Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Thursday, July 31, 2008

Thanks & Praise!

Typically I’ve known prayer to start with praise for God and then thanks to God. It reflects the Lord’s prayer as an example…Father…Hallowed, Blessed, Holy is your name…

Praise to God is for WHO he is.
Thanks to God is for WHAT he has done.

Personally, the order has been praise then thanks. But I’ve discovered that it’s easier if I reverse them. You see, I’ve found that if I first begin to think of all the things God has done in my life, I can then more personally and from the heart give praise to God for who he is.

My struggle was that by first giving praise to God for who he is, with thanksgiving following, I found that I was praising God because I was supposed to and it was more intellectual assent to the facts that God is good, holy, etc.

But my praise to God is more personal and heartfelt after thinking of all God has done for me and giving thanks for that. You see, I can more sincerely praise God for his being good when I remember how he demonstrated his goodness to me by doing something good in my life for which I gave thanks.

Or, I can better praise God for being merciful when I recall how he has shown that by forgiving me of my sin. And I can more greatly praise God for his wisdom when he works things out in my life that didn’t make sense until after I got through them and in hindsight I saw the whole picture.

This also reminded me of how in scripture the Israelites were told over and over again to remember and tell all their children and subsequent generations about all God did for them when he brought them out of Egypt. It is by all that God did that people can praise God for who he is, for God’s character, his traits, is demonstrated and exemplified by his actions. His actions show us who he is!

Recall John 3:16. God loved the world. God is loving. What does love do? It gives! God gave his only son. Jesus gave his life. It is also stated in Romans 5:8. God demonstrated his love toward us in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us! Hallelujah! You see, when we recall the things God has done for us, not only do we give thanks, but we can then truly praise God for being so loving and merciful.

Here’s some challenging follow up for you. Can you find how this idea is supported in the Psalms in the numerous times David thanked and praised God? Are there good examples?

Also, can you recall things God has done in your own life that will cause you to praise God for his justice and jealousy?
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Jason McFadden at 0 Comments Links to this post

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Keep Your Eyes on the Saviour


In my studies on particular redemption (I'm preparing a study of the common "problem passages" that people throw in the faces of those who believe in particular redemption) I was reading Spurgeon's comments on John 1:29:



John 1:29 29 The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.


I thought this quote, while having nothing to do with my study topic per se, was worth sharing to all my brothers and sisters in Christ, may it be an encouragement to you...and an admonition if needed:


This quote is from Spurgeon's sermon entitled, "The Baptist's Message" preached on October 29, 1899:



Our great difficulty is to get men’s eyes off themselves, off their works, off their forms and ceremonies, off mere creed-religion, and to get them to look at the living Christ who is still among us bearing the sin of all who truly seek his face. O dear hearers, I know that I am, in this
respect, a faithful witness, wherever else I fail in my testimony, for my soul’s labor and travail, even unto anguish, is to get you away from depending even in the slightest degree upon anything else but what Christ has done. I would not wish you to have the shadow of a shade of a ghost
of a pretense of a confidence anywhere out of Christ. Jesus only is the one hope of sinners; let him be A to you, and Z, and all the letters between, the beginning and the end, and the middle, and everything else. Take your eyes off all ministers, and all books, and all feelings, and even all believings; do not even fix your gaze on your own faith. You know that the eye cannot see itself. Did you ever see your own eye! In a looking-glass, perhaps, you may have done so; but that was only the reflection of it; and you may, in like manner, see the evidence of your faith, but you cannot look at the faith itself. Faith looks away from itself to the object of faith, even to Christ; and this is what the true witness desires. He will, if he can, keep men from looking anywhere but on his Master. Some look at their repentance; but if you cannot keep your eye on Christ, then away with your repentance. Some are always looking to their faith; but if there be a faith that hides Christ, away with it! Some want feelings, and right feelings we may wish to have; but as for those feelings which come between us and Christ, away with them, it is not fit that they should live. Our one business is to get men off from anything, and from everything, however good it is, that they may look alone to Christ Jesus, the Lamb of God.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Jim Leavenworth at 0 Comments Links to this post

Religulous - Coming Soon

This movie is supposed to come out later this year. It's a documentary with Bill Maher investigating religion. It seems the title combines the words 'religion' and 'rediculous'. I guess that's the whole message.

Based in this preview, it seems Bill is really out to make a mockery of religion. The preview suggests that religious people are crazy. Well some are. But it seems that Christianity also gets mocked. While that should come as no surprise, I'm afraid it may get mocked for the wrong reasons.

In any case, I can't judge this movie by it's cover, the preview, but it looks to be interesting. Will this be yet another mockery of religion? What kind of effect will it have on post-modern culture? Will it simply reinforce those who are against religion? Or will it also cause many others to doubt their faith and abandon it altogether?

This movie should be a good way to engage our culture and people around our daily lives in conversation about Christianity and the gospel. Let's pray that this movie will serve as providing opportunities to spread the gospel and contend for the faith.



Here is a video with Bill Maher debunking religion while not claiming
to not believe in God. This may be a sample of the flavor of his upcoming movie.



In this interview on Larry King which talks about the movie, Bill says he
does not believe in the Bible, whereas in the previous video he doesn't
say he does not believe in God.





Bookmark and Share
> posted by Jason McFadden at 2 Comments Links to this post

Monday, July 28, 2008

Slander Or Not?

Here's a question.

Slander. When does it occur?

For example, if I review something and say it is wrong, am I merely stating my opinion or fact?

Let's say that it is a fact, a truth, that it is wrong.

If I say that, for example, "The Shack" is erroneous or heretical, I am saying that the book is wrong, but what am I saying about the author, William P. Young, anything? Am I saying that the author is wrong?

If it's a fact that the book is wrong, then by implication, am I not saying that the author is wrong? Is this a valid inference?

If I say the author is wrong, is that slander?

And here's another question, if I say the author is wrong, am I saying that the author's beliefs and doctrine are wrong, or am I saying the he himself is wrong?

Is there a difference? If the fruit of the tree is bad, then isn't it because the tree is bad itself? Does bitter water come from a sweet fountain? (It shouldn't, but we fallen folks are quite duplicitous...)

The definition of slander is: the act or offense of saying something false or malicious that damages somebody's reputation.

If I say "The Shack" is wrong, then by inference or association am I not also saying that the author is wrong? If I am, then wouldn't that damage the author's reputation? It very well could (I'm not saying at all that my particular voice is of any volume or importance that it would effect such).

So if I am in some way damaging the author's reputation by saying he is wrong because his book is wrong, isn't that slander?

No.

Why not? It's only slander if what I say about the author or his book is FALSE. Read the definition again.

If I lie or say false things that damage someone's reputation, then that is slander.

That brings us back to the very first question from above! And that is, if I review something and say it is wrong, am I merely stating my opinion or fact?

If I say "The Shack" is wrong, is that a true statement of fact, or is it my opinion?

If it's true, then I am not committing slander against the author.

If it's just my opinion, then would my critique or review be slander? (It could be considered or thought to be slander, no doubt, especially by the author of the book, but would my review actually and factually be slander?)

What say you?
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Jason McFadden at 0 Comments Links to this post

The Shack - Is it Whack?




OK, "whack" is slang for heretical or stupefyingly erroneous.

The Shack is a fiction book by William P. Young. And as mentioned here before (go here), it's having a huge impact in Christendom. Also mentioned before and below, Tim Challies' review is most excellent.

Here is my personal response. From reading this book and the review by Tim Challies, I have learned a few things. 
 
First of all, I was affected by this book. At first, I found it to be not so bad. Sure, it had questionable moments and a couple obvious errors. But I had heard this kind of stuff before so it was no surprise. Also, I gave the author artistic license and kept in mind that the book was only fiction. But the real reason why I overlooked or just plain missed the heresy or the gravity of it was because the book got to me with it's emotional appeal.
 
The story right up to the point before the shack turned into a wonderland was not so bad I think. It became a real page tuner for me when things got bad on the camping trip for them. Later when Mack met God, I thought it got quite fantastical. Of course, I got to that part of the story thinking it was based on a true story and I believed it until this point!
 
The most appealing and attractive thing about this story was the idea of such a close, personal, intimate, and gracious relationship with God! This was very strong. This is what got my emotions going. It made me wonder at the grace of God and long for such a close personal relationship. In fact, one morning when I was about to leave for work I broke down crying at the thought, "I'm no masterful theologian, I just want a relationship with God!"
 
After the tears stopped I just felt undone. But I resumed my rational thinking and just figured the book made some bad points but overall its encouragement to have a closer relationship with God was worth it.
 
But the Tim Challies' review was a God-send for me. Here's some of the major things it helped me with:
 
1. It confirmed the subversion in the book that I also did sense while reading. Like trying to undermine scripture and theology and doctrine. I certainly took note of that, subtle as it may have been.
2. It clarified, or reminded me, of how my relationship with God works with the idea about mediation. As much as we'd like to see God face to face now and have such a close relationship, we can't, and we must rely on Jesus as our mediator.
3. It taught me that I am somewhat immature and need to grown in spiritual discernment! (I want to read Tim Challies' book on it.)
4. Though not so good in spiritual discernment, I was encouraged that even Tim said that this book was a bit harder to discern. He cited some factors that made sense regarding this.
5. It taught me how even though this was a fiction story, it certainly set out to teach doctrine about God! And it taught me just how erroneous the teaching really was!

So in a nutshell, the book's emotional appeal clouded my little discernment. Let this be a word of caution to those who read the book and a warning against allowing our emotional mind dictate what to believe rather than our rational mind.

And if you have not read Tim Challie's review yet, don't put it off any longer, read it!
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Jason McFadden at 2 Comments Links to this post

Sunday, July 27, 2008

IS BLOGGING ILLEGAL?

For the past few days I have been following a story but have not posted anything about it. Today I have to let people know what is going on. Imagine you create a blog and you use your blog to examine and if needed criticise things that are happening in Christianity. Someone gets upset and threatens legal action against the company that host your blog site. You are contacted and told your blog will be deleted unless you remove certain content. Sounds crazy? You are thinking that could not happen the United States which believes in the freedom of speech! I thought the same thing until yesterday, when a blog because they had offended someone was shut down.

Here is the story:

The following was found at the Slice of Ladoceia blog:

Poof! Apprising Ministries Online is Now Dark
Jul 26

In Ingrid’s absence, I am updating readers on the Richard Abanes/Apprising Ministries situation. As of 5pm Central Standard Time, the Apprising Ministries website that featured hundreds of important articles on current Christian issues was deleted. Richard Abanes, Harvest House author and chief apologist for Rick Warren and his Purpose-Driven global campaigns, accomplished this by filing a complaint with the legal department of IPower, Apprising’s web hosting service. Due to Richard’s claims of slander and libel regarding a 2005 article written by Apprising Ministries head, Ken Silva, the web hosting service,which does not check out any of these claims to see if there is any merit to them, gave Ken 48 hours to conform to Richard’s ideas of what should be on his website. The choice was this: take down your piece or lose your website. Ken correctly did not give in to this kind of threat and the site is now down.

The implications for all bloggers, religious or otherwise, are clear. Anyone who has a complaint about your views can claim that you have engaged in slander and the ISP Terms of Service usually allow for the companies to remove your website if you don’t take the material in question down. The First Amendment means nothing in these cases. Reportedly, a press release is about to go out to national media about this incident because it provides a clear precedent that has grave and clear implications for all who value the right to express their views online, regardless of the subject matter.

Everyone who values the right to read and publish blogs on the Internet has a vested interested in this. There will be more on all of this shortly.
You can read and comment regarding this at Richard Abanes’ blog.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Saturday, July 26, 2008

You Call This Worship?

The following was found at the, "A Little Leaven" blog.

One particularly poignant episode of South Park mocked the Christian music industry. In that episode the crass little creeps from South Park started a "Christian Band" by changing the lyrics to popular love songs. Every time the word 'baby' appeared in a song they replaced it with the word 'Jesus' and viola, the song was 'Christianized'.

