now commands
all men every where to repent, `because He has appointed a day on which He will judge the world in righteousness by the Man whom He has ordained.'" (Acts 17:30-31 NKJV)

This judgment will be a righteous judgment by a righteous God. Those who will be judged are unrighteous people. The universality of sin is clearly affirmed by Paul:

"For we have previously charged both Jews and Greeks that they are all (italics mine) under sin. As it is written: "There is none righteous, no, not one...." Now we know that whatever the law says, it says to those who are under the law, that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God. Therefore by the deeds of the law no flesh will be justified in His sight, for by the law is the knowledge of sin." (Romans 3:9-10, 19-20 NKJV)

Herein is our dilemma. There will be a judgment. It will be a righteous judgment. As fallen, we are not righteous.

The ominous warning of the apostle is that "no flesh will be justified in His sight." Fortunately this is not the whole sentence. It is not an absolute denial of justification. If there will be no justification in his sight, then all disputes about the way of justification
would be vain disputes, much ado about nothing. If there is no justification, then there is no gospel -- no good news, only bad news.

But this is not the entire statement. Paul does not say there will be no justification. What he does say is that no flesh will be justified in God's sight by the deeds of the law.

Paul does not exclude justification altogether. He does exclude it by virtue of our doing deeds of the law. Justification on the ground of our works is eliminated as an option. Christians were once debtors who could not pay their debts to God. The law of God requires perfection. It is a requirement sinners do not and cannot meet. Because of the universal reality of sin, Paul comes to his "therefore." Our sin leads to the necessary inference contained in the conclusion that by the deeds of the law no flesh will be justified in God's sight.

The verdict of the law on sinners was known in the Old Testament. Psalm 130 asks a question that is clearly rhetorical: "If You, Lord, should mark iniquities, O Lord, who could stand?" (130:3 NKJV)

The answer to the psalmist's question is abundantly clear Who could stand? No one. Certainly not I. Certainly not you. If we are judged by the law in terms of our own righteousness, we will not stand; we are certainly fallen. If Luther rested on his own
righteousness before the diet of heaven, he would have to declare: "Here I fall! I can do no other, God help me."

Not only would Luther fall. The whole church -- nay, the whole world -- would fall.

Paul does not leave us falling without hope before the righteous law of God. He continues his teaching of the doctrine of justification with a single word that screams relief to guilty sinners: "But..." There is, to our everlasting benefit, a "however" to his declaration. This little however introduces a high and mighty exception to the dreadful conclusion that by the deeds of the law no flesh will be justified in God's sight. Though justification is categorically denied by one means, it is now categorically affirmed by another means. That no flesh will be justified is not the final word. There is another word, which is the gospel itself:

"But now the righteousness of God apart from the law is revealed, being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets, even the righteousness of God which is through faith in Jesus Christ to all and on all who believe. For there is no difference; for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, being justified freely by His grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, whom God set forth to be a propitiation by His blood, through faith, to demonstrate His righteousness, because in His forbearance God had passed over the sins that were previously committed, to demonstrate at the present time His righteousness, that He might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus." (Romans 3:21-26 NKJV)

Here Paul declares a way of justification different from justification by deeds of the law. It is not a novelty, proclaimed for the first time in the New Testament. This way of justification is witnessed to by the Prophets and by the law itself. It is justification
through faith in Jesus Christ. This justification is not given to everyone. It is provided to all and on all, who believe. It is based on the righteousness of God that is provided to and on the believer. It is given both freely and graciously by God through the redeeming work of Christ. This manner of justification demonstrates God himself to be both just and the justifier.

Again,the dilemma faced by the sinner summoned to the judgment seat of God is this: The sinner must appear before a divine Judge who is perfectly just. Yet the sinner is unjust. How can he possibly be unjust and justified? The answer to this question touches the eye of the Reformation tornado. For God to justify the impious (iustificatio impii) and himself remain just in the process, the sinner must somehow become actually just by a righteousness supplied him by another.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Charles Fry at 1 Comments Links to this post

M10.28


M10.28
Released in 2000 by Lock Horn Limited
This is an intense discussion starter drama about 3 girls who attend a party which turns out to be a nightmare!

Mary Turned Away.

Sarah Didn't Care.

Natalie knew better.

On a cool October night each will make a choice that will ensnare them all in horrifying consequences.

M 10.28 is about the invisible struggle between right and wrong. It is a story of the physical death awaiting everyone and the certainty of the two resurrections on the other side: one a resurrection into life, the other into unspeakable horrors. Each is eternal, each the result of choices made while on earth.

Rebellion. Manipulation. Conscience. Redemption. Prepare to be shaken and disturbed. M 10.28 will remain with you long after the last credit line has faded to black.

For a secular audience and a lukewarm group, this movie will grab people's attention and be a wake up call to any viewer. Eternity is coming. You go to heaven or hell. And Jesus Christ is the only answer to make sense of life.

One of the BEST movies to make people see the reality of HELL.