Well, it appears that the makers of South Park knew what they were mocking. Here is video of what is passing for worship now a days. The "worship" leader is Rick Pino and the "praise song" being sung is a popular song from the 80's called You Spin Me Right Round and only one word was changed in order to Christianize it. (Ironically, the word 'baby' was changed to 'Jesus')

Here are my comments:

Before I post the video let me say this. If a christian wants to listen to the original version of the song that is fine. The song is not a christian song and it should not be used in worship. Taking your socks and spinning them around in the air is not worship! It is dumb, silly and just plain cheesy! If I was an unbeliever I would laugh at the utter stupidity of this and think how lame!

Watch for yourself what Christians are calling worship today:

Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 1 Comments Links to this post

Friday, July 25, 2008

Todd Bentley Now An Apostle

As of June 23 2008 people are now claiming that Todd Bentley is an apostle!

I will provide links to all the informaiton I can find as of right now and will try to post more later:

Apostle


Todd Bentleys Commissioning Lakeland Revival 6.23.08 - 1/4

Todd Bentley's Apostolic and Prophetic Commissioning 2/4

Todd Bentley's Apostolic and Prophetic Commissioning 3/4

Todd Bentleys Commissioning Lakeland Revival 6.23.08 - 4/4

Here is the link to the YouTube page that has many videos of this event:
Tube
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 1 Comments Links to this post

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Todd Bentley - NOT ONE CONFIRMED HEALING

Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Tuesday, July 22, 2008

Kent Hovind on the KJV: Reply Part 3

Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Kent Hovind on the KJV: Reply Part 2

Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Kent Hovind on the KJV: Reply Part 1

Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Monday, July 21, 2008

Ergun Caner vs. James White on Calvinism

This is the first episode of Radio Free Geneva that has been put on Youtube. The purpose of RFG is to dispel the many caricatures, straw men, and misrepresentations that those who are opposed to Reformed Theology (ie. Calvinism) normally make when critiquing the other side. Lord willing, there will be more in the future that deal with different subjects.

Ergun Caner delivered a sermon a few years ago called "Why I am Predestined Not to be a Hyper-Calvinist." However, many Reformed folk thought the sermon would have been more aptly titled "Why I am Not Predestined to Represent the Side I am Critiquing Accurately." In this episode of Radio Free Geneva, James White deals with the many straw men and mischaracterizations that Ergun Caner promoted during this sermon and rectifies them. This episode is especially helpful because many of the arguments Caner brought up are many of the same that are brought up regularly by opponents of the doctrines of grace.


Here is the link to where you can buy the mp3 of this program for $1.73:
http://www.aomin.org/catalog/product_...


Here are links to where you can find out more information about how the debate that was supposed to be didn't occur. Start with 10/6/06 "Regarding the Lynchburg Situation" and work your way up.:
http://www.aomin.org/aoblog/index.php...


Here is some written correspondance between Ergun Caner and James White:
http://vintage.aomin.org/ErgunCaner1....



Tom Ascol, who was going to be James White's debate partner in this debate commented on it on Founder's Blog, as well:
http://www.founders.org/blog/2006/05/...


http://www.founders.org/blog/2006/06/...



Here, Ascol comments on the sermon presented in this edition of RFG.:
http://www.founders.org/blog/2006/06/...


Finally, here's a link that discusses logical fallacies. I figured it would be very helpful considering the nature of this video.:
http://www.logicalfallacies.info/


The Alpha and Omega graphics used in this video were made by Micah Burke (klockheed on Youtube). Great job, Micah!

http://www.aomin.org



http://www.lanechaplin.com










Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Saturday, July 19, 2008

The Dark Knight
















Unless you are living on Mars you know that the new Batman movie is in theaters. People are lining up to see this movie in amazing numbers:

LOS ANGELES -

Batman's joust with the Joker has set another box office record. Stoked by fan fever over the manic performance of the late Heath Ledger as the Joker, "The Dark Knight" set a one-day box office record with $66.4 million on opening day, Warner Bros. head of distribution Dan Fellman said Saturday. Here is the link to the entire report: Batman


$66.4 million in one day! That is unbelievable!


Should a Christian see this movie?

That is a good question but honestly most Christians don't care what is in a movie,they are going to see what they want. They may scream and condemn any music that has a beat but they are going to watch their TV shows and their movies. For the Christians that are concerned with the content of a movie let me see if I can provide any information that may help you decide what to do.

The Dark Knight is rated PG-13 for intense sequences of violence and some menace.

The Christan sites that offer reviews are usually not very accurate. For example, when Batman begins came to theaters a few years ago, I read reviews that said there was no obscenity used in the movie. I went to see the movie and ended up counting something like 30 obscenities.

When Iron Man hit the theaters I read a review on a Christian site that stated, "there is nothing in this movie that would offend the most conservative church goer." Before the movie was over I had heard 14 obscenities.


We have learned that it is really hard to determine if a movie is appropriate or not.


From Christian Answers:

Whether you are an avid fan of the Batman franchise, a casual summer moviegoer , or someone curious about the performance of a young actor gone far too soon, rest assured, you will not leave the theater disappointed. You will, however, likely leave the theater mesmerized by a film, and a performance, that will be talked about for a very long time to come.

The content of 'The Dark Knight' is far darker than the already bleak 'Batman Begins', and Christian parents should use caution in whether or not to allow children or younger, impressionable teenagers to see the film. The violence is heavy handed, and far more ruthless than in the original. Frankly, The Joker makes The Scarecrow from 'Batman Begins' look like a Saturday morning amateur. The Joker maims and kills without remorse, and one of the very first scenes features a 'disappearing pencil' trick that is stunning in its quick brutality. The mood is dreary, which we expect from Batman movies, but Harvey Dent explains to us 'It's always darkest before the dawn.' Well, the rising sun is still a long way off for Gotham, and caution is urged for parents wondering whether to expose their children to that darkness. There is very little profanity in the film, much less than the first film, and practically no sexual content (some women are seen lounging in their bathing suits on Bruce's boat, but the camera is on them for a minuscule amount of time), but the violence more than makes up for what other content is left out.


The film hits on all sorts of different spiritual topics, and I could probably write a dissertation on them all. I won't get in to everything here, for the simple fact that doing so will reveal specific plot twists and developments that I don't intend to spoil. Suffice it to say, themes of sacrifice, redemption, fear, selfishness, revenge, and the basic sinfulness of man all present themselves in the film, along with a various host of other. Characters are forced to choose who lives and dies, while others are forced to decide whether to continue fighting evil when it seems like nothing will work, or simply giving in and joining the forces of evil. Each character has their own world cave in around them, and each must persevere, or be sucked into the maelstrom.


You can read the entire review at this link:
Batman

This is going to be a movie that your teenager will want to see. They will not be able to escape the hype and the fact that teenagers everywhere are going to be talking about the film.

My 13 year old daughter who loves acting wants to see the performance of
Heath Ledger as the joker. So at this time I am thinking about going to see the movie with my daughter this evening. We will probably be attending the 6:00pm showing at the Century Theater in Abilene, TX.

The rule in my home is very simple. No matter what we watch, TV show or a movie, we discuss the philosophy and message when it is done.
This forces them to think and confront the philosophy they are viewing. It also allows for good discussion and time well spent with my children.

If we do attend the movie I will post a review as soon as I can.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 2 Comments Links to this post

"That's Entertainment!"

Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 1 Comments Links to this post

BEWARE OF THE SHACK

Yesterday I told everyone about the book, The Shack. After I completed the post I begin to contact certain ministries and let them know about the book as well. David Cloud of Way Of Life Ministries told me that he warned everyone on 9 May 2008! Wow, he has to be the first to begin warning people. He did a great job on being so fast to learn about this and to warn people.

Here is what he posted on the Way of Life Literature site:

BEWARE OF THE SHACK (Friday Church News Notes, May 9, 2008, www.wayoflife.org fbns@wayoflife.org, 866-295-4143) -

The following is excerpted from “The Shack:

Father-goddess Rising,” Lighthouse Trails Research, April 23, 2008: “Many are crediting The Shack, the novel by William P. Young, with revolutionizing their faith. With themes of overcoming loss, working through anger, and restored relationship between man and God, Young’s novel has excited many within the Body of Christ. Young has appeared on CBN, and has garnered fans across the country. The Shack, continues to sell briskly. Yet, in the midst of such enthusiasm, does The Shack glorify Jesus Christ--or contradict the Bible with a false image of the Lord our God? The novel’s main character, Mack Philips, has lost his daughter. She has been murdered, her bloodied dress found in an isolated shack. Four years later Mack receives an invitation from God to spend time with the Trinity in the very shack where the dress was found. Nowhere in the Bible do Father, Son, and Holy Spirit simultaneously assume physical forms on earth. The Shack, however, portrays Jesus as a carpenter, the Holy Spirit as an Asian woman, and God the Father as a large black woman named ... Papa. ... At one point the book’s version of Jesus praises the fictional Father-goddess, exclaiming, ‘Isn’t she great?’ In the entire Bible there is not one single reference to Father, Son, or Holy Spirit--or to any of His angels--as female. ... There is an apparent dismissal of the importance of Scripture, which is reflected in slippery theology found throughout the novel. Young writes, ‘Nobody wanted God in a box, just in a book. Especially an expensive one bound in leather with gilt edges, or was that guilt edges?’ ... The Father-goddess of The Shack, it seems, is never about guilt or punishment. She benignly informs Mack, ‘I don’t need to punish people for sin.’ ... An excellent writer, Young plays to emotion and touches on legitimate hurts and concerns. The author excels at imbuing his deity with attributes of love, forgiveness, and mercy, and this is what many people have responded to. Increasingly in novels and movies the Lord is blithely used as one of the characters and given words from the mouth of man.”


I have asked Jason and Jim to read the book and post their reviews as soon as they are done. Keep checking back for more information on this subject.

Have a great Saturday.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 1 Comments Links to this post

Friday, July 18, 2008

TODD BENTLEY

"Claims of revival must always be made in the light of Scripture so that we can determine whether this is a true movement of the Holy Spirit that points to Christ, or if it's a counterfeit."


Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

The Shack
















Have you heard of the book, "The Shack?"


If you have not you need to take some time to make yourself familiar with it.


In the world of publishing, some of the hottest real estate is The Shack, an unheralded novel from an unknown publisher that may have sold more than 1 million copies.


Described as "a guy-meets-God story," The Shack has rivaled the appeal of the first Left Behind novels - and it has spread largely on word of mouth from fans.

For the week of July 6, The Shack is No. 1 on The New York Times' trade paperback best-seller list, holding the top spot for the fifth week in a row.

Many bookstores, according to the Times, report receiving bulk orders.
Those sales are especially amazing, book sellers report, because The Shack was released last year with almost no publicity or advertising.


Instead of a New York publisher, the novel by William P. Young was released by Windblown Media, a small company founded by two California ministers for the expressed purpose of getting The Shack to the public.


You can read the entire news report at this link:
Shack



The book is being sold on Christianbook.com



So of course this book has to be a great book for everyone to read and of course is biblical in it's theology! Well, not so much!


The following was found at this link: Truth

The Shack is being advertised as THE book that will help you "see God as you never seen him before". (that's an understatement!)





In The Shack 'god' the father is an African American WOMAN called Papa (a goddess!), 'god' the son is a plain looking Middle Eastern man with a big nose and 'god' the spirit is a small, delicate little Asian girl (another goddess!). The Shack also teaches the heresy of modalism and is chock full of other serious doctrinal errors.

Sadly, Christians are buying this book in droves and claiming that it's changed their lives or opened their mind to new ideas about God. But, this book teaches false doctrine, false theology and a false triune godhead and the author has publicly rejected the doctrine of Sola Scriptura.


This is not the one True God of the Bible and Christians should not read this book in their quest for finding spiritual truths because the false teaching is so bad and so dangerous that this book can only be classified as 'spiritual poison'.

Heed the warnings of scripture.
2Th. 2:9 The coming of the lawless one is by the activity of Satan with all power and false signs and wonders, 10 and with all wicked deception for those who are perishing, because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. 11 Therefore God sends them a strong delusion, so that they may believe what is false, 12 in order that all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness.


Tim Challies Review of The Shack











more to come...
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 1 Comments Links to this post

Satan's Devices : Accusation

Is it possible that the accuser of the brethren likes to point ALL of your sins at once and often to get you to see that you fall very short of being holy and perfect as a Christian is called to be so that you will be led to doubt your salvation, the very salvation of God? (Revelation 12:10)

 

But my salvation does not come from me, it comes from God! It’s based on God’s mercy, love, and grace, not what I do or don’t do! Restore unto me the joy of YOUR salvation! (Psalm 51:12)

 

So why keep looking at myself rather than looking to the author and finisher of my faith? (Hebrews 12:2) Did I author my faith? No. Will I finish it? I will endure unto the end and persevere…because God preserves me and finishes and completes that good work which he started in me! (Philippians 1:6)

 

But, the subtle reply is that if you were saved you would be and do all the things that you know you’re supposed to be and do but you either don’t them right or you don't do them at all. So you can’t be saved, see? And the things you should not do at all, you sometimes do. This sounds like Romans 7, and we'd be right to lament like Paul did over our wretchedness, but only for a brief time. We know who will deliver us! (Romans 7:24-25)

 

"You convinced yet you so-called Christian?", comes the sneer. "The New Testament, which I know right well, says you must be like Jesus, and look at the sin still in you, and you know it. You are not saved. Give it up. Eat drink and be merry while you still can. Your future is not but eternal torment."

 

Hold up! I don’t think so! First of all, no Christian will ever be and do all they’re supposed to, either right or at all! Not on this earth in this body of flesh, this body of death. So of course that’s my case. You accuse correctly, for I am indeed not without sin. But they are forgiven, and it's by Christ's righteousness, not my own, that God justifies me. For Christ was in this world and tempted, and he alone was found without sin! (Hebrews 4:15) If not being perfect yet means I'm not saved after all, then no Christian would ever be saved! And that’s not so.

 

Furthermore, while I know I must work to improve ALL these areas of sin in my life as rightly accused of, as I work out my own salvation with fear and trembling, is it God’s plan or will to have me work on all of them at the same time or rather to take each area of sin one at a time to grow out of? And either way, does God expect instant growth and perfection? Isn’t growing in the grace and knowledge of Jesus a process over time? That's part of sanctification. I plead the blood of Christ in my defense. He washed my sins away.

 

Let us not be ignorant of Satan’s devices! (2 Corinthians 2:11) He would have us think that were so bad still that we can’t possibly be saved. We are bad. But our accuser is so-bad. “Misery loves company” holds true, it seems, even for non-humans. Salvation is not about who's bad but about who's good, and that is the only one who is good, God the Father.

 

I have written this to try to remind us sheep about our struggle with the enemy as being real and to expose his subtle whispers which can be like a voice in the back of our head. I do not believe in living scared of the devil, but we do have an adversary who desired to sift Peter like wheat and would have were it not for Christ's merciful intercession (Luke 22:31). And Satan goes about as a roaring lion seeking whom he may devour (1 Peter 5:8). Don't listen to his lies! We must be sober and vigilant.

 

Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you. (James 4:7)

 

Fight the good fight of faith today Christian! (1 Tim 6:12) We are more than conquerors through Christ! (Romans 8:37) Through Christ who strengthens us, we can do all things. (Philippians 4:13).

Bookmark and Share
> posted by Jason McFadden at 0 Comments Links to this post

Thursday, July 17, 2008

PENTECOSTAL EVANGELIST’S HEALINGS NOT VERIFIABLE

The following was found at the Way Of Life Literature website:

PENTECOSTAL EVANGELIST’S HEALINGS NOT VERIFIABLE
(Friday Church News Notes, July 18, 2008, www.wayoflife.org fbns@wayoflife.org, 866-295-4143) -

Todd Bentley, who is at the head of a Pentecostal healing “revival” in Lakeland, Florida, claims that multitudes have been healed and some raised from the dead. He slams people on the forehead, shoves them, and has even kicked an elderly lady in the face and banged a crippled woman’s legs on the platform. “Holy laughter,” spiritual drunkenness, violent shaking, and “falling under the power” are an integral part of the “revival.” The meeting has a sideshow feel with raucous music blaring and Bentley, who is covered with tattoos, crying out, “Come and get some,” and “[Miracles are] popping like popcorn.” He claims to know what is happening in the audience, calling out things like, “Someone’s getting a new spinal cord tonight.” The crusade began in April at Ignite Church and the crowds keep coming. Bentley’s healing claims have been spectacular, with one man even saying he can now see out of a glass eye. The Associated Press tried to follow up on a list of 15 names that were given by Bentley’s ministry that is supposed to represent healings that can be medically verified. “Yet two phone numbers given out by the ministry were wrong, six people did not return telephone messages and only two of the remainder, when reached by The Associated Press, said they had medical records as proof of their miracle cure. However, one woman would not make her physician available to confirm the findings, and the other’s doctor did not return calls despite the patient’s authorization” (“Controversial Revivals Draw Even Pentecostal Critics,” Christian Post, July 13, 2008).

It seems to me that the ability to see out of a glass eye could be easily verified. Bentley could send the guy for an eye examination, and that would be that, but don’t hold your breath. Bentley claims to be following in the footsteps of the apostles and exhibiting “kingdom power,” but he is doing no such thing. The apostles did not conduct healing meetings. They didn’t call out psychic healings. They didn’t shake and laugh hysterically and stagger around like drunks and flop around on the floor. We believe in divine healing for today, but we don’t believe in Pentecostal showmen (see “I Believe in Miracles” http://www.wayoflife.org/fbns/ibelievein-miracles.html).

The devil is just as much in the business of religion today as God, and the only way we can discern the difference is by comparing all teaching and practice to the Bible. In The Pentecostal-Charismatic Movements: The History and the Error, we document the phoniness that has characterized the ministries of Kathryn Kuhlman, Aimee Semple McPherson, William Branham, A.A. Allen, Jack Coe, Oral Roberts, Derek Prince, Charles Price, John Wimber, Charles and Frances Hunter, Benny Hinn, and many others.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 1 Comments Links to this post

Charismatic Inconsistency

Everyday I find myself becoming more and more fed up with the Charismatic movement and all that it teaches. Charismatic leaders and teachers can say anything and make all kinds of claims and it seems that no one in the movement will hold them accountable. Today I came across two things that I want people to take the time to consider:

First, let's look at some Charismatic teaching:

From the Assemblies of God web-site:

WE BELIEVE...Divine Healing of the Sick is a Privilege for Christians Today and is provided for in Christ's atonement (His sacrificial death on the cross for our sins). [1 of 4 cardinal doctrines of the A/G]
Here is the link to the statement: Healing


The Charismatic teaching on this is very clear. Jesus did not only provide spiritual healing on the cross but also physical healing for Christians now. That means if a christian is sick or hurt they can be healed now!


Now let's Look at some claims made by Charismatics:

Charismatics claim that people are being raised from the dead today!

Consider this video from Todd Bentley





Now while these claims are bing made, the following news was reported. This was found on the Charisma Magazine website:

The news of a car crash that left the Rev. Timothy Wright critically injured and claimed the lives of his wife and grandson has sparked a nationwide prayer vigil for the famed gospel singer and Pentecostal pastor. Here is the link to the orignal story:


Ok charismatics, raise them from the dead! Healing is a guarantee according to your doctrine. Heal the pastor from all of his injuries! I am waiting ... do it! Come on, stop talking and making all kinds of wild claims and actually do it!
The wife and grandson of this pastor are still dead! Come on what's wrong? You guys don't have enough faith? Ohh I know what's wrong, the Rev. Wright doesn't have enough faith! So I am sure you charismatics are writing him very nice letters letting him know that if he would just believe his wife would be raised and he would be healed! It can't be God's fault. I mean he dies on the cross to guarantee healing according to your doctrine, so whose fault is it?

Yes, I am sick of the charismatic lies and false teaching!
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 1 Comments Links to this post

Sermon Review

Part 1




Part 2

Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Thursday Thoughts

Good morning everyone,

Many of you have read articles by Jason Mcfadden and Jim Leavenworth but have never heard them teach or preach. Now you have your chance, Last Sunday Jason taught from the puritan catechism on the subject, Christ as Prophet. You can listen to his message at this link:


Jim Leavenworth preached a message on Hebrews 6 and how many use this section of scripture to prove a person can loose their salvation. You can listen to his message at this link:

I preached Sunday evening on what God's Word Accomplishes. You may be surprised to find out some of the things God's Word brings about.
You can listen to my message at this link:


On the Music with a Message blog I posted information on a great new artist named, Brook Fraser. Consider the following lyrics:

If I find in myself desires nothing in this world can satisfy
I can only conclude that I was not made for here
If the flesh that I fight is at best only light and momentary
Then of course I’ll feel nude when to where I’m destined I’m compared

CHORUS
Speak to me in the light of the dawn
Mercy comes with the morning
I will sigh and with all creation groan
As I wait for hope to come for me
Am I lost or just less found,On the straight or on the round
about of the wrong way?
Is this a soul that stirs in me,Is it breaking free, wanting to come alive?
‘Cause my comfort would prefer for me to be numb
And avoid the impending birth
Of who I was born to become

CHORUS

Bridge
For we, we are not long here
Our time is but a breath
So we better breathe it
And I, I was made to live
I was made to love
I was made to know you

Hope is coming for me

You can check out more information about this amazing new artist at this link:


Have a great day.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Where's The Bread?

It was well after the normal time for lunch recently when I got a bag of Reece’s Pieces at my local grocer. Being after lunch and not having yet ate lunch placed a hunger gnaw in my belly. So when I began to eat those Reece’s Pieces, I couldn’t help but notice they were extremely good, much better tasting and satisfying than normal! The greater the hunger, the greater even not-good things tend to taste good. Se were they really good, being candy?

This is a good illustration. Similar to the God-shaped vacuum we have, as Pascal taught, and similar to the universal desire to worship, as indicated by Paul in Romans 1, we all have a voracious appetite for…that which is good! (Warning: The world markets to our insatiable ravening, er eh, lust of the flesh and eyes.)

What’s more good than God?

When it comes to physical hunger, the greater our hunger, the greater our satisfaction from eating. There are even cases in which people are so hungry or starving that they’ll eat just about anything, even dirt, literally.

What about spiritual hunger? The question is, how hungry are we for spiritual things as alluded to above? Ecclesiastes tells us God has put eternity into man’s heart (Ecc 3:11). Can anything temporal then ever satisfy our heart, like money, drugs, & sex?

The answer is no. So why does the world, and our own old man nature, tend to turn to such things so much? There are multiple answers, but the point is that the world’s turning to temporal things to try to satisfy the eternal desires of the heart demonstrates the great voracity of their hunger!

The world is so hungry that they’ll live on candy like fornication (an imitation of the sweetness of God ordained in the expression of physical, emotional, and spiritual intimacy between a married husband and wife). The world’s gotta have something to eat! They gotta have something to worship!

It’s a starving world out there, and they’re no just “out there”, they’re right here with us, next to us.

We who feed on the living bread of life, the word of God, Jesus, eating his flesh and drinking his blood, enjoying his word that’s sweeter than cokes and cakes and candies, must be like one beggar telling another beggar where to find the bread!

John Piper has said, “Missions exists because worship doesn’t.” He’s talking about correct worship of God. Everyone worships something, but the world worships idols rather than God (Romans 1).

Pray the Lord of the harvest will cause us to take up sickles and reap the wheat, the starving world. May God lead us to his lost sheep and let us show them the great shepherd and bishop of souls.

Bookmark and Share
> posted by Jason McFadden at 0 Comments Links to this post

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Brokeback Auto?















Do you remember the movie Brokeback Mountain?

Brokeback Mountain is a 2005 romantic-drama film that depicts the complex romantic and sexual relationship between two men in the American West from 1963 to 1983.