Buy it Here.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Charles Fry at 1 Comments Links to this post

Sunday, November 2, 2008

The Seven Churches Of Revelation










This sunday night I started a series of sermons on the Seven Churches of Revelation.

Here is the message



Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

The Deadly Disease Of Heresy












Last Sunday night I preached a sermon called, The Disease Of Heresy. When I was done I realized that this is an important topic, and one in which much more could be said. I decided that I would spend the week in my devotional time studying the topic. So each time I sat down at my desk to study I turned on the microphone and recorded my time of study. I had no prepared notes just my bible and the text I wanted to look at for that time of study. I think the messages will be helpful to many. Here is the original sermon and all the devotional studies as well. Please leave comments letting me know what you are learning or just share your own thoughts on the topic.
















Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

"Somebody's Daughter" Raises Pornography Awareness

The following was found at Crosswalk.com

Pornography succeeds in luring about 40 million adults in the United States annually into its many traps. This includes untold numbers of Christian leaders and pastors who struggle against its daily attraction and stumble in the fight.

The September release of the DVD-CD set “Somebody’s Daughter: A Journey to Freedom from Pornography” focuses on this struggle of Christians in ministry. Oct. 26 through Nov. 2 is Pornography Awareness Week, and the makers “Somebody’s Daughter” hope the DVD will not only promote awareness but also help those facing the addiction.

“Somebody’s Daughter” is a multimedia release featuring a television documentary, which details the lives of three men and one couple active in Christian ministry, who struggled with and overcame addiction to pornography. It addresses the universal appeal of pornography, speaking to individuals, families and churches.

You can rad the rest of the article at this link:
Pornography











For more information see The Somebody’s Daughter website at this link:
Daughter
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Saturday, November 1, 2008

Clocks Fall Back an Hour Sunday Morning

The following was found at foxnews.com

WASHINGTON — It's time to fall back.

Standard time returns this weekend at 2 a.m. Sunday, so set your clocks back an hour before going to sleep Saturday night.

The change means most Americans will get an extra hour of rest, but those working overnight shifts might toil an hour longer. It also means some will forget to change their clocks, and show up early for church or other events on Sunday.

Daylight time returns in March.

The time change doesn't apply in Arizona, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands.

State fire marshals are using the event to remind homeowners daylight savings time is a good time to replace the batteries in their fire alarms.

He reports that about 90 percent of American homes have smoke alarms, but about one-third of them don't work due to age or dead or missing batteries.

Last year in Minnesota, for example, about a quarter of fire deaths took place in homes without working smoke alarms — and half of the deaths happened between November and February
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

What Old Testament Book?

At Victory Baptist Church we usually preach from the New Testament on Sunday mornings and the Old Testament on Sunday evenings. I am trying to figure what Old Testament book I should begin preaching through next. So I am asking you, what Old Testament book would you like to study next? post your answers here in the comments section or e-mail them to me at tsrk30@sbcglobal.net


Have a great Saturday
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 1 Comments Links to this post

History of the Eastern Orthodox Church

To understand the Greek Orthodox Church you must study a lot of Church history. I want to provide people at least a basic overview of the history of the Greek Orthodox Church. The best I could find was the Wikipedia article. Wikipedia is not the best source but it can point you to some information that you can then check and study in other sources. So as you read the article understand that you need to check the claims with other sources as well.

Here is the link to History of the Eastern Orthodox Church
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

What is the proper name for the Orthodox Church?

What is the proper name for the Orthodox Church? One sees so many, and of such different variety!


It must be understood first of all that names like Greek Orthodox, Russian Orthodox, Syrian Orthodox, Serbian Orthodox, Romanian Orthodox, etc. are all names for one and the same Church with one and the same faith and practice. Of course within these churches there are cultural differences which do not touch the essence of the faith as such.

Sometimes the Orthodox Church is also called the Eastern Orthodox Church, or the Oriental Church, or the Christian Church of the East, or the Orthodox Catholic Church, or the Graeco-Russian Church. But once more, these are all different names for the same Church.

Care must be exercised not to confuse the Orthodox Church with the Eastern Christian Churches in union with the See of Rome: the so-called Uniates, or Byzantine or Greek Catholics. And also there is the distinction to be made between the Orthodox and the so-called Oriental Orthodox or Lesser Eastern Churches such as the Coptic Church, the Ethiopian, Syrian, Armenian, Indian, and other churches which are very close to the Orthodox Church but not part of it.

In America it must be noticed that the new autocephalous (self-governing) Church which used to be the Russian Orthodox Church of America is now simply called the Orthodox Church in America.


To read the original question and answer follow this link:
Questions
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

History of the Orthodox Church in America

A few days ago I posted an article informing people that the Greek Orthodox Church in America is growing. Many christians know very little about the Orthodox church and can not offer much of a response to it. So today I want to provide people with the histroy of the Orthodox Church in America.