The American Car blog has recently posted the article, "Brokeback Auto" which is about how GM is having many financial problems however, they seem to have money to support the homosexual movement. Take the time to check out the article at this link:

American Car


Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Distracted
















As Christians we strive to study God's word, spend time in prayer, and seek to serve and help others. At the same time, we live in a world that offers so many distractions that at times we find ourselves focused on everything else but God and His word. These distractions are now affecting the church. Many pastors include movie clips to be shown to the congregation during the sermon. The argument is that this will help the people understand God's word. It seems to me to simply prove the fact that we are so distracted with movies and TV that we cannot even sit through a sermon without seeing a clip from a movie or TV show. Many churches even cancel services for the Superbowl! Think back a few years and remember how things were:

There was a time when you had 3 channels on the TV and they all went off the air around midnight! You did not have a DVR or a VCR so you had to watch what was on when it was on. There were times when there was nothing on TV that you wanted to watch. Time marched on and it was not long until most people had Cable TV. You now had 40-50 channels to choose from and they were on 24 hours a day! Then the VCR was introduced and nothing would ever be the same. You could record TV shows if you were going to be gone so you could watch them later. You could go to the local video store and choose from hundreds of movies to rent. Today we have DVDs and hundreds of channels to choose from.


Today the average adult male watches 29 hours per week, and the adult female watches 34 hours per week of TV.

There are no statistics that clearly prove Christians watch less!

Everyone needs to understand that things are not going to get any better. In fact, a new invention is about to make it worse!











The little box above does not seem that much of a threat but wait until you find out what this thing can do!


Consider:
Over 10,000 movies & TV episodes
No advertisements or trailers to sit through
Movies start in as little as 30 seconds
Fast-forward, rewind and pause or watch again and again
Near DVD picture quality


That little box hooks to your TV and gives you access to over 10,,000 movies and TV shows immediately! You browse find what you want to watch and click a button and it begins! The box only cost $99.00












You can read all about at this link:
TV

How are you doing with the distraction of this life?

How is your family doing?

Have you ever stopped and actually considered how much time you are spending on certain activities?

How much time do you actually spend with the things of God?

Things are not going to get easier. In fact, as technology continues to develop, we are going to have more things available!

As Christians we may have to make some difficult choices to get rid of some things.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Spiritual Depression















Many people experience times of depression even Christians, and many struggle with it for years. Grace Baptist Church is currently doing a series on Spiritual Depression. I strongly recommend the series:

Spiritual Depression 1: The Basics

Spiritual Depression #2: False Guilt

Spiritual Depression #3: Guilt

Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 1 Comments Links to this post

Let Scripture Steep & To Your Spirit Reap.

(Galatians 6:7-9)

Hot Tea gets greater flavor and impact the longer the tea bag steeps in the hot water. Likewise, to get the greatest out of God’s word, we need to let his word steep in our minds and hearts each day. The biblical way to steep is meditate day and night and pray without ceasing. (Psalm 1:2, 1 Thess 5:17)

Like steaming hot water soaking the tea bag, we must let our minds permeate God’s word as we study the whole of scripture, and then let the word permeate our hearts as we soak up God’s word, thereby saturating our lives for God’s glory. (Psalm 119:11)

The longer the tea bag steeps, the greater the wafting aroma of the tea for others around to notice. Likewise, the longer we let God’s word steep in our minds and hearts, the more people around us will notice the aroma of Christ in our lives as we gently live out his word being carried along by and walking in the Spirit. (2 Corinthians 2:15)

Hot Tea brings warmth and nourishing antioxidants to the one who drinks it. Likewise, if we let God’s word dwell in us richly in all wisdom, we will be able to teach and admonish others, bringing them the warmth of God’s love and the nourishment of his word, like a powerful antioxidant, to fight the corruption of the flesh brought by sin. (Colossians 3:16)

Bookmark and Share
> posted by Jason McFadden at 0 Comments Links to this post

Monday, July 14, 2008

Ancient Heresies in the Modern Church

I recommend a lot of sermons for people to listen to, and I realize that most of the time people who read this blog never take the time to do so.
Today however, I want to recommend two sermons and challenge people to actually take the time to listen.

Grace Reformed Baptist Church in Porter, TX is having their 2008 John Bunyan Conference . From that conference I want to recommend two sermons:

Ancient Heresies in the Modern Church, Part 1

Ancient Heresies in the Modern Church, Part 2
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Sweet, Sweet, Sweet!!!



OK, what’s sweeter than honey and the honeycomb? God’s word! Psalm 119:103, Psalm 19:10.

We ‘know’ honey is sweet, so it’s a good illustration. But do you actually like honey?

In order to really take it home, just replace honey with your most favorite sweets and think of how you really like them. For example, with me, there’s sugary fluffy cotton candy and creamy rich eggnog and crunchy sweet, silky smooth Crème Brulee! I know for someone else it’s…AM Donuts! Then simply think, “God’s word is sweeter than that!”

But when you do, you may notice that you don’t actually find yourself exclaiming God’s word is THAT sweet. Does it ever feel like homework or a chore to study God’s word, or even just to read it and soak it in? One of the first ways to battle our neglect for the word and our lack of diligent study of it is to replace our feelings or thoughts that it’s a chore or a bore to read it. So we have to start with right thinking. But guess where right thinking comes from, God’s word!

Next time you may find yourself with some illegitimate excuse to not study God’s word, especially if you find yourself thinking it’s a chore or a bore, think about those Psalms. Think to yourself, “God’s word really IS sweeter than honey. That’s some sweet stuff. Seriously, I should look into it, try it out, go over it, take it in…” And with that, pray and ask God to increase your hunger for His word! And ask him for help to put away less sweet treats.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Jason McFadden at 0 Comments Links to this post

Scripture Readings

Here are the scripture readings for today:

Isaiah 1:10-17
Psalm 50:8-9, 16-17, 21, 23
Matthew 10:34- 11:1

Related Sermons:

Unacceptable Worship: Isaiah 1:1-15

Loyalty To Christ Above All Else: Matthew 10:34-39

Psalm 50
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

'World's oldest blogger' dies in Australia

The following is from Yahoo News:

SYDNEY (AFP) -
An Australian woman described as the world's oldest Internet blogger has died at the age of 108 after posting a final message about singing "a happy song" in her nursing home.

Olive Riley "passed away peacefully on July 12 and will be mourned by thousands of Internet friends and hundreds of descendants and other relatives," a note on her website said.

Riley had posted more than 70 entries on her blog from Woy Woy on the east coast since February last year, sharing her thoughts on modern life and her experiences living through the entire 20th century.

Born in the outback town of Broken Hill on October 20 1899, she lived through two world wars and raised three children while doing various jobs, including ranch cook and barmaid.

In her final post on June 26, she wrote: "I can't believe I've been here in this nursing home for more than a week.

"How the days have flown, even though I've been in bed most of the time. I still feel weak, and can't shake off that bad cough.

"Penny, who's in the next bed to mine, had a visit one day this week from her daughter, who's a professional singer. Guess what happened! She and I sang a happy song, as I do every day, and before long we were joined by several nurses, who sang along too. It was quite a concert!"

Riley's blog, initially on http://www.allaboutolive.com.au and more recently at http://worldsoldestblogger.blogspot.com/, was "mind-blowing to her," her great grandson Darren Stone said.

"She had people communicating with her from as far away as Russia and America on a continual basis, not just once in a while," he told the national AAP news agency.

"She enjoyed the notoriety -- it kept her mind fresh."


When I read that story I thought wow, I hope if I live to be 108 I am still blogging and still seeking to use the Internet and other technologies to share God's truth. If someome who is 108 can blog then so can you!
I had one last thought, what will by my final post?
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Sunday, July 13, 2008

TULIP











A tulip is a beautiful flower and it is an acronym used to describe a very important system of theology:

TULIP is an acronym used to remember the "Five Points of Calvinism," which is specifically related to soteriology, or the doctrine of salvation.
While the theological school of Calvinism is broader than the points of TULIP, it is commonly associated with its distinctives. The five points of TULIP are often referred to as the Calvinistic "Doctrines of Grace."
Source: Theopedia


The Five Points of Calvinism in acrostic form
T - Total depravity
U - Unconditional election
L - Limited atonement
I - Irresistible grace
P - Perseverance of the saints

Here is a series of audio messages on each point:

Tulip-Total Depravity

Tulip-A Study Of Election

TULIP-A Study Of Limited Atonement

TULIP: A Study Of Irresistable Grace

TULIP - Perseverance Of The Saints


No matter your theological perspective it would be wise to actually take the time to study these very important issues.

Have a great day.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Saturday, July 12, 2008

On the Incarnation - by Athanasius
















Ask most Christians who Athanasius was and most people will give you a blank stare as if they have no idea what you are talking about. This is because sadly most churches don't bother to teach any church history. I have taught on Athanasius a number of times at my church so I was glad to discover the book, St. Athanasius- On The Incarnation.

I found a review of the book and would like to share some of it here:


On the Incarnation - by Athanasius
Book Review by Tom Wood


A mere 71 pages in length (approachable for non-readers and
readers alike), On the Incarnation of the Word of God is worth going
through slowly, pencil in hand.



Interestingly, this book was written by Athanasius before either the Arian
heresy or the Council of Nicea were
even heard of. The fact that it is such a
clear articulation of the divinity of Christ
and His pre-eminence as the creator of
all things speaks to the importance of
being saturated with Biblical thinking
before storms arise.

I would like to add my comment at this point: Anyone who has studied Church history and understands how many people twist church history to teach or deny truth will understand why that point is so important!

You can read the entire review at this link:
Incarnation


If you would like to order the book follow this link:
Book

As always feel free to purchase me a copy of the book as well :)


Have a great Saturday.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Friday, July 11, 2008

Ordo Salutis -- The Order of Salvation of God

I just came across a sermon series that I think everyone should take the time to listen to:

Ordo Salutis -- Understanding the Order of Salvation of God
Part 1

Part 2

Part 3
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Adventures of a Bi-Vocational Pastor
















It is almost 4 pm in the afternoon on Friday. I should be getting ready to go home from work and start studying for my sermons for Sunday, but this weekend is going to be different.

I had to wake up at 7:00 am today and go to work. I got home sometime after 10am. I was told that I needed to come back at 11:00pm tonight to work. I came home and tried to get some sleep. The phone rang and I was then told that I need to report at 3:00am! So at this point I have no idea when I should try to go to sleep. There is some good news to report. This Sunday I will have some help. Jason McFadden one of the Preaching Today team members will teach during the bible study hour. He will be teaching from the Puritan Catechism. Jim Leavenworth, also a preaching today team member will be preaching during the morning worship service. He has to work all night Saturday so it is not going to be easy for him either. He will be preaching from Hebrews 6. I will be preaching the evening service. In times past when I had to work some crazy shift like this I taught and preached for every service. Having men who are qualified and trained to teach and preach is a great blessing! I will go to work at 3:00 am and I am not sure when I will go home. I will return to work Saturday night at 11:00pm and work until Sunday Morning at 7:00am. Preparing to preach is going to be difficult but I should be able to accomplish it. Please pray for all of us as we prepare to teach and preach Sunday. Teaching God's word is a great responsibility and it must be done carefully and we must ensure the text is taught correctly. I may post some thoughts through out tonight so people will know how things are going.


Here are the scripture readings for Sunday


Isaiah 55:10-11
Psalm 65:10-14
Romans 8:18-23
Matthew 13:1-23


Have a great weekend.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Thursday, July 10, 2008

Polycarp















Yesterday, the devotional my church uses mentioned Polycarp. In the devotional we read,
"Polycarp was a personal friend of the apostle John, and as a young man he had been discipled by the apostle."

I thought I would take some time tonight to point people to more information bout Polycarp.


Saint Polycarp of Smyrna (ca. 69 – ca. 155) was a second century bishop of Smyrna. He died a martyr when he was stabbed after an attempt to burn him at the stake failed. Polycarp is recognized as a saint in the Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Anglican, and Lutheran churches.
Source:Wikipedia


Our chief sources of information concerning St. Polycarp are: (1) the Epistles of St. Ignatius; (2) St. Polycarp's own Epistle to the Philippians; (3) sundry passages in St. Irenæus; (4) the Letter of the Smyrnaeans recounting the martyrdom of St. Polycarp.
Source: The Catholic Encyclopedia



Here is the link to the excellent article on Polycarp found at Theopedia.com
Polycarp



If you would like to read Polycarp's letter to the Philippians you can do so at this link:
Philippians
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

The Gospel According to Pelagius

The White Horse Inn is one of the best programs on radio or on the Internet. I listen to every week thanks to my I-Pod and pod casting. This past week they did a great program on Pelagianism! I believe pelagianism is a heresy that is present in Churches all across America and the sad thing is most Christians have no idea what it is!

I challenge everyone to take the time ti listen to this very important program.

Here are the details:

The Gospel According to Pelagius
Who was Pelagius and what did he teach about sin, grace and the gospel? Why have his views stayed with us through the centuries? On this edition of the White Horse Inn the hosts will discuss the history and influence of Pelagianism, as they continue their series Christless Christianity.


Here is the link to the program:
White horse Inn


RELATED ARTICLES
Pelagianism, by Michael Horton
The Gospel According to Pelagius, by Gerald Bray


RECOMMENDED BOOKS
Anti-Pelgagian Writings, by St. Augustine
Putting Amazing Back Into Grace, by Michael Horton
The Holiness of God, by R.C. Sproul
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Dog Hungry

My dog is a ravenous bottomless pit. She acts likes she's starving even when it's not close to feeding time. When it is close to time, she lets you know. She will stand at attention, or simply sit near you, and stare you down. If you move, she'll jump up at the ready to woof down some grub.

So she's close to me and staring me down. I am, "The Feeder."

So it kinda got me thinking about my own hungering for God's word. Do I starve for it during the day? Do I get close to God in prayer and beg for food from His word, staring him down, looking to him??

Do you?

Doesn't the Psalms say that God's word is more desirable than lots of fine gold? And that we should long for it like a baby longs for milk? My 6 week old baby will scream and cry for a LONG time unti lyou feed him. What a picture! Actually, what a sound, that crying! Makes my nerves frazzle. That's some powerful desiring! Do we disire God's word the same?

There's something else about my dog that may be a good picture.

Warning: Disgusting details...

My dog, whether she's been fed or not, has a nasty habit of eating her own dung in the back yard!

What about us? Do we feed on the junk of this world rather than God's word? Do we turn to our own vomit as a dog?

Let us as dogs eat the crumbs from the master's table!

Let's pray as a church that God will make us more hungry for the living bread and thirsty for the living water of Jesus Christ our Lord! To him be the glory!
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Jason McFadden at 0 Comments Links to this post

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

Scripture Readings For The Day

Here are the scripture readings for today. Many times the readings have a common theme or they are connected in some way. See if you can find a connection between the readings for today.

Hosea 10:1-3, 7-8, 12
Psalm 105:2-7
Matthew 10:1-7
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Tuesday, July 8, 2008

Joel Hemphill Denies the Deity of Christ and the Trinity

I just saw the following post on Dr. James White's blog and thought everyone should read it:

Though I have never been much of a "fan" of the music of the Hemphills, I am aware of the name and their influence in "Christian music." Joel Hemphill was inducted into the Southern Gospel Music Hall of Fame last year; the Hemphills as a family have recorded 27 albums and received eight Dove Awards. To say they are well known "down South" is an understatement.

But Joel Hemphill stands firmly with...the Muslims in his denial of the deity of Christ and the Trinity. He has even put his Arianism in print here. Read a few of the linked articles and you will find the very same arguments you hear at your front door on a Saturday morning, or down at the mosque, being repeated by an 8-time Dove Award winner. And what's more, they are still singing in ostensibly "Trinitarian" churches, as seen here. Just like Phillips, Craig and Dean, likewise non-Trinitarian in their theology, continue to sing in Trinitarian churches (even a Baptist church next month, August 18th), the Hemphills, simply due to their name recognition, have access to Christian churches as well. Sadly, many churches exercise not a wit of discernment when it comes to such matters.

When you look into the church affiliation of Joel Hemphill, you discover the source of his false teaching. Some of my readers may recall that I have mentioned the name of Anthony Buzzard on The Dividing Line. Buzzard is an anti-Trinitarian and, evidently, is a part of the same denomination giving rise to Hemphill's teachings, the Church of God General Conference.


So be warned. Wolves don't have to snarl. Sometimes they sing.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Cotton Mather













Cotton Mather (1663-1728)

(b. Feb. 12, 1663, Boston, Massachusetts Bay Colony [U.S.]—d. Feb. 13, 1728, Boston), "American Congregational minister and author, supporter of the old order of the ruling clergy, who became the most celebrated of all New England Puritans. He combined a [supposedly -WC] mystical strain (he believed in the existence of witchcraft) with a modern scientific interest (he supported smallpox inoculation).

The son of Increase Mather and the grandson of John Cotton and Richard Mather, Cotton Mather lived all his life in Boston. He entered Harvard at the age of 12, easily passing entrance requirements to read and write Latin and to "decline the Greek nouns and verbs." He devoted himself unremittingly to study and prayer. At 18 he received his M.A. degree from the hands of his father, who was president of the college.

He preached his first sermon in his father's church in August 1680 and
in October another from his grandfather John Cotton's pulpit. He was formally ordained in 1685 and became his father's colleague.

He devoted his life to praying, preaching, writing, and publishing and still followed his main purpose in life of doing good. His book, Bonifacius, or Essays to Do Good (1710), instructs others in humanitarian acts, some ideas being far ahead of his time: the schoolmaster to reward instead of punish his students, the physician to study the state of mind of his patient as a probable cause of illness. He established societies for community projects.

He joined his father in cautioning judges against the use of "spectre evidence" (testimony of a victim of witchcraft that he had been attacked by a spectre bearing the appearance of someone he knew) in the witchcraft trials and in working for the ouster of Sir Edmund Andros as governor of Massachusetts. He was also a leader in the fight for inoculation against smallpox, incurring popular disapproval. When Cotton inoculated his own son, who almost died from it, the whole community was wrathful, and a bomb was thrown through his chamber window. Satan seemed on the side of his enemies; various members of his family became ill, and some died. Worst of all, his son Increase was arrested for rioting.

Mather's interest in science and particularly in various American phenomena—published in his Curiosa Americana (1712-24)—won him membership in the Royal Society of London. His account of the inoculation episode was published in the society's transactions. He corresponded extensively with notable scientists, such as Robert Boyle. His Christian Philosopher (1721) recognizes God in the wonders of the earth and the universe beyond; it is both philosophical and scientific and, ironically, anticipates 18th-century Deism, despite his clinging to the old order.

Cotton Mather wrote and published more than 400 works. His magnum opus was Magnalia Christi Americana (1702) [BOT], an ecclesiastical history of America from the founding of New England to his own time. His Manuductio ad Ministerium (1726) was a handbook of advice for young graduates to the ministry: on doing good, on college love affairs, on poetry and music, and on style. His ambitious 20-year work on biblical learning was interrupted by his death." (BCD)

Here is the link to the original article:
Cotton
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Charles Fry at 0 Comments Links to this post

Monday, July 7, 2008

Balancing Wealth and Integrity

The first chapter of Job gives us two very important facts about Job.

1. His godly character: Verse 1

2. His wealth: Verse 3


For many people if they were to obtain great wealth it would negativly effect their spirtual walk.

Recently Back to the Bible did a program in which they talked about this:

That's quite a description of this man Job. Now, as I say, yesterday we learned all about his integrity. Today I want to focus on another aspect of Job, and that is his wealth. This is a man who had moral character and a great deal of wealth. And I know in the 21st century, we often think those two things don't go together--that money corrupts us, and as a result, we cannot possibly be moral and have money at the same time.

So when you look at the catalog of Job's wealth, you're not surprised that this man is the wealthiest man of all the Old Testament. Well, we're talking about Bill Gates' kind of wealth here, or Warren Buffet wealth, or John B. Rockefeller wealth, or your wealth--well, maybe not your wealth (laughter)--but we're talking about a lot of wealth here.

I want you to see the catalog of wealth. Verse 3 (Job 1:3), check it out again. This is a man who had 7,000 sheep. Sheep were generally used for food--lamb in the Middle East is beef in the United States and Canada. We tend toward beef.

The lamb that they do in Israel, they breed what they call fat-tailed sheep. And somehow they get the fat to go to the tail! But when they barbeque lamb, I'm telling you, every time I eat it, I think I've died and gone to heaven! In fact, I schedule when we take a tour (we do this every year to Israel and take folks like you along), when we go to Israel, I schedule lunch around where I can get barbequed lamb. Now don't tell anybody that (laughter) because that would destroy their image!

When you have 7,000 sheep, you are talking about a pretty good flock of sheep. He also has 3,000 camels. Now a camel was never used for food. A camel was always used--they got milk from camels, but they were used for transportation. Camels could go for miles without water. Camels are mentioned as early as the days of the patriarchs.

Later on, of course, the horse replaced the camel as a means of transportation, but a camel was just an incredible animal. And for Job to have 3,000 of them! And then notice also, he has 500 yoke of oxen. Now a yoke is two, so that means he has 1,000 oxen. These are the work horses, if I can use that term, for ancient Israelites and people of the ancient Near East.

So now he has 1,000 John Deeres®, or Massey Fergusons®, or Cases® in his garage because these are the ones who do the work. These are the plowing animals, you know. And the reason they could plow so good was, obviously, they were strong as an ox! (Laughter) Sorry, forgive me, I couldn't help myself!

Oxen--they were used for daily work and then, in addition to that, notice verse 3 says he had 500 she donkeys (female donkeys). These were the more humble means of transportation. This is generally what a person would ride in the ancient Near East. It's kind of like having a Ford® or a Chevy® or a Kia® or something in your garage as opposed to a Mercedes® or a Lexus®, whatever.

What you see here is: You see a man who has just this incredible catalog of wealth, but it kind of rounds out the catalog in verse 3 when it says he has a very large household. You would need a very large household. You need servants to care for these sheep and these donkeys and these camels.

Often in the Old Testament when you were a man of significance, a man of means, a man of wealth, a man of importance, you had personal servants to show the world how many servants you had and how important you were. Wasn't it Abraham that had 318 (was it?) trained servants at his command?

Well, all right, here's Job. Job has all these animals. He has a very great retinue of servants to help him with all these animals. In this country he's a sheik; he is not a Jewish sheik, he does not live in Israel. He's a sheik from the land of Uz. Sometime this week we'll discuss where Uz is, but what I want you to know is this is a man that, in all candor, was the wealthiest man in the ancient East.

When you see that expression there at the end of verse 3, "the greatest of all the people of the East," I don't think that's hyperbole. I think what the Bible is saying is, "This was the greatest person of integrity; this was the greatest person of wealth; this was the best known person in all the ancient East." "There was a man in the land of Uz, whose name was Job" (1:1).

This is a country that spawned sheiks like we in the West spawn lawyers (laughter)--they were everywhere. (Sorry about that, Tammy. I don't mean that in any sense other than that there were a lot of them!) There were a lot of sheiks, but if you take all the sheiks in the ancient Near East, and above all of them you find this man, Job.

So we're talking about a pretty significant character here. He's a man of wealth. The issue is: How do you balance wealth with integrity?



Any suggestions on how to balance that tension of having wealth and how much then should you give back, how much should you keep for yourself? That's a difficult decision.

In fact, I think Job provides some good examples here. Let's jump right into the second part of this study today. Think about getting that balance.

How do you get the balance? If there is a lesson for those of us who are less than tycoon-types like Job, what is it that we can learn from this man? When you look at the book, you see a book that bears the name of Job, and this book shows (I think) Job's relationship to God. The intent of the book is to show that throughout his life, whether he was being blessed with sheep or blessed with calamity, Job's relationship with God was never on hold. Job maintained that healthy relationship with God.

So let's notice some things here about how he maintained that relationship. What I want you to see here is that the very first relationship we learn about in the Book of Job is Job's relationship to God; verse 1, he was a man "who feared God and shunned evil."