A History and Introduction of the Orthodox Church in America Written by the Very Rev. John Matusiak
Director of Communications, Orthodox Church in America

The Orthodox Church in America traces its origins to the arrival in Kodiak, Alaska of eight Orthodox missionaries from the Valaamo Monastery in the northern Karelia region of Russia in 1794. The missionaries made a great impact on the native Alaskan population and were responsible for bringing many to the Orthodox Christian faith.

Today, the Orthodox Church in America numbers some 700 parishes, missions, communities, monasteries, and institutions throughout the United States, Canada, and Mexico.

In the 1820s, Father John Veniaminov arrived in Alaska and also conducted missionary work. Among his many accomplishments was the translation of Scripture and the liturgical services into the native dialects, for which he also devised a grammar and alphabet.

Around 1840 Father John was elected to the episcopacy, taking the name Innocent. The Church continued to grow among the native Alaskans, but Bishop Innocent also visited California and the Orthodox community at Fort Ross, north of San Francisco. He eventually returned to Russia, where he was named Metropolitan of Moscow. [In 1977, he was glorified (canonized) by the Russian Orthodox Church as a Saint of the Orthodox Church.]

While the Church continued to grow in Alaska, immigrants began arriving in what we today call the lower 48. In the 1860s a parish was established in San Francisco by Serbians, Russians and Greeks. [Today this parish is the OCA's Holy Trinity Cathedral.] Gradually other similar parishes were established across the territory of the United States and, with the great waves of immigrants from Central and Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Southern Europe at the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century, the headquarters of the North American Orthodox Diocese was moved to San Francisco and later to New York. By the early 1900s almost all Orthodox communities, regardless of ethnic background, were united in a single diocese, or jurisdiction, which was under the Russian Orthodox Church. In fact, the first bishop for Arab-Americans, Bishop Raphael Hawaweeny, was also the first Orthodox Christian to be consecrated to the episcopacy in North America. He and the parishes under his direction were an integral part of the North American Diocese. [Bishop Raphael was glorified as a saint in May 2000 by the Orthodox Church in America.]

In 1917 the Russian Revolution broke out. As a result communications between the North American Diocese and the Church in Russia were greatly hindered. In the early 1920s the Patriarch of Moscow, Saint Tikhon for ten years he had served as Bishop of the North American Diocese issued a decree calling on dioceses outside the borders of Russia [by then the Soviet Union] to organize themselves autonomously until such time as normal communications and relations with the Church in Russia could resume. Shortly thereafter, at a Council of all hierarchs and clergy and parish delegates, it was decided that the Church in North America could no longer maintain strict administrative ties with the Church in Russia, especially since Patriarch Tikhon had been arrested. [He subsequently died in 1925, and glorified as a Saint by the Russian Orthodox Church in 1989.]

Concurrently, various ethnic groups which had been an integral part of the single diocese organized separate dioceses, or jurisdictions, and placed themselves under their respective Mother Churches. This gave rise to the present situation of Orthodoxy in North America, namely the existence of multiple, overlapping jurisdictions based on ethnic background, rather than following the canonical principle of a single Church entity in a given territory.

In the early 1960s the OCA at that time it was known as the Russian Orthodox Greek Catholic Church of North America, or The Metropolia entered into dialogue with the Moscow Patriarchate in an attempt to regularize the Metropolias status. In 1970 the Metropolia once again entered into communion with the Moscow Patriarchate, which promptly granted it autocephaly, or administrative self-governance. At a Council of hierarchs, clergy and laity held at Saint Tikhon's Monastery, South Canaan, Pennsylvania in the same year, it was decided that the Church should be renamed The Orthodox Church in America.

Today the OCA, in addition to counting the parishes of the former Metropolia, includes the Romanian Orthodox Episcopate, the Albanian Orthodox Archdiocese, and the Bulgarian Orthodox Diocese. Further, within the past two decades the OCA has established over 220 new parishes, almost exclusively non-ethnic in origin and employing only the English language in worship. [Virtually all of the former Metropolia parishes now employ English exclusively in the services.]

The Orthodox Church in America is a full member of the Standing Conference of Canonical Orthodox Bishops in the Americas (SCOBA), together with the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America, the Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese of North America, and the other member jurisdictions. Hierarchs and clergy of the OCA regularly concelebrate with clergy of other SCOBA jurisdictions. This is especially evident on the annual celebration of the Triumph of Orthodoxy on the first Sunday of Great Lent.

As a self-governing Church, the OCA has the right to elect its own Primate, or presiding hierarch, without relying on any ecclesiastical entity abroad for ratification. His Beatitude, Metropolitan Herman, the current Primate of the Orthodox Church in America, presides at meetings of the Holy Synod of Bishops, consecrates Holy Chrism, and carries out other duties appropriate to his office.

The Orthodox Church in America is fully committed to the unity of Orthodoxy in North America. Metropolitan Herman is an outspoken advocate for administrative unity among the Orthodox Christians in North America according to the canonical principle of a single, united Church in a given geographic territory.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

FREE JOHN MACARTHUR SERMONS!

Here is some great news:
















So on November 5, 2008 make sure you visit Grace to You and download as many sermons as you can!
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post