The second relationship we learn in the Book of Job is verse 2. That's the relationship between Job and his family.

The third relationship we learn is in verse 3. That's the relationship between Job and his holdings (his possessions, his money).

Now here's the thing: I think we've gotten this all backwards today. I think in our 21st century society, we have placed the third relationship as the first one in our list of priorities. Isn't it interesting when you meet a new person and you ask their name, and they tell you their name, what's the next question you ask them? Yeah, "What do you do for a living?" Because we put value on what people do, and we don't ask what their relationship with God is--we don't even ask about their family--we ask, "What do you do that makes money for you?"

I've told you this before, but some time ago I was on an airplane, and I fly enough with the airlines that I got bumped up to Business Class in this particular plane, and I don't ever say no if they want to treat me well (laughter). So I didn't pay for it, but I was up there, and I sat next to a man in a suit, and he was obviously a businessman, and I sat down and the first question he asked me is, "Well, what do you do?"

Now I happened to be in a suit as well. I admit this to you: The flesh got a hold of me. I wanted to say, "I'm a preacher of the Gospel," (laughter) but the flesh got a hold of me, and I said, "Well, I'm the President of an international bi-lingual, inter-lingual, multinational, multilingual, multimillion-dollar corporation."

I want to tell you, I got his attention. (Laughter) Now all those things are true: Back to the Bible is multinational, you know, but he sat up and took notice because of who he thought I was, and I wasn't anything more than when I sat down in that seat, you see. But, you see, that's our problem.

We have our relationships topsy-turvy.
Now here's what I want you to see here: In Job's relationships, the very first thing Job introduces us to is his relationship with God, and I think when you and I have our relationship with God right, whether we have a lot of money or no money at all, we're going to be OK with the money that we have. It's when we don't have our relationship with God right that we're always greedy about getting more.

The second thing I learned about this balance is, after his relationship with God, we're going to learn a lot about his relationship to his family: his relationship to those kids. Now let's face it: Job is not just the wealthiest man in the ancient Near East, he's a daddy--he's got seven sons and three daughters--and he has family responsibilities.

So, his first relationship is his relationship with God (verse 1), his second relationship is his relationship with his family (verse 2), and then his third relationship is the relationship with all the things he had around him.

Now, Job didn't, of course, but it's almost like Job knew the words of the Lord Jesus: Mark 8, Jesus said, " Whosoever will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me. For whosoever will save his life shall lose it; but whosoever shall lose his life for my sake and [for] the gospel's, the same shall save it. For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?" (Mark 8:34-36, KJV)

Now, I think Job, even though he was not Jewish (he predates the Law; he didn't have the Old Testament Law to go by; he certainly didn't have any of the Law of Christ to go by; he didn't know anything about Christianity; he didn't know anything about godliness as you and I would define godliness today), this is nonetheless a man who clearly understood what it was like to be a man of God because he feared God and at the same time he shunned evil.

He was a man who had a blameless character and was upright. He knew what was right, innately, not by reading the Ten Commandments, or by taking the Alpha Course, or anything like that. This is a man who knew what was right because he had a relationship with God.

How then do we make the decisions--the tough decisions--that relate to our own wealth, or even our lack of wealth? I think we make those decisions by keeping the relationships intact and making a priority of our relationships.

The most important relationship you have is your relationship with God, and your second most important relationship is that relationship you men have with your wife and your family. And then business, office, the guys, Fantasy Football--all the other things you like to do--that has to come somewhere after that. And when that's right, we don't seem to have a problem balancing integrity and wealth.


I think the program brought up some very good points. I would love to hear what others think about this subject. Please leave a comment and share your thoughts.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 1 Comments Links to this post

Devotional Gem















THE CHRISTIAN'S PRESENT FOR ALL SEASONS
Containing Devotional Thoughts of Eminent Divines
Joseph Hall, Isaac Watts, John Owen, Richard Sibbes, John Flavel, Jonathan Edwards, Richard Baxter, John Bunyan, William Jay and More

An Introductory Essay on "Devotion" by William B. Sprague sets the stage for a rich devotional journey from Joseph Hall to William Jay. This volume was published in 1866 by The American Tract Society and it contains dozens and dozens of brief devotional exercises to stimulate the brethren to love and good works. The contributors to this volume are a veritable who's who in evangelical circles from the Puritan era to the mid-nineteenth century.

W.B. Sprague concluded his Introductory Essay with these words: "Among the many excellent works adapted especially to help the Christian in his devotions, this book holds a prominent place. The Compiler seems to have ranged through almost the whole field of devotional literature, and to have gathered up all the brightest gems that came in his way; and so successful has he been that one may open the book at random, as often as he will, and will never find his eye resting upon anything that he can afford to pass over, or that does not supply the elements of rich devotional thought. It is difficult to say which is most to be admired, the Compiler's good judgment and taste, or his extraordinary patience in research, that has brought to us the heavenly thoughts of so many saints and sages. This is truly a beautiful compilation of DEVOTIONAL THOUGHTS."


D.A. Harsha, the Editor, said the following in his Preface: "It is more than ten years since the preparation of the present volume was commenced. During all this time, the selection of these beautiful passages has been slowly but steadily carried on. The work was undertaken in connection with the editing of a Library of Christian Authors, embracing Memoirs of Eminent Divines, and their choice works--a series whose preparation is not yet completed. In performing this long and arduous labor, and while carefully perusing the works of our best authors, from the 17th century to the present time, passages in each author, which the editor regarded as among the finest specimens of devotional and practical writing, were selected for the present volume. In this manner have these 'calm and holy thoughts' of those who have shone as stars in the firmament of the Christian Church, been brought together; and it is believed that in the following pages will be found some of the choicest gems of English sacred literature--gems which 'within small compass, and in purest gold, will preserve their lustre for ages.'"

"Sweet food from savory writers. Perfect for the breakfast table, the bedside, the bathroom, red lights, or anywhere else where a minute or two can be redeemed for your soul's nourishment." - Dr. Robert Martin, Pastor of Emmanuel Reformed Baptist Church, Seattle and Editor of Reformed Baptist Theological Review

"A quick scan of the table of contents makes clear that this book could be referred to as the hall of fame of devotional literature. Theological depth and practical application define the writings of men like John Flavel, Richard Baxter, John Bunyan, Matthew Henry and the rest of the authors of this book. This book would make a wonderful gift for any occasion of the year. The recipient of such a gift would have a library in one volume of some of the greatest minds in Christian history. This book would be useful in leading family worship because it would expose your family to classic reformed theology in a devotional format. Buy this book in bulk, keep a copy for yourself and pass down the truth by giving your remaining copies away." - Ray Rhodes, Jr. is President of Nourished in the Word Ministries and author of two Solid Ground Books, "Family Worship for the Reformation Season" and "Family Worship for the Christmas Season."

"In a day of time-sensitivity when every minute and hour seems to be at a premium, the leisure our forebears had for reading seems a pipe-dream for most of God's people. What is the solution? We need better stewardship of our time, for starters. But also we need books like this one that distill the riches of eminent divines from the past and give them to us in succinct packages that will stay with us through the day and week.I am glad to see this marvellous collection reprinted by Solid Ground Christian Books." - Dr. Michael Haykin

One book notice said, "A collection of the holiest aspirations of the holiest men."

This is a 572 page Large Paperback Volume


You can order the book at this link:
book

While you are there be sure you order me a copy of the book as well!

Have a great Monday.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Sunday, July 6, 2008

Pilgrim's Progress- What a Great Movie!


Wow! I've been hopeful (no pun intended) that someday there would be a good and accurate presentation of John Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress out there in the DVD/cinema world. With so much junk masquerading as "Christian" (again, no pun intended!) it is sometimes hard to fully embrace just about anything on the screen.


Well...my days of hoping are finally fulfilled. Thanks to a friend in my church for letting me know about this modern adapatation of Bunyan's classic. I won't say much else other than, "Buy the DVD!" This is the link to the website: http://www.pilgrimsprogressthemovie.com/


You can buy it at a reasonable price. This might even be a great present for Christmas to lost loved ones...much Scripture quoted in it...and it is very clear in its gospel presentation. All I can say is wow! It is also a truly wonderful opportunity to sit down with your kids and hit the "Pause" button; "So...what did that scene mean? Why do you think they got in trouble when they went to Vanity Fair? Why do you think they called that man "Flatterer?"


A word of warning though...there are a couple brief scenes that have demonic characters that may scare young children...you should watch the movie first to make sure your kids won't be too scared in certain scenes.


I sure hope they come out with Christiana's Journey someday!
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Jim Leavenworth at 0 Comments Links to this post

Other Blogs To Read

There are millions of blogs to choose from but actually finding one you may be interested can be hard. So I want to mention two blogs that may be worth your time.

Worldview: This was the first blog I ever created and as of today I have had 18040 people visit the blog. The purpose of the blog is simply to report about what is going on in the world. I don't offer much of an opinion but I do provide a lot of information and cover stories that may not be covered elsewhere.

Here is the link:
Worldview

American Car: This is a brand new blog , in fact they have had only 141 people visit so far. I am not much into cars but it is always interesting to see a new blog be created and then watch how it changes and develops over time. When you visit make sure you take a few minutes and leave a comment. I remember when I fist started blogging and how excited I got when someone took the time to leave a comment.

Here is the link:
Cars
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Believer bitter over 'prosperity' preachings

The following story was found at CNN.COM


Believer bitter over 'prosperity' preachings

The message flickered into Cindy Fleenor's living room each night: Be faithful in how you live and how you give, the television preachers said, and God will shower you with material riches.

And so the 53-year-old accountant from the Tampa, Florida, area pledged $500 a year to Joyce Meyer, the evangelist whose frank talk about recovering from childhood sexual abuse was so inspirational. She wrote checks to flamboyant faith healer Benny Hinn and a local preacher-made-good, Paula White.

Only the blessings didn't come. Fleenor ended up borrowing money from friends and payday loan companies just to buy groceries. At first she believed the explanation given on television: Her faith wasn't strong enough.

"I wanted to believe God wanted to do something great with me like he was doing with them," she said. "I'm angry and bitter about it. Right now, I don't watch anyone on TV hardly."

To read the rest of the story follow this link:
prosperity
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Saturday, July 5, 2008

Tablet Ignites Debate on Messiah and Resurrection

I just received an e-mail pointing me to the following story.

The New York Times:
Tablet Ignites Debate on Messiah and Resurrection


JERUSALEM — A three-foot-tall tablet with 87 lines of Hebrew that scholars believe dates from the decades just before the birth of Jesus is causing a quiet stir in biblical and archaeological circles, especially because it may speak of a messiah who will rise from the dead after three days.

















If such a messianic description really is there, it will contribute to a developing re-evaluation of both popular and scholarly views of Jesus, since it suggests that the story of his death and resurrection was not unique but part of a recognized Jewish tradition at the time.

The tablet, probably found near the Dead Sea in Jordan according to some scholars who have studied it, is a rare example of a stone with ink writings from that era — in essence, a Dead Sea Scroll on stone.

It is written, not engraved, across two neat columns, similar to columns in a Torah. But the stone is broken, and some of the text is faded, meaning that much of what it says is open to debate.

Still, its authenticity has so far faced no challenge, so its role in helping to understand the roots of Christianity in the devastating political crisis faced by the Jews of the time seems likely to increase.

Daniel Boyarin, a professor of Talmudic culture at the University of California at Berkeley, said that the stone was part of a growing body of evidence suggesting that Jesus could be best understood through a close reading of the Jewish history of his day.

“Some Christians will find it shocking — a challenge to the uniqueness of their theology — while others will be comforted by the idea of it being a traditional part of Judaism,” Mr. Boyarin said.

Given the highly charged atmosphere surrounding all Jesus-era artifacts and writings, both in the general public and in the fractured and fiercely competitive scholarly community, as well as the concern over forgery and charlatanism, it will probably be some time before the tablet’s contribution is fully assessed. It has been around 60 years since the Dead Sea Scrolls were uncovered, and they continue to generate enormous controversy regarding their authors and meaning.

The scrolls, documents found in the Qumran caves of the West Bank, contain some of the only known surviving copies of biblical writings from before the first century A.D. In addition to quoting from key books of the Bible, the scrolls describe a variety of practices and beliefs of a Jewish sect at the time of Jesus.

How representative the descriptions are and what they tell us about the era are still strongly debated. For example, a question that arises is whether the authors of the scrolls were members of a monastic sect or in fact mainstream. A conference marking 60 years since the discovery of the scrolls will begin on Sunday at the Israel Museum in Jerusalem, where the stone, and the debate over whether it speaks of a resurrected messiah, as one iconoclastic scholar believes, also will be discussed.

Oddly, the stone is not really a new discovery. It was found about a decade ago and bought from a Jordanian antiquities dealer by an Israeli-Swiss collector who kept it in his Zurich home. When an Israeli scholar examined it closely a few years ago and wrote a paper on it last year, interest began to rise. There is now a spate of scholarly articles on the stone, with several due to be published in the coming months.

“I couldn’t make much out of it when I got it,” said David Jeselsohn, the owner, who is himself an expert in antiquities. “I didn’t realize how significant it was until I showed it to Ada Yardeni, who specializes in Hebrew writing, a few years ago. She was overwhelmed. ‘You have got a Dead Sea Scroll on stone,’ she told me.”

Much of the text, a vision of the apocalypse transmitted by the angel Gabriel, draws on the Old Testament, especially the prophets Daniel, Zechariah and Haggai.

Ms. Yardeni, who analyzed the stone along with Binyamin Elitzur, is an expert on Hebrew script, especially of the era of King Herod, who died in 4 B.C. The two of them published a long analysis of the stone more than a year ago in Cathedra, a Hebrew-language quarterly devoted to the history and archaeology of Israel, and said that, based on the shape of the script and the language, the text dated from the late first century B.C.


To read the rest of the article follow this link:
Tablet



Here is one other source that is reporting the story:

Tablet Ignites Debate On Messiah, Resurrection
Free Internet Press, NY - 5 hours ago
A three-foot-tall tablet with 87 lines of Hebrew that scholars believe dates from the decades just before the birth of Jesus is causing a quiet stir


If anyone else finds information about this story please post a comment or e-mail me at tsrk30@sbcglobal.net
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 1 Comments Links to this post

The Bible Challenge Quiz

How much do you know about the Bible?
Take the Bible Challenge and find out for yourself.

The Bible Challenge quiz for this week is called:

" James 1-3 "

Take the quiz now!
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

50 Reason Why I Don’t Read the Bible













Talk to people today about the bible and you will soon realize that everyone has an opinion but in most cases people are biblically illiterate!

Very few have really taken the time to read the bible and even fewer have taken the time to study it. Back To the Bible a ministry which is located in Nebraska recently did a survey to find out who people don't read the bible. Here is what they found:

Apathy
Bad eyesight
Bad time management
Burnout
Children
Church-related activities
Crazy schedule
Earthly interests
Guilt
Have no idea where to start
I am overextended
I am selfish
I don’t know!
I don’t like to read
I don’t understand it
It’s boring
It’s full of contradictions
Lack of a meaningful plan
Lack of desire
Lack of effort
Lack of time
Money issues
Mood
My church activities
My own laziness
I don’t have any accountability
Opposition
Other obligations
Other priorities
Over commitment
Overwhelmed
Poor excuses
Poor health
Pressures from work
I read other Bible-related literature
Satan
Lack of self-discipline
Sinfulness
I need sleep
Sometimes depression
The busyness of raising a family
There are things to do
Time & family
Time & procrastination
Too many distractions
Too much TV
I’m too tired
Tyranny of the urgent!
Work exhaustion
I don’t want others to see me because I
don’t want them to think I am showing off


What jumps out to you? For me it was the following reasons:

Church-related activities
My church activities

Now I cannot be for sure what these two reasons mean but I have a very good idea. Many churches instead of spending time teaching the bible and teaching people how to study it, actually creates all kinds of activities and functions that have nothing to do with the bible!

Think about it, Churches are creating activities that are actually taking people away from the bible!

Are you reading the bible on a regular basis?

Is your church teaching the bible?

Has your church taken the time to teach you how to really study the bible?

Here is some help in reading your bible:

Bible Reading Guides





Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 1 Comments Links to this post

Friday, July 4, 2008

Josephus on Jesus
















For Christians, books 18 through 20 of the Antiquities are far and away the most important sections in all of Josephus' writings, since they provide a rich background for the entire New Testament era. Happily, they are also the most authoritative chapters in the Antiquities since at long last Josephus is either an eyewitness of direct contemporary of the events he is reporting. His paragraphs on John the Baptist show Jesus' forerunner from a fresh vantage point, while his portrayal of crucial events in the career of Pontius Pilate help explain that governor's pressured performance at the trial of Jesus. In the case of Jesus' brother James, he even provides crucial addenda to the New Testatment, which does not tell us how James died. Josephus does!
His two celebrated references to Jesus - Antiquities 18:63 and 20:200 - have provoked an enormous quantity of scholarly literature. The constitute the largest block of first-century evidence for Jesus outside of biblical or Christian sources, and may well be the reason that the vast works of Josephus survived manuscript transmission across the centuries almost intact when other great works, like those of Nicolas of Damascus, where totally lost. But are the Jesus references authentic?
Scholars fall into three main camps on the first and longer paragraph on Jesus (18:63) which occurs amid events during Pilate's administration: 1) it is entirely authentic; 2) it is entirely a Christian forgery; or 3) it contains Christian interpolations in what was Josephus' authentic material about Jesus. The first option, held by very few, would seem hopeless: no Jew could have claimed Jesus as the Messiah who rose from the dead without converting to Christianity, and Josephus did not convert. The second position, popular in late nineteenth-century skeptical scholarship, has some minor current support. A large majority of scholars today, however, share the third position (favored in these pages), particularly in view of the newly-discovered Agapian text which shows no signs of interpolation.
Josephus must have mentioned Jesus in authentic core material at 18:63 since this passage is present in all Greek manuscripts of Josephus, and the Agapian version accords well with his vocabulary and grammar elsewhere. Moreover, Jesus is portrayed as a "wise man" [sophos aner], a phrase not used by Christians but employed by Josephus for such Old Testament figures as David and Solomon. Furthermore, his claim that Jesus won over "many of the Greeks" is not substantiated in the New Testament, and thus hardly a Christian interpolation but rather something that Josephus would have noted in his own day. Finally, the fact that the second reference to Jesus at 20:200 merely calls him the Christos without further explanation implies that a previous fuller identification had already taken place.
Josephus' second reference to Jesus in connection with the death of his half-brother James (20:200) shows no tampering whatever and is present in all Josephus manuscripts. Had there been Christian interpolation, more material would doubtless have been presented than this brief, passing notice. James would likely have been wreathed in laudatory language and styled "the brother of the Lord," as the New Testament defines him, rather than, as Josephus, "the brother of Jesus." Nor could the New Testatment have served as Josephus' source since it provides no detail on James' death. For Josephus to further define Jesus as the one "who was called the Christos" was both credible and necessary in view of the twenty other Jesuses he cites in his works. In fact, the very high priest who succeeded Ananus, who instigated the death of James, was Jesus, son of Damnaeus. Accordingly, most scholars concur with ranking Josephus authority Louis H. Feldman in his notation in the Loeb edition of Josephus: "...few have doubted the genuineness of the passage [20:200] on James" (Louis H. Feldman, tr., Josephus, IX [Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1965] 496).
The weight of evidence, then, strongly suggests that Josephus mentioned Jesus in both passages. He did so in a manner totally congruent with the New Testatment portrait of Jesus, and his description, from the vantage point of a non-Christian, seems remarkably fair, particularly in view of his known proclivity of roasting false messiahs as the sorts who misled the people and brought on the Romans.
You can order Josephus: The Essential Works for a total of $24 by calling the Issues, Etc. resource line at 1-800-737-0172.
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Patriotic Church Services

Today is the 4th of July and many Churches this Sunday will have a patriotic service. The question that I want people to think about is simple, should a church do this?

I found this great article which is posted on the Reformed Baptist Fellowship blog


The 4th of July is near, and it’s time for cookouts, barbecue, fireworks, and - so it seems - patriotic worship services. At least in my neck of the woods, these are often called “God and country” services. A typical patriotic service might include a presentation of the American flag, singing of patriotic hymns, and a message centered around the Christian roots of the United States and a call to return to them. Are these services God-honoring? Are they wise? These questions strike close to home for me. My sons have been asked more than once to present the flag with their Boy Scout troop during the patriotic service at a local Baptist church. I’ve been in services like this myself while visiting family over the 4th of July. As an elder in a local church, I must provide guidance for our own flock as well. This whole issue calls for wisdom and charity.


The first question we should be asking is what God wants. God has gone to great lengths to tell us how he wants to be worshiped. Therefore, He may not be worshiped in ways that we invent. Isn’t that the problem with idolatry - attempting to worship the true God under a form that he hasn’t revealed? Worshiping according to his revelation focuses our energies on those activities we know that God has called us to. Think what confidence this gives us in approaching God when we know he has called us to do the very thing we’re doing!

Most importantly, in worship we focus on God. “My glory I will not give to another.” (Isaiah 48:11) We do not honor God when we seek to honor anything else alongside him. The name “God and country” itself raises a concern. It seems to put country on the same level as God. Of course, we should give thanks to God for all kinds of things, including his blessings on our country. And I think this is what most churches intend to do. But the form and content of these services often seems to communicate that country has been elevated more than is intended. A quick look at “My Country, ‘Tis of Thee” will show that it is a very nice hymn to express patriotic feelings toward our country. However, it is only incidentally about God. It may be a perfectly fine song to sing at an Independence Day rally. But it has no more place in a worship service than a love song that thanks God at the end for providing the lover. Patriotism and worship are two different things; we don’t want to confuse them in our hearts or our lips.

We know that God has called us to preaching, singing, prayer and thanksgiving, and the sacraments of baptism and the Lord’s Supper. But as we search the Scriptures, we find no other ceremonies instituted for the gathered new covenant community. If not, then extra-biblical ceremonies like a flag presentation or reciting the pledge of allegiance have no place in gathered worship. God has not said that he is pleased by such things.

Patriotic services create another problem. The body of Christ is a united body - neither Jew nor Greek nor barbarian nor Cythian (Col. 3:11). We are told that heavenly worship is conducted by those “ransomed people…from every tribe and language and people and nation.” (Rev. 5:9) Why would we focus an entire worship service on a theme that only a very small part of the body of Christ in a very specific time in history could appreciate? Could those who are not U.S. citizens enter into such worship, particularly those who may have different political views or whose ancestors have suffered at the hands of ungodly policies in our nation’s history? These themes raise great difficulties for enacting the unity in life and worship to which we are called as God’s people.

In some respects, patriotic services reflect solid biblical instincts. We are to pray and give thanks for kings and authorities, “that we may lead a peaceful and quiet life, godly and dignified in every way.” (1 Tim. 2:1-2) There is a place-an important one-for praying for and giving thanks for our government that allows us such freedoms. Praise God for these blessings! We ought to be lifting up our country, our political leaders, and our soldiers for both prayer and thanksgiving on a regular basis. But these blessings are lower than the blessing of God himself. The glory of Christ is the gospel of Christ, and this ought to be our focus:

Your mercy, my God, is the theme of my song, 
The joy of my heart, and the boast of my tongue.

Why are we tempted to put our country on a pedestal where only God belongs? I believe there are at least two reasons. The first is probably natural; the second is theological. Naturally, we want to believe that God accepts and blesses our country and our family. But this natural desire often causes us to forget that we live in a fallen world. Every institution and every individual is corrupted by sin. Only the grace of God can redeem us. While God may and does work through nations and families, his redemptive work happens as each individual is born again and is transformed by the gospel. We can find encouragement that God is and has been at work in our nation. However, our standing with God doesn’t depend on this. Our national citizenship does not make us any more or less acceptable to God.

Theologically, many evangelicals have bought into a doctrine one might call “Christian America.” This view seems to hold that God has uniquely owned this country and is singularly at work here; furthermore, it is held as a matter of high principle that the Founding Fathers were largely influenced by Christian principles. But note that these are historical questions, not theological ones. Since the Bible says nothing about America in particular (unless you believe some of today’s prophecy “experts”), we can’t treat this question as though a biblical principle is at stake. The growth of the kingdom is not tied to the recovery of an earlier Christianized culture in the United States. The kingdom of God is primarily manifested in the church across all nations in the present age. The church embraces the rule of Christ now (Col. 1:13); the church exercises the keys of the kingdom (Matt. 16:19); the church is entrusted with the proclamation of the message of the kingdom and is the instrument of the kingdom (Luke 8:1). The hope of the gospel is not tied to the fortunes - past or present - of America.

Is it a sin to have a patriotic worship service? I suppose there are ways of handling such a service that would meet the biblical requirements of being God-centered and of focusing on prayer and thanksgiving. At the same time, our hearts so easily turn good things into idols. We can so easily elevate our country above its true significance. And we so easily think small thoughts of God. Putting God and country together in a worship service may very well feed on both these tendencies. So let’s do our barbecue, our fireworks, and our patriotic songs with friends and family to celebrate the history and the place where God has put us. But when we worship on the Lord’s Day, “together with all those who in every place call upon the name of our Lord Jesus,” let us worship the one who will be exalted among all nations.

Stan Reeves, Elder
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 6 Comments Links to this post

Why American Churches Are In Big Trouble

One of the goals of this blog is to point out to people the fact that the American church is in big trouble, and for the most part moving in the wrong direction. I just found a video that expresses many of the thoughts we have shared on this blog. Please take a few minutes and watch the video. Here is the link:
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Thursday, July 3, 2008

TIME TO READ

I hope everyone has a great 4th of July weekend. I wanted to take some time tonight to suggest some good books and a great DVD.

History of the Reformation in the Time of Calvin

This is a set of four books that was originally 16 volumes and published as eight volumes in 1867. This set was out of print for 150 years. Jean Henri Merle d'Aubigne (1794-1872), was born in Geneva, Switzerland, to French Protestant (Huguenot) parents. He was highly educated, but not as a Christian. Calvin and the Reformation was no longer a great influence in Geneva. Robert Haldane, a Scottish Presbyterian, visited the city in 1817 and as a result, many, including d'Aubigne, were converted. At this point, d'Aubigne took up theological studies and was ordained. He became the pastor of the French Reformed Church in Hamburg in 1818. He eventually spent 41 years as professor of church history in Geneva. This edition closely follows the original text and the page numbering matches the original. Pages: 2039. Publisher: Hartland Publications. Cover: paperback.


THE LIFE OF CHARLES HODGE
Archibald Alexander Hodge
Charles Hodge has in his Systematic Theology provided a storehouse from which succeeding generations have steadily drawn. Warring against a waning Calvinism, a rising Darwinism, and a threatening biblical criticsm, Hodge sought to reassert the biblical faith in a fashion both persuasive and impregnable. This definitive biography has the advantage of being written by a theologian who understood the issues at stake. Also, it was written by a son who understood the man.VERY SCARCE AND LONG OUT OF PRINT.NOW AVAILABLE FOR THE FIRST TIME IN OVER 100 YEARS!

FAITH, OBEDIENCE & JUSTIFICATION
Current Evangelical Departures from 'Sola Fide'
Sam Waldron
The undermining of classical Protestant formulations of 'sola fide' is a significant, and disheartening, feature in contemporary evangelical discussions of soteriology -

Waldron understands this and provides trenchant historical and theological critique in crystal clear prose." - Ligon Duncan"

For those still studying the issues of 'the obedience of faith' and its meaning in Reformation theology vs. modern 'covenant nomism', this is a must read." - Fred Malone"

Sam Waldron has done us a tremendous service. He has culled the writings of Luther, Calvin and Reformed symbolics of sola fide. His method is clear. His distinctions are crucial. His conclusions are cogent." - Richard Barcellos

THE EXPOSITORY GENIUS OF JOHN CALVIN
Stephen J. Lawson

"Through an introductory study of John Calvin's preaching, Steve Lawson provides a practical Homiletics 1 refresher course that can be read in one evening, but should be read annually for lifelong impact. Factual yet stimulating, simple yet penetrating, '

The Expository Genius of John Calvin' contains many scriptural and theocentric golden nuggets and hands-on practical tips for beginning expositors and seasoned preachers alike. May God use it to revitalize Christ-centered and Spirit-empowered applicatory preaching in our day." - Dr. Joel R. Beeke

"Preachers reading this book will be moved to take to heart Calvin's encompassion belief in the sovereignty of God's Word - as to its total sufficiency and massive potency. Further, they will be inspired to pursue the deep, enriching paths of lectio continua. This is a beautifully written, powerful, and convincing book. It is a must read for all who aspire to preach the word." - R. Kent Hughes

"In this book, Dr. Steve Lawson has masterfully presented us with thirty-two keynotes that made Calvin the best preacher of the Reformation, all of them centered around the Word of God preached expositorily. I would make this book recommended reading in courses such as homiletics and missions for any serious pastor and student." - Dr. Alonzo Ramirez

"An infectious appreciation of the preaching of John Calvin from the pen of Steven Lawson. No one reading this volume can fail to appreciate the debt we owe the 'Genevan Reformer.' Lawson has consulted the best of current scholarship and has produced a comprehensive distillation of the contours of the Reformer's preaching and, with it, a compelling advocacy of consecutive expository preaching. A magnificent achievement."
-Dr. Derek Thomas


And one last suggestion:

AMAZING GRACE:
The History & Theology of Calvinism
Hosted by Eric Holmberg

This is a three-part, ten section DVD hosted by Eric Holmberg over two and half hours (est. running time) that covers and hopefully answers these and many other questions. Useful for Sunday school, Wednesday night study, small group or new members class. Crammed full of vignettes, analogies and interviews from leading Biblical scholars, church historians and pastors such as Dr. R.C. Sproul, Dr. D. James Kennedy, Dr. George Grant, Dr. Stephen Mansfield, Dr. Thomas Ascol, Dr. Thomas Nettles, Dr. Roger Schultz, Pastor Walt Chantry, Dr. Joe Morecraft, Dr. Ken Talbot, Pastor Walter Bowie and Dr. R.C. Sproul, Jr.,

this video will explain what the great Baptist preacher C.H. Spurgeon meant when he said "to deny Calvinism is to deny the gospel of Jesus Christ." "This video series boldly, clearly, and winsomely sets forth the glorious, saving grace of God in its splendor and will help thousands to understand the gospel better and so to be filled with praise for their Savior." -Dr. E. Calvin Beisner, associate professor of historical theology and social ethics, Knox Theological Seminary, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

STUDY GUIDE AVAILABLE


All of these suggestions can be ordered from this link:
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

Wednesday, July 2, 2008

TV evangelists

The following is from the BBC:

They preach prosperity - that God can make you healthy and wealthy.

Every year some of America's best known TV evangelists bring in hundreds of millions of dollars from donors all over the world. But as Jonathan Beale reports, some of the TV evangelists' own lifestyles have begun to ring alarm bells and prompted a Senate investigation into their activities.


You can watch the BBC report at this link:
Evangelist
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 0 Comments Links to this post

And The "I's" Don't Have It.

If Apple ruled the world we’d:

Get up out of our iBeds, get in our iCars, got to our iJobs, and bring home some iCash.

But since God rules the world, we’re just stewards of:

His bed, his car, his job, and his cash.

Bookmark and Share
> posted by Jason McFadden at 0 Comments Links to this post

Tuesday, July 1, 2008

Holy #%!*
















Today at work I overheard someone say, "Holy" and then used a word that could be used to describe human waste. It made me and one of the Preaching Today team members ask the following question. What does an attribute of God and human waste have in common? We have so lost the understanding of holiness that we find many people using the word in various exclamatory phrases as part of their everyday speech. The things they refer to as holy are common, and often, unholy.

Today the devotional I use offers Psalm 99 as the text. In Psalm 99, God is called Holy 3 times in 9 verses. Do we really understand what it means that God is Holy?

John MacArthur describes God's holiness in the following two paragraphs:

"His being is utterly separate from ours, and He made that so clear. His is being and ours is becoming,. He is utterly distinct from us. The Hebrew is qadach, the Greek, hagios, meaning distinct, separate, He is other than we are as to the essence of His existence, His nature. Therefore nothing in the creation, no one in the creation even man created in the image of God compares to God in essential nature. He is incomparable. He is infinite perfection. That is why His name is separate, distinct, or holy. And thus does Exodus 15:11 say, “Who is like you, majestic in holiness?” And there, I think, is what those mediaeval theologians were after, to add majestic to utter distinction somehow is an expression of worship. First Samuel 2:2 says, “There is no one holy like the Lord. There is no one beside You,” no one exists in Your category of being but You. Psalm 111 says, “Holy and awesome is His name.”

When we think of God’s holiness, we think of His utter separation from sin because everything in the creation is effected and influenced by sin. But there’s more to His separateness than that, however, that for us is the graphic illustration. It’s hard for us to metaphysically comprehend the difference between being and becoming. We see clearly God’s distinction from us in the matter of His moral, perfection and sinlessness. As Habakkuk the prophet wrote, “Your eyes are too pure to approve evil. You cannot look on wickedness.” Job 34:10 says, “Far be it from God to do wickedness, to do wrong.” In Revelation 15:4 it says, “You alone are holy.” There are many other statements. That gives you sort of a broad picture across Scripture."

If we clearly understood holiness and the fact that our God is Holy, we would refrain from using an attribute of God in a way that destroys the meaning and weight of the word. When we say "holy cow," what are we saying? That a cow has the same attribute of God? When we say Holy C@#% are we saying human waste is holy? Are we daring to use the attribute of God to describe human waste? The world has no idea what holiness is because many times his children are using the word to describe that which is not holy.

May we take the time tonight to meditate on our Holy, Holy, Holy God!
Bookmark and Share
> posted by Trevor Hammack at 3 Comments Links to this post

Did Jesus Commit Suicide?

Did Jesus commit suicide?

Believe it or not, some people have claimed that Jesus’ death on the cross was his own suicide. If that were so, then at best, however, it could only have been a passive suicide, for Jesus did not actively inflict upon himself means to die. 

Some may claim Jesus committed suicide to discredit the validity and sufficiency of his death to atone for sins. Others may claim it merely on technicality. The basis for these claims are on the reasoning that if Jesus was God and was all-powerful he could have stopped his death but he didn't so it was suicide, and it could be on John 10:14-18 where Jesus says he lays down his life and no one takes it from him. But did Jesus mean he intended on suicide? Of course not. If you read all the verses you'll see:

John 10:14-18   14 I am the good shepherd. I know my own and my own know me,  15 just as the Father knows me and I know the Father; and I lay down my life for the sheep.  16 And I have other sheep that are not of this fold. I must bring them also, and they will listen to my voice. So there will be one flock, one shepherd.  17 For this reason the Father loves me, because I lay down my life that I may take it up again.  18 No one takes it from me, but I lay it down of my own accord. I have authority to lay it down, and I have authority to take it up again. This charge I have received from my Father." 

People who commit suicide do it so that they will die, and stay dead. Jesus allowed himself to be killed so that he could rise again, not stay dead.

Also, we see in the garden of Gethsemane that Jesus, unlike those who commit suicide, did not really want to die:

Matthew 26:39   39 And going a little farther he fell on his face and prayed, saying, "My Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me; nevertheless, not as I will, but as you will." 

The best rebuttal I have heard came from a Death & Dying philosophy class where this very discussion took place, for more than one semester at that. The rebuttal was that even if Jesus committed suicide, it did not really count because…he rose from the dead 3 days later! The beauty of this rebuttal was that while others were trying to discredit the death of Christ, the glory of Christ in his resurrection was proclaimed, and with that the detractors were, if but for a moment, silenced. Glory be to God!

Bookmark and Share
> posted by Jason McFadden at 0 Comments Links to this post